Australian General Practitioners’ and Compensable Patients: Factors Affecting Claim Management and Return to Work
- 14 Downloads
Purpose General Practitioners (GPs) play an important role in personal injury compensation systems yet system processes have been perceived as burdensome. Objectives were to (1) determine attitudes of Australian GPs on health benefits of return to work (RTW) after injury/illness and (2) identify associations between GP characteristics and agreement with issues surrounding treating compensable patients. Methods Cross-sectional postal survey of 423 Australian GPs to determine agreement with issues associated with compensable patients (including patient advocacy, conflicting opinions between GPs and compensation systems, fitness-for-work certification, and refusal to treat). Results The vast majority of GPs agreed there was a health benefit to early RTW. GPs with 16–20 years’ experience had significantly higher odds of agreeing that the certificate of work capacity is the primary method of communication between RTW stakeholders (OR 2.36 [1.13–4.92]) than those with greater experience. 49% of GPs agreed they should be able to refuse to treat compensable patients. Female GPs had significantly lower odds (OR 0.60 [0.40–0.90]) of agreeing with right to refuse than male GPs, as did those from remote or regional practices (OR 0.43 [0.20–0.94]; OR 0.60 [0.39–0.92]) than GPs from urban practices. Conclusions Reducing administrative barriers identified by Australian GPs and improving communication with compensation systems will likely have a positive impact on their refusal to treat compensable patients.
KeywordsInjury Return to work Health services administration Refusal to treat Workers’ compensation Traffic accidents
This research did not receive any specific funding.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.Waddell G, Burton K. Is work good for your health and well-being? London: The Stationary Office; 2006.Google Scholar
- 2.Johnson D, Fry T. Factors affecting return to work after injury: a study for the Victorian Work Cover Authority. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research; 2002Google Scholar
- 3.Bunzli S, Singh N, Mazza D, Collie A, Kosny A, Ruseckaite R, Brijnath B. Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):313. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4226-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.The Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Australasian faculty of occupational and environmental medicine position statement on realising the health benefits of work. Sydney: The Royal Australasian College of Physicians; 2011Google Scholar
- 10.Skaner Y, Nilsson GH, Arrelov B, Lindholm C, Hinas E, Wilteus AL, Alexanderson K. Use and usefulness of guidelines for sickness certification: results from a national survey of all general practitioners in Sweden. BMJ Open. 2011;1(2):e000303. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Brijnath B, Bunzli S, Xia T, Singh N, Schattner P, Collie A, Sterling M, Mazza D. General practitioners knowledge and management of whiplash associated disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder: implications for patient care. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17(1):82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0491-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Department of Health. General practice workforce statistics—2013–2014. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/general+practice+statistics-1 (2018). Accessed 2 Nov 2018.