Journal of Polymers and the Environment

, Volume 26, Issue 9, pp 3574–3589 | Cite as

Thermally Stable Pyrolytic Biocarbon as an Effective and Sustainable Reinforcing Filler for Polyamide Bio-composites Fabrication

  • Emmanuel O. Ogunsona
  • Amandine Codou
  • Manjusri MisraEmail author
  • Amar K. Mohanty
Original Paper


Natural fibers are limited in their use as reinforcement to commodity polymers. They cannot be used to reinforce engineering polymers due to their low thermal stability at high processing temperatures. This study presents an approach to successfully reinforce polyamides using a derivative of natural fibers as reinforcement without the effects of thermal degradation during melt processing. Biocarbon from miscanthus fibers was used to reinforce polyamide 6 up to 40 wt%. At 40 wt% filler content, the tensile and flexural strengths increased by 19.6 and 47% respectively in comparison to the neat polyamide. The moduli were also increased by 31.5 and 63.7% respectively. A maximum increase in impact strength of 43.7% was achieved at 20 wt% biocarbon loading. The morphology of the tensile fractured samples showed stretched polyamide ligaments attached to the biocarbon particles, indicating the presence of interaction between filler and matrix. Interestingly, more bonded interfaces were observed between the polyamide and biocarbon particles with increasing biocarbon content possibly stemming from increased biocarbon surfaces with functional groups. These composites show great potential to substitute in part or whole, some particulate filled polyamides currently used in the automotive industry.


Polyamide Biocarbon Polymer composites Reinforcements Bio-composites 



The authors acknowledge the financial support by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) – University of Guelph Product Development and Enhancement through Value Chains Research Theme (Project # 200399, 200388, 200245), The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Canada Discovery grant (Project # 400322) and Ontario Research Fund, Research Excellence Program; Round-7 (ORF-RE07) from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, currently known as the Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science (MRIS) (Project # 052644 and # 052665).


