Advertisement

Journal of Polymers and the Environment

, Volume 27, Issue 12, pp 2867–2877 | Cite as

Microwave Assisted Synthesis and Carboxymethyl Cellulose Stabilized Copper Nanoparticles on Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibers Support for Pollutants Degradation

  • Tahseen KamalEmail author
  • Ikram Ahmad
  • Sher Bahadar Khan
  • Mazhar Ul-Islam
  • Abdullah M. AsiriEmail author
Original paper
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

Bacterial cellulose (BC), a green biopolymer synthesized by certain bacteria, has been widely used for supporting different metal or their oxide nanoparticles which were utilized for different purposes. In this article, we report on using BC as a support for transition metal nanoparticles for catalysis purpose of organic pollutants. BC was synthesized using Gluconacetobacter xylinum. Then the copper (Cu) nanoparticles were synthesized by a quick procedure of microwave heating of the CuSO4 and hydrazine mixed aqueous solution in the presence of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). Typically, 10 μL suspension of the CMC stabilized Cu nanoparticles was coated on the BC nanofibers (CMC-Cu-BC) and further used for the catalytic reductions of methylene blue, 4-nitrophenol and in their mixed solution by sodium borohydride. All the samples were also characterized by X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, and field emission scanning electron microscope. Our finding suggests that supported Cu nanoparticles catalyst performance was slower than its suspension. However, the ease of separation of the supported CMC-Cu-BC was appealing to be used.

Keywords

Carboxymethyl cellulose Bacterial cellulose Copper nanoparticles Catalyst 4-Nitrophenol Methylene blue 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant No. (DF-004-130-1441). The authors, therefore, gratefully acknowledge DSR technical and financial support.

Supplementary material

10924_2019_1565_MOESM1_ESM.docx (36 kb)
Supplementary information 1 (DOCX 37 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kamal T, Ali N, Naseem AA et al (2016) Polymer nanocomposite membranes for antifouling nanofiltration. Recent Pat Nanotechnol 10:189–201.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1872210510666160429145704 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kavitha T, Haider S, Kamal T, Ul-Islam M (2017) Thermal decomposition of metal complex precursor as route to the synthesis of Co3O4 nanoparticles: antibacterial activity and mechanism. J Alloys Compd 704:296–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vanhulle S, Trovaslet M, Enaud E et al (2008) Decolorization, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity reduction during a combined ozonation/fungal treatment of dye-contaminated wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 42:584–589.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es071300k CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kamal T, Ul-Islam M, Khan SB, Asiri AM (2015) Adsorption and photocatalyst assisted dye removal and bactericidal performance of ZnO/chitosan coating layer. Int J Biol Macromol 81:584–590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.08.060 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kamal T, Anwar Y, Khan SB et al (2016) Dye adsorption and bactericidal properties of TiO2/chitosan coating layer. Carbohydr Polym 148:153–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.042 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khan SB, Ali F, Kamal T et al (2016) CuO embedded chitosan spheres as antibacterial adsorbent for dyes. Int J Biol Macromol 88:113–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.03.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ali N, Awais Kamal T et al (2018) Chitosan-coated cotton cloth supported copper nanoparticles for toxic dye reduction. Int J Biol Macromol 111:832–838.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.092 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Basava Rao VV, Ram Mohan Rao S (2006) Adsorption studies on treatment of textile dyeing industrial effluent by flyash. Chem Eng J 116:77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2005.09.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kamal T (2019) Aminophenols formation from nitrophenols using agar biopolymer hydrogel supported CuO nanoparticles catalyst. Polym Test 77:105896.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kamal T, Ahmad I, Khan SB, Asiri AM (2018) Agar hydrogel supported metal nanoparticles catalyst for pollutants degradation in water. Desalin Water Treat 136:290–298.  https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2018.23230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khan MSJ, Khan SB, Kamal T, Asiri AM (2019) Agarose biopolymer coating on polyurethane sponge as host for catalytic silver metal nanoparticles. Polym Test 78:105983.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kavitha T, Kumar S, Prasad V et al (2019) NiO powder synthesized through nickel metal complex degradation for water treatment. Desalin Water Treat 155:216–224.  https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.24054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haider A, Haider S, Kang I-K et al (2018) A novel use of cellulose based filter paper containing silver nanoparticles for its potential application as wound dressing agent. Int J Biol Macromol 108:455–461.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khan SA, Khan SB, Kamal T et al (2016) Antibacterial nanocomposites based on chitosan/Co-MCM as a selective and efficient adsorbent for organic dyes. Int J Biol Macromol 91:744–751.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.06.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ali F, Khan SB, Kamal T et al (2018) Chitosan-titanium oxide fibers supported zero-valent nanoparticles: highly efficient and easily retrievable catalyst for the removal of organic pollutants. Sci Rep 8:6260.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24311-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khan MSJ, Kamal T, Ali F et al (2019) Chitosan-coated polyurethane sponge supported metal nanoparticles for catalytic reduction of organic pollutants. Int J Biol Macromol 132:772–783.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.205 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ali F, Khan SB, Kamal T et al (2017) Chitosan coated cotton cloth supported zero-valent nanoparticles: simple but economically viable, efficient and easily retrievable catalysts. Sci Rep 7:16957.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16815-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Al-Mubaddel FS, Haider S, Aijaz MO et al (2017) Preparation of the chitosan/polyacrylonitrile semi-IPN hydrogel via glutaraldehyde vapors for the removal of Rhodamine B dye. Polym Bull 74:1535–1551.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-016-1788-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kamal T, Ahmad I, Khan SB, Asiri AM (2017) Synthesis and catalytic properties of silver nanoparticles supported on porous cellulose acetate sheets and wet-spun fibers. Carbohydr Polym 157:294–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.078 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khan SB, Khan SA, Marwani HM et al (2016) Anti-bacterial PES-cellulose composite spheres: dual character toward extraction and catalytic reduction of nitrophenol. RSC Adv 6:110077–110090.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra21626a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ali F, Khan SB, Kamal T et al (2017) Bactericidal and catalytic performance of green nanocomposite based-on chitosan/carbon black fiber supported monometallic and bimetallic nanoparticles. Chemosphere 188:588–598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.118 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ahmed MS, Kamal T, Khan SA et al (2016) Assessment of anti-bacterial ni-al/chitosan composite spheres for adsorption assisted photo-degradation of organic pollutants. Curr Nanosci 12:569–575.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1573413712666160204000517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hokkanen S, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2016) A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity. Water Res 91:156–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kamal T, Ahmad I, Khan SB, Asiri AM (2019) Bacterial cellulose as support for biopolymer stabilized catalytic cobalt nanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol 135:1162–1170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.057 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gopinathan R, Bhowal A, Garlapati C (2017) Adsorption characteristics of activated carbon for the reclamation of colored effluents containing orange g and new solid-liquid phase equilibrium model. J Chem Eng Data 62:558–567.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.6b00845 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rahman MM, Khan SB, Marwani HM et al (2014) Facile synthesis of doped ZnO-CdO nanoblocks as solid-phase adsorbent and efficient solar photo-catalyst applications. J Ind Eng Chem 20:2278–2286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.09.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lu P-J, Lin H-C, Yu W-T, Chern J-M (2011) Chemical regeneration of activated carbon used for dye adsorption. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 42:305–311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2010.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee S-H, Kwon D-Y (2016) Development of activated carbon auto-regeneration system for water treatment filtration. Desalination Water Treat 57:8026–8032.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1080630 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kamal T, Khan SB, Asiri AM (2016) Synthesis of zero-valent Cu nanoparticles in the chitosan coating layer on cellulose microfibers: evaluation of azo dyes catalytic reduction. Cellulose 23:1911–1923.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0919-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kamal T, Khan SB, Asiri AM (2016) Nickel nanoparticles-chitosan composite coated cellulose filter paper: an efficient and easily recoverable dip-catalyst for pollutants degradation. Environ Pollut 218:625–633.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.046 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fang Y, Guo Y (2018) Copper-based non-precious metal heterogeneous catalysts for environmental remediation. Chin J Catal 39:566–582.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62996-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ahmad I, Khan SB, Kamal T, Asiri AM (2017) Visible light activated degradation of organic pollutants using zinc–iron selenide. J Mol Liq 229:429–435.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.12.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ali F, Khan SB, Kamal T et al (2018) Synthesis and characterization of metal nanoparticles templated chitosan-SiO2 catalyst for the reduction of nitrophenols and dyes. Carbohydr Polym 192:217–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Khan FU, Asimullah, Khan SB et al (2017) Novel combination of zero-valent Cu and Ag nanoparticles @ cellulose acetate nanocomposite for the reduction of 4-nitro phenol. Int J Biol Macromol 102:868–877.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.062 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kamal T, Khan SB, Haider S et al (2017) Thin layer chitosan-coated cellulose filter paper as substrate for immobilization of catalytic cobalt nanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol 104:56–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.157 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ali F, Khan SB, Kamal T et al (2017) Anti-bacterial chitosan/zinc phthalocyanine fibers supported metallic and bimetallic nanoparticles for the removal of organic pollutants. Carbohydr Polym 173:676–689.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.05.074 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haider S, Kamal T, Khan SB et al (2016) Natural polymers supported copper nanoparticles for pollutants degradation. Appl Surf Sci 387:1154–1161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sreeju N, Rufus A, Philip D (2016) Microwave-assisted rapid synthesis of copper nanoparticles with exceptional stability and their multifaceted applications. J Mol Liq 221:1008–1021.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.06.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jing J, Li L, Chu W et al (2018) Microwave-assisted synthesis of high performance copper-based catalysts for hydrogen production from methanol decomposition. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:12059–12068.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tankhiwale R, Bajpai SK (2009) Graft copolymerization onto cellulose-based filter paper and its further development as silver nanoparticles loaded antibacterial food-packaging material. Colloids Surf B 69:164–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lv P, Xu W, Li D et al (2016) Metal-based bacterial cellulose of sandwich nanomaterials for anti-oxidation electromagnetic interference shielding. Mater Des 112:374–382.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Foresti ML, Vázquez A, Boury B (2017) Applications of bacterial cellulose as precursor of carbon and composites with metal oxide, metal sulfide and metal nanoparticles: a review of recent advances. Carbohydr Polym 157:447–467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chen M, Kang H, Gong Y et al (2015) Bacterial cellulose supported gold nanoparticles with excellent catalytic properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:21717–21726.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b07150 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ahmad I, Kamal T, Khan SB, Asiri AM (2016) An efficient and easily retrievable dip catalyst based on silver nanoparticles/chitosan-coated cellulose filter paper. Cellulose 23:3577–3588.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1053-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kamal T (2017) High performance NiO decorated graphene as a potential H2 gas sensor. J Alloys Compd 729:1058–1063.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Khalid A, Khan R, Ul-Islam M et al (2017) Bacterial cellulose-zinc oxide nanocomposites as a novel dressing system for burn wounds. Carbohydr Polym 164:214–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.061 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Khattak WA, Khan T, Ul-Islam M et al (2015) Production, characterization and biological features of bacterial cellulose from scum obtained during preparation of sugarcane jaggery (gur). J Food Sci Technol 52:8343–8349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1936-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sedighi A, Montazer M, Samadi N (2014) Synthesis of nano Cu2O on cotton: Morphological, physical, biological and optical sensing characterizations. Carbohydr Polym 110:489–498.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wajid Ullah M, Ul-Islam M, Khan S et al (2016) In situ synthesis of a bio-cellulose/titanium dioxide nanocomposite by using a cell-free system. RSC Adv 6:22424–22435.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA26704H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ghosh BK, Hazra S, Naik B, Ghosh NN (2015) Preparation of Cu nanoparticle loaded SBA-15 and their excellent catalytic activity in reduction of variety of dyes. Powder Technol 269:371–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.09.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Torkamani F, Azizian S (2016) Green and simple synthesis of Ag nanoparticles loaded onto cellulosic fiber as efficient and low-cost catalyst for reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J Mol Liq 214:270–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2015.12.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Su R, Li Q, Huang R et al (2018) Biomass-based soft hydrogel for triple use: Adsorbent for metal removal, template for metal nanoparticle synthesis, and a reactor for nitrophenol and methylene blue reduction. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 91:235–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Khan MM, Lee J, Cho MH (2014) Au@TiO2 nanocomposites for the catalytic degradation of methyl orange and methylene blue: An electron relay effect. J Ind Eng Chem 20:1584–1590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hu M, Yan X, Hu X et al (2019) Synthesis of silver decorated silica nanoparticles with rough surfaces as adsorbent and catalyst for methylene blue removal. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 89:754–763.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-018-4871-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Khan SA, Khan SB, Kamal T et al (2016) Recent development of chitosan nanocomposites for environmental applications. Recent Pat Nanotechnol 10:181–188.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1872210510666160429145339 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sudarsan S, Franklin DS, Sakthivel M et al (2018) Ecofriendly pH-tunable hydrogels for removal of perilous thiazine dye. J Polym Environ 26:3773–3784.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-018-1258-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Şimşek S, Ulusoy Hİ (2018) Synthesis of a useful and economic polymeric material for effective removal of bisphenol A. J Polym Environ 26:1605–1612.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-1067-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Center of Excellence for Advanced Materials ResearchKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryUniversity of LahoreLahorePakistan
  4. 4.Department of Chemical Engineering, College of EngineeringDhofar UniversitySalalahOman

Personalised recommendations