Reducing Biochar Particle Size with Nanosilica and Its Effect on Rubber Composite Reinforcement
- 9 Downloads
Since biochar is a renewable source of carbon, it has been examined as a substitute for carbon black as rubber composite filler. Although biochar can approach carbon black in terms of carbon and ash content, substituting carbon black with biochar typically degrades the mechanical properties of rubber composites because of the much larger particle size of biochar. Biochar is produced from biomass and must be size reduced by “top-down” methods such as milling. Thus, biochar frequently has populations of particles greater than 10 µm in diameter, which greatly reduce reinforcement properties by introducing localized stresses in the rubber composite. In this work we explore using nanosilica as a co-milling material with biochar as a means to reduce its particle size and consequently improve its ability to replace carbon black as rubber composite filler. Biochar co-milled with 1 wt% nanosilica was able to replace 40% of the carbon black filler in a styrene–butadiene rubber composite with virtually no loss in tensile strength. Also, elongation and toughness properties of the optimal biochar substituted composites were improved by over 31 and 24%, respectively.
KeywordsBiochar Nanosilica Carbon black Milling SBR Composite Tensile strength
The authors would like to thank A.J. Thomas for density measurements, CHN analysis, composite preparation, and tensile measurements. Jason Adkins provided ash content data and Arthur Thompson obtained the SEM images.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
- 1.NASA (2016) Scientific consensus: earth's climate is warming. https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/. Accessed July 6, 2017
- 2.Lehmann J, Joseph S (2015) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 14.Peterson SC, Appell M, Jackson MA et al (2013) Comparing corn stover and switchgrass biochar: characterization and sorption properties. Can J Agric Sci 5:1–8Google Scholar
- 16.Clarke M (2013) It is easy to say rubber... https://www.pneurama.com/en/rivista_articolo.php/IT-IS-EASY-TO-SAY-RUBBER-?ID=18356&ACCETTO_COOKIE=yes. Accessed Aug 12, 2017
- 17.Bath F (2005) Consistent milling on a nano scale. Ceram Forum Int 82:2Google Scholar
- 21.Gour S (2010) Manufacturing nano-sized powders using salt- and sugar-assisted milling. Drexel University, p 116Google Scholar
- 23.El-Hag AH, Jayaram SH, Cherney EA (2004) Comparison between silicone rubber containing micro- and nano-size silica fillers. In: The 17th annual meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society, 2004. LEOS 2004, pp 385–388Google Scholar
- 24.Momen G, Farzaneh M (2011) Survey of micro/nano filler use to improve silicone rubber for outdoor insulators. Rev Adv Mater Sci 27:1–13Google Scholar
- 25.Donnet J-B, Voet A (1976) Carbon black: physics, chemistry, and elastomer reinforcement. M. Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 30.Grand View Research (2016) Carbon black market analysis by application and segment forecasts to 2022. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/carbon-black-market. Accessed Aug 2, 2017