Application of Poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB)-Based Biodegradable Plastic as Artificial Substratum in Litopenaeus vannamei Culture
- 126 Downloads
The use of artificial substratum made out of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) based biodegradable plastic for penaeid shrimp culture was investigated for the first time. Provision of PHB substratum consisting of PHB type P209 (Biomer, Krailling, Germany) to postlarval whiteleg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (106 ± 52 mg) resulted in significantly higher survival (P ≤ 0.05) of 83.6 ± 3.4% as compared to 73.9 ± 3.0% for postlarvae provided with conventional substratum consisting of polyvinylchloride (PVC) pipes. Results on final weight showed significantly higher weight (P ≤ 0.05) of 1008.2 ± 4.5 mg in postlarval whiteleg shrimp provided PHB substratum as compared to 893.4 ± 30.0 mg for postlarvae provided with PVC substratum. The trends of higher visit and preference by postlarval whiteleg shrimp on 10-day and 70-day aged PHB substrata over 10-day and 70-day aged PVC substrata suggest the importance of PHB substratum as grazing area rather than as shelter. Test conducted on water quality also showed a trend towards higher total ammonia-nitrogen (TAN) conversion from an initial concentration of 1.75 ± 0.0 mg L−1 to 0.35 mg ± 0.04 mg L−1 after 72 h with PHB substratum while using no substratum and PVC substratum lead to TAN concentrations of 1.28 ± 0.06 mg L−1 and 1.23 ± 0.10 mg L−1, respectively. Overall, this study indicates that artificial substratum consisting of PHB-based biodegradable plastic increases the quality of postlarval whiteleg shrimp and that it contributes to maintaining good water quality.
KeywordsPHB-based biodegradable plastic sheets Whiteleg shrimp Survival Growth Water quality
The authors highly acknowledge U.J. Hanggi of the Biomer company (Krailling, Germany) for kindly providing PHB type P209.
This study was funded by the Flemish Interuniversity Council (VLIR). Peter DS is supported as a post-doctoral research fellow of the Research Fund – Flanders (FWO, Belgium).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Zhang B, Lin W, Huang J, Wang Y, Xu R (2010) Effects of artificial substrates on the growth, survival and spatial distribution of Litopenaeus vannamei in the intensive culture condition. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences 9(2):293–304Google Scholar
- 5.Zhang J, Chen L, Dong H, Duan Y, Li Z, Wen G, Chen J, Feng Z, Xu W, Xie J (2016) Artificial substrates in zero-water-exchange culture system regulate the rearing performance of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) under the winter indoor condition. Aquac Res 47(1):91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Pradeep B, Pandey PK, Ayyappan S (2003) Effect of probiotics and antibiotics on water quality and bacterial flora. J Inland Fish Soc India 35(2):68–72Google Scholar
- 13.Audelo-Naranjo M, Martínez-Córdova LR, Gómez-Jiménez S, Voltolina D (2012) Intensive culture of Litopenaeus vannamei without water exchange and with an artificial substrate. Hidrobiológica 22(1):1–7Google Scholar
- 15.Garcia B, Olivera ER, Minambres B, Fernandez-Valverde M, Canedo LM, Prieto MA, Garcia JL, Martinez M, Luengo JM (1999) Novel biodegradable aromatic plastics from a bacterial source. Genetic and biochemical studies on a route of the phenylacetyl-CoA catabolon. J Biol Chem 274(41):29228–29241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Halet D, Defoirdt T, Van Damme P, Vervaeren H, Forrez I, Van de Wiele T, Boon N, Sorgeloos P, Bossier P, Verstraete W (2007) Poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate-accumulating bacteria protect gnotobiotic Artemia franciscana from pathogenic Vibrio campbellii. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 60:363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.De Schryver P (2010) Poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate as a microbial agent in aquaculture. PhD thesis, Ghent University, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- 28.Chung H, Lee O, Huang Y, Mok S, Kolter R, Qian P (2010) Bacterial community succession and chemical profiles of subtidal biofilms in relation to larval settlement of the polychaete Hydroides elegans. Int Soc Microb Ecol 4(6):817–828Google Scholar