Advertisement

Fabrication of Seashell-Incorporated Polyurethane for Sustainable Remediation of Fe(II)-Contaminated Acidic Wastewater

  • Choe Earn Choong
  • Gooyong Lee
  • Min Jang
  • Chang Min Park
  • Shaliza Ibrahim
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, seashell-incorporated polyurethane (SPU) was synthesized for sustainable remediation of Fe(II)-contaminated acidic wastewater. Several batch and column experiments were conducted to find optimal seashell/PU ratio, particle size, bed volume and retention time. Seashell/PU ratio of 20 wt%, with high chemical stability, was found to be the optimum proportion with maximum Fe(II) removal capacity of 277.1 mg-Fe(II)/g-seashell. The primary removal mechanisms were adsorption and precipitation as ferric hydroxide and ferric carbonate. Crushed seashell with the particle diameter of 0.13 mm ≤ Ø < 0.15 mm posed the highest Fe(II) removal capacity. SPU, with the enhanced hydro-conductivity of the crushed seashell, showed consistent Fe(II) removal capacity (237.5 mg-Fe(II)/g-seashell) in both batch and column experiments. Large bed volumes increased Fe(II) removal efficiency, but the increment was not directly proportional to the removal efficiency. The breakthrough curve was also found to fit well to Yoon–Nelson Kinetic model and Thomas kinetic model with the determination coefficient of 0.867–0.987. In overall, SPU can be considered as a sustainable alternative for a low-cost absorbent for heavy metal contaminated acidic wastewater.

Keywords

Seashell waste Polyurethane Acidic wastewater Ferrous ion Acid mine drainage 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Postgraduate Research Grant (PPP) (PG210-2015B) and Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1A6A1A03024962). The authors wish to thank Dr. Nuruol Syuhadaa Mohd for proof read the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10924_2018_1339_MOESM1_ESM.docx (41 kb)
Supplementary material 1 Pore size distribution of SPU was illustrated. (DOCX 40 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Egiebor NO, Oni B (2007) Acid rock drainage formation and treatment: a review. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng 2(1):47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akcil A, Koldas S (2006) Acid mine drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies. J Clean Prod 14(12):1139–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singh R, Gautam N, Mishra A, Gupta R (2011) Heavy metals and living systems: an overview. Indian J Pharmacol 43(3):246–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gartman A, Findlay AJ, Luther Iii GW (2014) Nanoparticulate pyrite and other nanoparticles are a widespread component of hydrothermal vent black smoker emissions. Chem Geol 366:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kamal NM, Sulaiman SK (2014) Passive treatment of acid mine drainage with limestone, calcareous rock and serpentinite. In: Aris AZ et al (eds) From sources to solution: proceedings of the international conference on environmental forensics 2013. Springer, Singapore, pp 209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kossoff D, Dubbin WE, Alfredsson M, Edwards SJ, Macklin MG, Hudson-Edwards KA (2014) Mine tailings dams: characteristics, failure, environmental impacts, and remediation. Appl Geochem 51:229–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang T, Tu Z, Lu G, Duan X, Yi X, Guo C, Dang Z (2017) Removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage using chicken eggshells in column mode. J Environ Manag 188:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bunce NJ, Chartrand M, Keech P (2001) Electrochemical treatment of acidic aqueous ferrous sulfate and copper sulfate as models for acid mine drainage. Water Res 35(18):4410–4416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wadekar SS, Hayes T, Lokare OR, Mittal D, Vidic RD (2017) Laboratory and pilot-scale nanofiltration treatment of abandoned mine drainage for the recovery of products suitable for industrial reuse. Ind Eng Chem Res 56(25):7355–7364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eladlani N, Dahmane EM, Ouahrouch A, Rhazi M, Taourirte M (2017) Recovery of chromium(III) from tannery wastewater by nanoparticles and whiskers of chitosan. J Polym Environ 26:152–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jin K, Zhang T, Yuan S, Tang S (2018) Regulation of isobutane/1-butene adsorption behaviors on the acidic ionic liquids-functionalized MCM-22 zeolite. Chin J Chem Eng 26(1):127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang J, Zhang P, Yang L, Huang T (2015) Adsorption characteristics of construction waste for heavy metals from urban stormwater runoff. Chin JChem Eng 23(9):1542–1550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang J, Yang Q, Yang W, Pei H, Zhang L, Zhang T, Hu N, Suo Y, Wang J (2018) Adsorptive catalysis of hierarchical porous heteroatom-doped biomass: from recovered heavy metal to efficient pollutant decontamination. J Mater Chem A 6(34):16690–16698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu D, Chen Z, Long J, Zhao Y, Du X (2018) Immobilization of penicillin acylase on macroporous adsorption resin CLX1180 carrier. Adv Polym Technol 37(3):753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang YQ, Yang XB, Wang ZX, Long J, Shao L (2017) Designing multifunctional 3D magnetic foam for effective insoluble oil separation and rapid selective dye removal for use in wastewater remediation. J Mater Chem A 5(16):7316–7325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heviánková S, Bestová I, Kyncl M (2014) The application of wood ash as a reagent in acid mine drainage treatment. Miner Eng 56:109–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Champagne P, Li C (2009) Use of Sphagnum peat moss and crushed mollusk shells in fixed-bed columns for the treatment of synthetic landfill leachate. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 11(4):339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lora JH, Glasser WG (2002) Recent industrial applications of lignin: a sustainable alternative to nonrenewable materials. J Polym Environ 10(1):39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bekri-Abbes I, Bayoudh S, Baklouti M (2006) Converting waste polystyrene into adsorbent: potential use in the removal of lead and cadmium ions from aqueous solution. J Polym Environ 14(3):249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jung J-H, Lee J-J, Lee G-W, Yoo K-S, Shon B-H (2012) Reuse of waste shells as a SO2/NOx removal sorbent. Mater Recycl: Trends Perspect.  https://doi.org/10.5772/33887 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jung JH, Shon BH, Yoo KS, Oh KJ (2000) Physicochemical characteristics of waste sea shells for acid gas cleaning absorbent. Korean J Chem Eng 17(5):585–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohamed M, Yusup S, Maitra S (2012) Decomposition study of calcium carbonate in cockle shell. J Eng Sci Technol 7(1):1–10Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Masukume M, Onyango MS, Maree JP (2014) Sea shell derived adsorbent and its potential for treating acid mine drainage. Int J Miner Process 133:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Uster B, O’Sullivan AD, Ko SY, Evans A, Pope J, Trumm D, Caruso B (2014) The use of mussel shells in upward-flow sulfate-reducing bioreactors treating acid mine drainage. Mine Water Environ 34(4):442–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goetz ER, Riefler RG (2014) Performance of steel slag leach beds in acid mine drainage treatment. Chem Eng J 240:579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vafaeifard M, Lee G, Akib S, Ibrahim S, Yoon Y, Jang M (2016) Facile and economic one-pot synthesis of rigid functional-polyurethane for the effective treatment of heavy metal-contaminated urban storm water run-off. Desalin Water Treat 57(54):26114–26129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Choi H, Woo NC, Jang M, Cannon FS, Snyder SA (2014) Magnesium oxide impregnated polyurethane to remove high levels of manganese cations from water. Sep Purif Technol 136:184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thomas HC (1944) Heterogeneous ion exchange in a flowing system. J Am Chem Soc 66(10):1664–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lim AP, Aris AZ (2014) Continuous fixed-bed column study and adsorption modeling: removal of cadmium(II) and lead(II) ions in aqueous solution by dead calcareous skeletons. Biochem Eng J 87:50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cao N, Yang B, Barras A, Szunerits S, Boukherroub R (2017) Polyurethane sponge functionalized with superhydrophobic nanodiamond particles for efficient oil/water separation. Chem Eng J 307(Suppl C):319–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shafiu Kamba A, Ismail M, Tengku Ibrahim TA, Zakaria ZAB (2013) Synthesis and characterisation of calcium carbonate aragonite nanocrystals from cockle shell powder (Anadara granosa). J Nanomater 2013:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shim Y-S, Kim Y-K, Kong S-H, Rhee S-W, Lee W-K (2003) The adsorption characteristics of heavy metals by various particle sizes of MSWI bottom ash. Waste Manag 23(9):851–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hammarstrom JM, Sibrell PL, Belkin HE (2003) Characterization of limestone reacted with acid-mine drainage in a pulsed limestone bed treatment system at the Friendship Hill National Historical Site, Pennsylvania, USA. Appl Geochem 18(11):1705–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    De Michelis I, Ferella F, Beolchini F, Vegliò F (2009) Reducing acid leaching of manganiferous ore: effect of the iron removal operation on solid waste disposal. Waste Manag 29(1):128–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Piszczyk Ł, Hejna A, Formela K, Danowska M, Strankowski M (2015) Effect of ground tire rubber on structural, mechanical and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foams. Iran Polym J 24(1):75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Luo X, Deng Z, Lin X, Zhang C (2011) Fixed-bed column study for Cu2+ removal from solution using expanding rice husk. J Hazard Mater 187(1–3):182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Al-Mamun A, Zainuddin Z (2013) Sustainable river water quality management in Malaysia. IIUM Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v14i1.266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    De Gisi S, Lofrano G, Grassi M, Notarnicola M (2016) Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: a review. Sustain Mater Technol 9:10–40Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mackenzie PD, Horney DP, Sivavec TM (1999) Mineral precipitation and porosity losses in granular iron columns. J Hazard Mater 68(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nazari G, Abolghasemi H, Esmaieli M, Sadeghi Pouya E (2016) Aqueous phase adsorption of cephalexin by walnut shell-based activated carbon: a fixed-bed column study. Appl Surf Sci 375(Suppl C):144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gong J-L, Zhang Y-L, Jiang Y, Zeng G-M, Cui Z-H, Liu K, Deng C-H, Niu Q-Y, Deng J-H, Huan S-Y (2015) Continuous adsorption of Pb(II) and methylene blue by engineered graphite oxide coated sand in fixed-bed column. Appl Surf Sci 330(Suppl C):148–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sylvia N, Hakim L, Fardian N, Yunardi (2018) Adsorption performance of fixed-bed column for the removal of Fe(II) in groundwater using activated carbon made from palm kernel shells. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 334(1):012030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hodaifa G, Alami SBD, Ochando-Pulido JM, Víctor-Ortega MD (2014) Iron removal from liquid effluents by olive stones on adsorption column: breakthrough curves. Ecol Eng 73:270–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Allahdin O, Dehou SC, Wartel M, Recourt P, Trentesaux M, Mabingui J, Boughriet A (2013) Performance of FeOOH-brick based composite for Fe(II) removal from water in fixed bed column and mechanistic aspects. Chem Eng Res Des 91(12):2732–2742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tahir SS, Rauf N (2004) Removal of Fe(II) from the wastewater of a galvanized pipe manufacturing industry by adsorption onto bentonite clay. J Environ Manag 73(4):285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yan H, Li H, Tao X, Li K, Yang H, Li A, Xiao S, Cheng R (2014) Rapid removal and separation of iron(II) and manganese(II) from micropolluted water using magnetic graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(12):9871–9880CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Division of Policy Research, Green Technology CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Environmental EngineeringKwangwoon UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.Department of Environmental EngineeringKyungpook National UniversityDaeguRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations