Advertisement

Journal of Polymers and the Environment

, Volume 26, Issue 9, pp 3745–3753 | Cite as

Deproteinized Natural Rubber as an Electrically Controllable, Transdermal Drug-Delivery Patch

  • Apisit Banpean
  • Nophawan Paradee
  • Anuvat Sirivat
  • Sumonman Niamlang
Original Paper
  • 140 Downloads

Abstract

A soft transdermal drug-delivery (TDD) patch composed of deproteinized natural rubber (DPNR) was fabricated in this work. Sulindac (Sul), an anionic drug, was loaded on the DPNR patch using silicone oil as a plasticizer. The in vitro release-permeation behavior of Sul from the Sul-loaded DPNR patch was studied by using a modified Franz diffusion cell at a pH of 7.4 and temperature of 37 °C. A cytotoxicity test of the DPNR with silicone oil (DPNR-Si) patch was performed, and the viability percentage was 90%. When external electrical potentials of 0–9 V were applied, the maximum amounts of Sul released and permeated from the Sul-loaded DPNR patch were 8.34, 10.16, 11.86, 19.84, 54.73, 70.89, 82.25, and 83.02% for electrical potentials of 0, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 V, respectively. The release and permeation amount of Sul increased with the increasing electrical potential because of the electrorepulsive force, expanded pathway in pigskin, and pore formation in DPNR. Pore formation occurred under an applied electric field, as confirmed by optical micrographs. The porosity percentage increased with the increasing time and electrical potential due to the drug release and permeation and lack of plasticizer. The effect of storage time on the permeation characteristics was studied for 3 months. The release and permeation amount of Sul was 8.61 and 6.80 wt% for storage times of 1 and 3 months, respectively. Thus, the fabricated Sul-loaded DPNR patch is an electrically controllable TDD patch.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Deproteinized natural rubber Transdermal drug delivery Plasticizer Sulindac Iontophoresis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Conductive and Electroactive Polymer Research Unit of Chulalongkorn University, the Advance Materials Research Group, RMUTT, the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) and the Royal Thai Government.

References

  1. 1.
    Bhowmik D, Bhattacharjee C, Chandira M, Jayakar B, Sampath KP (2010) Recent advances in transdermal drug delivery system. Int J PharmTech Res 2(1):68–77Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xie Y, Xu BH, Gao Y (2005) Controlled transdermal delivery of model drug cpmpound by MEMS microneedle array. Nanomed J 1:184–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prausnitz MR, Langer R (2008) Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol 26(11):1261–1268CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bose S, Ravis WR, Lin YJ, Zhang L, Hofmann GA, Banga AK (2001) Electrically-assisted transdermal delivery of buprenorphine. J Control Release 73:197–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pikal MJ (2001) The role of electroosmotic flow in transdermal iontophoresis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 46:281–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta P, Vermani K, Garg S (2002) Hydrogel: from controlled release to pH-responsive drug delivery. Drug Discov Today 7(10):569–579CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thorngkham P, Paradee N, Niamlang S, Sirivat A (2015) Permeation study of indomethacin from polycarbazole/natural rubber blend film for electric field controlled transdermal delivery. J Pharm Sci 104:1795–1803CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Snorradottir BS, Gudnason PI, Thorsteinsson F, Masson M (2011) Experimental design for optimizing drug release from silicone elastomer matrix and investigation of transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci 42:559–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rippel MM, Leite CAP, Lee LT, Galembeck F (2005) Formation of calcium crystallites in dry natural rubber particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 288:449–456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suksaeree J, Boonme P, Taweepreda W, Ritthidej GC, Pichayakorn W (2012) Characterization in vitro release and permeation studies of nicotine transdermal patches prepared from deproteinized natural rubber latex blends. Chem Eng Res Des 90:906–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Floriano JF, Barros NR, Cinman JLF, Silva RG, Loffredo AV, Borges FA, Norberto AMQ, Chagas ALD, Garms BC, Graeff CFO, Herculano RD (2017) Ketoprofen loaded in natural rubber latex transdermal patch for tendinitis treatment. J Polym Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-1127-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Afreen S, Haque KR, Huda MK (2013) Troubleshooting for the observed problems in processing latex concentrate from natural resource. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 16:012007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perrella FW, Gaspari AA (2002) Natural rubber latex protein reduction with an emphasis on enzyme treatment. Methods 27:77–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paradee N, Sirivat A (2014) Electrically controlled release of benzoic acid from poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/alginate matrix: effect of conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene. Morphol J Phys Chem 118:9263 – 9271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas NA (1983) Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm 15(1):25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Higuchi T (1963) Mechanism of sustained-action medication: theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drug dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci 2:1145–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ozdemir KG, Yilmaz H, Yilmaz S (2009) In vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of soft liming materials on L929 Cells by MTT assay. J Biomed Mater Res B 90:82–86.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bouillaguet S, Shaw L, Gonzalez L, Wataha JC, Krejci I (2002) Long-term cytotoxicity of resin-based dental restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 29:7–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sussman GL, Beezhold DH, Kurup VP (2002) Allergens and natural rubber proteins. J Allergy Clin Immunol 110:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nawamawat K, Sakdapipanich JT, Ho CC (2010) Effect of deproteinized methods on the proteins and properties of natural rubber latex during storage. Macromol Symp 288:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aprem AS, Pal SN (2002) Latex allergy and recent development in deproteinsation of natural rubber latex. J Rubber Res 5(2):94–134Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee JH, Lee EJ, Kwon JS, Hwang CJ, Kim KN (2014) Cytotoxicity comparison of the nanoparticles deposited on latex rubber between the original and stertched state. J Nanomater.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/567827 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Herculano RD, Guimaraes SAC, Belmonte GC, Duarte MAH, Junior ONO, Kinoshita A, Graeff CFO (2010) Metronidazole release using natural rubber latex as matrix. Mater Res 13:57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shazly GA (2016) Effect of sulindac binary system on in vitro and vivo release profiles: an assessment of polymer type and its ratio. BioMed Res Int.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3182358 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cavallari C, Tarterini F, Fini A (2016) Thermal characterization of some polymer solvates of the anti-inflammatory/anti-cancer sulindac. Thermochim Acta 633:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Paradee N, Sirivat A, Niamlang S, Prissanaroom-Ouajai W (2012) Effect of crosslinking ratio model drug, and electric field strength on electrically controlled release for alginate-based hydrogel. Mater J Sci 23:999–1010Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sittiwong J, Niamlang S, Paradee N, Sirivat A (2012) Electric field-controlled benzoic acid and sulphanilamide delivery from poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel. J AAPS PharmSciTech 13:1407–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Juntanon K, Niamlang S, Rujiravanit R, Sirivat A (2008) Electrically controlled release of sulfosalicylic acid from crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel. Int J Pharm 356:1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weaver JC, Vaughan TE, Chizmadzhev Y (1999) Theory of electrical creation of aqueous pathways across skin transport barriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 35:21–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barros NR, Miranda MCR, Borges FA, Gemeinder JLP, Mendonça RJ, Cilli EM, Herculano RD (2017) Natural rubber latex: development and in vitro characterization of a future transdermal patch for enuresis treatment. Int J Polym Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2017.1280795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Material and Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringRajamangala University of Technology ThanyaburiThanyaburiThailand
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceKing Mongkut’s University of Technology ThonburiBangkokThailand
  3. 3.Conductive and Electroactive Polymers Research Unit, The Petroleum and Petrochemical CollegeChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations