Journal of Porous Materials

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 1043–1057 | Cite as

Drying induced phase separation in poly(styrene)–poly(ethylene glycol)–chlorobenzene system

  • Jyoti Sharma
  • Raj Kumar AryaEmail author
  • Sanjeev Ahuja


The morphological studies of poly(styrene)–poly(ethylene glycol)–chlorobenzene films have been performed using scanning electron microscopy. The average diameter of the holes present in the coatings decreased from 7.68 to 3.74 µm with the increase in the polymer content from 5 to 10%. The solvent played a major role in forming ordered porous polymer films. Asymmetric membrane formed at different concentrations of the ternary system. The effects of various parameters like polymer mass fraction, initial film thickness, and technique of application, on the pore size and uniformity have been studied. The membranes are formed at different concentrations of the ternary system.


Multipolymeric membranes Asymmetric membranes Solvent casting Phase separation Layer-by-layer coatings 



The authors are grateful to the Science and Engineering Research Board-Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India (Project File No. EEQ/2016/000015) for the research funding, and the Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, for the Seed Grant and other necessary facilities to conduct this research. Authors also like to thank to Mr. Aadil Batla, Ph.D Scholar, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, TIET Patiala for helping in image analysis.


  1. 1.
    A. Mirmohseni, A. Oladegaragoze, Construction of a sensor for determination of ammonia and aliphatic amines using polyvinylpyrrolidone coated quartz crystal microbalance. Sens. Actuators B 89, 164–172 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Wu, F. Xu, B. Sun, R. Fu, H. He, K. Matyjaszewski, Design and preparation of porous polymers. Chem. Rev. 112, 3959–4015 (2012)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Pitois, B. Francois, Formation of ordered micro-porous membranes. Eur. Phys. J. B 8, 225–231 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Widawski, M. Rawiso, B. François, Self-organized honeycomb morphology of star-polymer polystyrene films. Nature 369, 387 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Francois, Y. Ederle, C. Mathis, Honeycomb membranes made from C60 (PS) 6. Synth. Met. 103 (1999) 2362–2363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Ladewig, M.N.Z. Al-Shaeli, Fundamentals of membrane processes, in Fundamentals of Membrane Bioreactors (Springer, Singapore, 2017), pp. 13–37Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Vaessen, A. McCormick, L. Francis, Effects of phase separation on stress development in polymeric coatings. Polymer 43, 2267–2277 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.K. Arya, Phase separation in multicomponent polymer–solvent–nonsolvent coatings. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 18, 30–40 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.-T. Hsu, Y.L. Yao, Effect of film formation method and annealing on morphology and crystal structure of poly(l-lactic acid) films. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 136, 021006 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.K. Arya, Calibration curves to measure concentrations in multicomponent polymeric coatings using confocal Raman spectroscopy. Int. J. Chem. Eng. Appl. 2, 421–424 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Sharma, R.K. Arya, S. Ahuja, C.K. Bhargava, Residual solvent study in polymer–polymer–solvent coatings: poly(styrene)–poly(methyl methacrylate)–tetrahydrofuran coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 113, 200–206 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Sharma, K. Tewari, R.K. Arya, Diffusion in polymeric systems—a review on free volume theory. Prog. Org. Coat. 111, 83–92 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Yabu, M. Takebayashi, M. Tanaka, M. Shimomura, Superhydrophobic and lipophobic properties of self-organized honeycomb and pincushion structures. Langmuir 21, 3235–3237 (2005)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Srinivasarao, D. Collings, A. Philips, S. Patel, Three-dimensionally ordered array of air bubbles in a polymer film. Science 292, 79–83 (2001)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O. Karthaus, N. Maruyama, X. Cieren, M. Shimomura, H. Hasegawa, T. Hashimoto, Water-assisted formation of micrometer-size honeycomb patterns of polymers. Langmuir 16, 6071–6076 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. de Boer, U. Stalmach, H. Nijland, G. Hadziioannou, Microporous honeycomb-structured films of semiconducting block copolymers and their use as patterned templates. Adv. Mater. 12, 1581–1583 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Yabu, M. Tanaka, K. Ijiro, M. Shimomura, Preparation of honeycomb-patterned polyimide films by self-organization. Langmuir 19, 6297–6300 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. Matsuyama, M. Nishiguchi, Y. Kitamura, Phase separation mechanism during membrane formation by dry-cast process. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 77, 776–783 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. François, O. Pitois, J. François, Polymer films with a self-organized honeycomb morphology. Adv. Mater. 7, 1041–1044 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. Ghannam, M. Manguian, J. François, L. Billon, A versatile route to functional biomimetic coatings: ionomers for honeycomb-like structures. Soft Matter 3, 1492–1499 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Nicho, D. Peña-Salgado, P. Altuzar-Coello, Morphological and physicochemical properties of spin-coated poly(3-octylthiophene)/polystyrene composite thin films. Thin Solid Films 518, 1799–1803 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    I. Sharifian, Conductive and biodegradable polyaniline/starch blends and their composites with polystyrene. Iran. Polym. J. 20, 319–328 (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. Ferrari, P. Fabbri, F. Pilati, Solvent and substrate contributions to the formation of breath figure patterns in polystyrene films. Langmuir 27, 1874–1881 (2011)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Panayiotou, J. Vera, Thermodynamics of polymer–polymer–solvent and block copolymer–solvent systems. I. Experimental measurements. Polym. J. 16, 89–102 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. Panayiotou, J. Vera, Thermodynamics of polymer–polymer–solvent and block copolymer–solvent systems. II. Theoretical treatment of data with the nonrandom new Flory theory. Polym. J. 16, 103–112 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Clark, Direct analysis of experimental tie line data (two polymer–one solvent systems) using Flory–Huggins theory. Carbohydr. Polym. 42, 337–351 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    P.E. Price, I.H. Romdhane, Multicomponent diffusion theory and its applications to polymer–solvent systems. AIChE J. 49, 309–322 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemistry and BiochemistryThapar Institute of Engineering & Technology (Deemed University)PatialaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringDr. B.R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, JalandharJalandharIndia
  3. 3.Department of Chemical EngineeringThapar Institute of Engineering & Technology (Deemed University)PatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations