Advertisement

Journal of Polymers and the Environment

, Volume 27, Issue 11, pp 2552–2561 | Cite as

Physicochemical, Microstructural and Thermal Characterization of Chitosan from Blue Crab Shell Waste and Its Bioactivity Characteristics

  • Cansu Metin
  • Yunus AlparslanEmail author
  • Tuba Baygar
  • Taçnur Baygar
Original paper
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to characterize the chitosan synthesized from blue crab (Callinectes sapidus, Rathbun, 1986) shell waste and to investigate its physicochemical and microstructural analyses as well as its antioxidant and antibacterial potentials. Microstructural and elemental characterization of the synthesized and commercial chitosan powders were performed using fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Thermal analysis were done using thermogravimetric analysis. Antioxidant and antimicrobial analysis were done using by DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) free radical scavenging assay and agar well diffusion assay, respectively. The yield of the synthesized chitosan was calculated as 7.47% with moisture and ash contents of 0.151 ± 0.0025% and 0.19 ± 0.01%, respectively. Synthesized chitosan demonstrated the values of degree of deacetylation (71%), water (620.029 ± 52.59%) and fat (437.93 ± 15.92%) binding capacities, solubility (94.15 ± 2.84%), viscosity (463.25 ± 13.10 cPs) and whiteness (90.23 ± 0.27%). Antioxidant activity of synthesized chitosan was found to be moderate (55.30 ± 5.05%) when compared to ascorbic acid standard (87.61 ± 1.34). Chitosan obtained from blue crab shell also showed moderate antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. The findings of the study indicated that blue crab shell waste might be a potentially effective biopolymer source for commercial applications especially in food industry.

Keywords

Blue crab Waste Chitosan Characterization Bioactivity 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Mauricio-Sánchez RA, Salazar R, Luna-Bárcenas JG, Mendoza-Galván A (2018) FTIR spectroscopy studies on the spontaneous neutralization of chitosan acetate films by moisture conditioning. Vib Spectrosc 94:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sugiyanti D, Darmadji P, Anggrahini S, Anwar C, Santoso U (2018) Preparation and characterization of chitosan from Indonesian Tambak Lorok shrimp shell waste and crab shell waste. Pak J Nutr 17(9):446–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Demir A, Seventekin N (2009) Chitin, chitosan and general application areas. Electron J Text Technol 3(2):92–103Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumari S, Annamareddy SHK, Abanti S, Rath PK (2017) Physicochemical properties and characterization of chitosan synthesized from fish scales, crab and shrimp shells. Int J Biol Macromol 104:1697–1705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Özbay T, Baştürk Ö, Sungur MA (2012) The efficiency of chitin and chitosan of shell waste of Manta shrimp (Squilla sp.), squid (Sepia sp.) and blue crab (Callinectes sapidus, Rathbun, 1896). Yunus Res Bullet 12(1):13–19Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Üçgül İ, Aras S, Özdemir Küçükçapraz D (2016) Purification of the chitin from different sources material and textile applications. Erzincan Univ J Sci Technol 9(1):46–56Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tharanathan RN, Kittur FS (2003) Chitin-the undisputed biomolecule of great potential. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 43:61–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Demir D, Öfkeli F, Ceylan S, Bölgen Karagülle N (2016) Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from blue crab and synthesis of chitosan cryogel scaffolds. J Turk Chem Soc, Sect A: Chem 3(3):131–144Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    AOAC (2006) Moisture of meat. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Method 950.46, Gaitherburg M.DGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    AOAC (2006a) Ash of meat. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Method 950.153, Gaitherburg M.DGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    CIE (1976) Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. 18th session, CIE Publication 36, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seo S, King JM, Prinyawiwatkul W (2007) Simultaneous depolymerisation and decolorization of chitosan by ozone treatment. J Food Sci 72(9):522–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sarbon NM, Sandanamsamy S, Kamaruzaman SFS, Ahmad F (2015) Chitosan extracted from mud crab (Scylla olivicea) shells: physicochemical and antioxidant properties. J Food Sci Technol 52(7):4266–4275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nessa F, Masum SM, Asaduzzaman M, Roy SK, Hossain MM, Jahan MS (2010) A Process for the preparation of chitin and chitosan from prawn shell waste. Bangladesh J Sci Ind Res 45(4):323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan TA, Peh KK, Ch’ng HS (2002) Reporting degree of deacetylation values of chitosan: the influence of analytical methods. J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci 5(3):205–212Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset CLWT (1995) Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci Technol 28(1):25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mensor LL, Menezes FS, Leitão GG, Reis AS, Santos TCD, Coube CS, Leitão SG (2001) Screening of Brazilian plant extracts for antioxidant activity by the use of DPPH free radical method. Phytother Res 15(2):127–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    NCCLS (1993) Performance standards for antimicrobial disc suspectibility tests. Approved Standard NCCLS Publication M2-A5, Villanova, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hajji S, Younes I, Ghorbel-Bellaaj O, Hajji R, Rinaudo M, Nasri M, Jellouli K (2014) Structural differences between chitin and chitosan extracted from three different marine sources. Int J Biol Macromol 65:298–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hamdi M, Hajji S, Affes S, Taktak W, Maâlej H, Nasri M, Nasri R (2018) Development of a controlled bioconversion process for the recovery of chitosan from blue crab (Portunus segnis) exoskeleton. Food Hydrocol 77:534–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baron RD, Pérez LL, Salcedo JM, Córdoba LP, do Amaral Sobral PJ (2017) Production and characterization of films based on blends of chitosan from blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) waste and pectin from orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) peel. Int J Biol Macromol 98:676–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Küçükgülmez A (2018) Extraction of chitin from crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus) shell waste. Alınteri J Agric Sci 33(1):99–104Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hossain MS, Iqbal A (2014) Production and characterization of chitosan from shrimp waste. J Bangladesh Agril Univ 12(1):153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fernandez-Kim SO (2004) Physicochemical and functional properties of crawfish chitosan as affected by different processing protocols. BS, Seoul National University, LSU Master's Theses, p 53Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ocloo FCK, Quayson ET, Adu-Gyamfi A, Quarcoo EA, Asare D, Serfor-Armah Y, Woode BK (2011) Physicochemical and functional characteristics of radiation-processed shrimp chitosan. Radiat Phys Chem 80(7):837–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Parthiban F, Balasundari S, Gopalakannan A, Rathnakumar K, Felix S (2017) Comparison of the quality of chitin and chitosan from shrimp, crab and squilla waste. Curr World Environ 12(3):672–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodríguez-Núñez JR, Madera-Santana TJ, Sánchez-Machado DI, López-Cervantes J, Valdez HS (2014) Chitosan/hydrophilic plasticizer-based films: preparation, physicochemical and antimicrobial properties. J Polym Environ 22(1):41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    No HK, Meyers SP (1995) Preparation and characterization of chitin and chitosan-a review. J Aquat Food Prod Technol 4(2):27–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nouri M, Khodaiyan F, Razavi SH, Mousavi MA (2016) The effect of different chemical and physical processing on the physicochemical and functional characterization of chitosan extracted from shrimp waste species of Indian white shrimp. Prog Rubber Plast Re 32(1):39–54Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Potivas T, Laokuldilok T (2014) Deacetylation of chitin and the properties of chitosan films with various deacetylation degrees. CMU J Nat Sci 13(1):559–567Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yen MT, Yang JH, Mau JL (2009) Physicochemical characterization of chitin and chitosan from crab shells. Carbohydr Polym 75(1):15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thakur VK, Thakur MK (2014) Recent advances in graft copolymerization and applications of chitosan: a review. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2(12):2637–2652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kumari S, Rath P, Kumar ASH, Tiwari TN (2015) Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from fishery waste by chemical method. Environ Technol Innov 3:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Limam Z, Selmi S, Sadok S, El Abed A (2011) Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from crustacean by-products: Biological and physicochemical properties. African J Biotechnol 10(4):640–647Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li Q, Dunn ET, Grandmaison EW, Goosen MF (1992) Applications and properties of chitosan. J Bioact Compat Polym 7(4):370–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    No HK, Hur EY (1998) Control of foam formation by antifoam during demineralization of crustacean shell in preparation of chitin. J Agric Food Chem 46(9):3844–3846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Knaul JZ, Hudson SM, Creber KA (1999) Crosslinking of chitosan fibers with dialdehydes: proposal of a new reaction mechanism. J Polym Sci Part-B Polym Phys 37(11):1079–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Muzzarelli RAA, Muzzarelli C (2005) Chitosan chemistry: Relevance to the biomedical sciences. Adv Polym Sci 186:151–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jian Y, Feng T, Zheng W, Qing W, Yan-Jun Z, ShiQian C (2008) Effect of chitosan molecular weight and deacetylation degree on hemostasis. J Biomed Mater Res 84B:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    de Andrade SM, Ladchumananandasivam R, da Rocha BG, Belarmino DD, Galvão AO (2012) The use of exoskeletons of shrimp (Litopenaeus vanammei) and crab (Ucides cordatus) for the extraction of chitosan and production of nanomembrane. Mater Sci Appl 3(7):495–508Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kaya M, Seyyar O, Baran T, Turkes T (2014) Bat guano as new and attractive chitin and chitosan source. Front Zool 11(1):59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ramasamy P, Subhapradha N, Thinesh T, Selvin J, Selvan KM, Shanmugam V, Shanmugam A (2017) Characterization of bioactive chitosan and sulfated chitosan from Doryteuthis singhalensis (Ortmann, 1891). Int J Biol Macromol 99:682–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hosseinnejad M, Jafari SM (2016) Evaluation of different factors affecting antimicrobial properties of chitosan. Int J Biol Macromol 85:467–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hajji S, Younes I, Rinaudo M, Jellouli K, Nasri M (2015) Characterization and in vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of chitosans extracted from three different marine sources. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 177(1):18–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Darmadji P, Izumimoto M (1994) Effect of chitosan in meat preservation. Meat Sci 38(2):243–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zheng LY, Zhu JF (2003) Study on antimicrobial activity of chitosan with different molecular weights. Carbohydr Polym 54(4):527–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of FisheriesMugla Sitki Kocman UniversityMuğlaTurkey
  2. 2.Research Laboratories CenterMugla Sitki Kocman UniversityMuğlaTurkey

Personalised recommendations