  1. 1.
    Stewart R (2010) Automotive composites offer lighter solutions. Reinf Plast 54:22–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2001) Surface modifications of natural fibers and performance of the resulting biocomposites: an overview. Compos Interfaces 8:313–343. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li X, Tabil LG, Panigrahi S (2007) Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. J Polym Environ 15:25–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bledzki A (1999) Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci 24:221–274. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ichazo M, Albano C, González J, Perera R, Candal M (2001) Polypropylene/wood flour composites: treatments and properties. Compos Struct 54:207–214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Štrumberger N, Gospočić A, Hvu M, Bartulić Č (2005) Polymeric materials in automobiles. Promet Traffic Traffico 17:149–160. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mohanty A, Tummala P, Misra M, Drzal L (2009) Filler reinforced thermoplastic compositions and process for manufacture. US Pat 7:582,241 2Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elsabbagh A, Steuernagel L, Ring J (2017) Natural Fibre/PA6 composites with flame retardance properties: extrusion and characterisation. Compos B Eng 108:325–333. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garcia-Ramirez M, Cavaillé JY, Dupeyre D, Péguy A (1994) Cellulose-polyamide 66 blends. I. Processing and characterization. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 32:1437–1448. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vold JL, Ulven CA, Chisholm BJ (2014) Torrefied biomass filled polyamide biocomposites: mechanical and physical property analysis. J Mater Sci 50:725–732. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collard FX, Blin, J (2014) A review on pyrolysis of biomass constituents: mechanisms and composition of the products obtained from the conversion of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38:594–608. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kan T, Strezov V, Evans TJ (2016) Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: a review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57:126–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lehmann J, Joseph S; Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation, Chapt. 4, Biochar production technology, Boateng AA, Garcia-Perez M, Masek O, Brown R, del Campo B pp 63–88, 2nd edn., Earthscan from RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Behazin E, Ogunsona E, Rodriguez-Uribe A, Mohanty AK, Misra M, Anyia AO (2016) Mechanical, chemical, and physical properties of wood and perennial grass biochars for possible composite application. BioResources 11:1334–1348. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Behazin E, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2017) Sustainable biocarbon from pyrolyzed perennial grasses and their effects on impact modified polypropylene biocomposites. Compos B Eng 118:116–124. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Salak F, Uemura S, Sugimoto K (2015) Thermal pretreatment of kudzu biomass (pueraria lobata) as filler in cost-effective pla biocomposite fabrication process. Polym Eng Sci 55:340–348. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Qian S, Sheng K, Yao W, Yu H (2016) Poly(lactic acid) biocomposites reinforced with ultrafine bamboo-char: Morphology, mechanical, thermal, and water absorption properties. J Appl Polym Sci. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peterson SC, Chandrasekaran SR, Sharma BK (2016) Birchwood biochar as partial carbon black replacement in styrene-butadiene rubber composites. J Elastomers Plast 48:305–316. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jong L, Peterson SC, Jackson MA (2014) Utilization of porous carbons derived from coconut shell and wood in natural rubber. J Polym Environ 22:289–297. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peterson SC (2011) Evaluating corn starch and corn stover biochar as renewable filler in carboxylated styrene-butadiene rubber composites. J Elastomers Plast 44:43–54. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peterson S (2013) Utilization of low-ash biochar to partially replace carbon black in styrene–butadiene rubber composites. J Elastomers Plast 45:487–497. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Das O, Sarmah AK, Bhattacharyya D (2016) Biocomposites from waste derived biochars: mechanical, thermal, chemical, and morphological properties. Waste Manag 49:560–570. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ahmetli G, Kocaman S, Ozaytekin I, Bozkurt P (2013) Epoxy composites based on inexpensive char filler obtained from plastic waste and natural resources. Polym Compos 34:500–509. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Richard S, Rajadurai JS, Manikandan V (2016) Influence of particle size and particle loading on mechanical and dielectric properties of biochar particulate-reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 21:462–477. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sri Aprilia N, Khalil H, Bhat A, Dungani R, Hossain M (2014) Exploring material properties of vinyl ester biocomposites filled carbonized jatropha seed shell. BioResources 9:4888–4898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ojha S, Acharya SK, Raghavendra G (2015) Mechanical properties of natural carbon black reinforced polymer composites. J Appl Polym Sci. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ogunsona EO, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2017) Impact of interfacial adhesion on the microstructure and property variations of biocarbons reinforced nylon 6 biocomposites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 98:32–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ogunsona EO, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2017) Sustainable biocomposites from biobased polyamide 6,10 and biocarbon from pyrolyzed miscanthus fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 134:44221. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ogunsona EO, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2017) Accelerated hydrothermal aging of biocarbon reinforced nylon biocomposites. Polym Degrad Stab 139:76–88. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ogunsona EO, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2017) Influence of epoxidized natural rubber on the phase structure and toughening behavior of biocarbon reinforced nylon 6 biocomposites. RSC Adv 7:8727–8739. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chrissafis K, Bikiaris D (2011) Can nanoparticles really enhance thermal stability of polymers? Part I: an overview on thermal decomposition of addition polymers. Thermochim Acta 523:1–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xenopoulos A, Wunderlich B (1990) Heat capacities of solid polyamides. Polymer 31:1260–1268. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Achhammer BG, Reinhart FW, Kline GM (1951) Mechanism of the degradation of polyamides. J Res Natl Bur Stand 46:391. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dabrowski F, Bourbigot S, Delobel R, Le Bras M (2000) Kinetic modelling of the thermal degradation of polyamide-6 nanocomposite. Eur Polym J 36:273–284. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Amintowlieh Y, Sardashti A, Simon LC (2012) Polyamide 6-wheat straw composites: degradation kinetics. Polym Compos 33:985–989. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lahijani P, Zainal ZA, Mohamed AR, Mohammadi M (2013) CO2 gasification reactivity of biomass char: catalytic influence of alkali, alkaline earth and transition metal salts. Bioresour Technol 144:288–295. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mani S, Kastner JR, Juneja A (2013) Catalytic decomposition of toluene using a biomass derived catalyst. Fuel Process Technol 114:118–125. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang ZZ, Zhu MM, Liu PF, Wan WC, Zhou WX, Chan YL, Zhang DK (2015) Effect of biochar on the cracking of tar from the pyrolysis of a pine sawdust in a fixed bed reactor. Energy Procedia 75:196–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dabrowski F, Bourbigot S, Delobel R, Le Bras M (2000) Kinetic modelling of the thermal degradation. Eur Polym J 36:273–284. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ogunsona EO, Anstey J, Torres SE, Codou AMFM-S., Jubinville DF (2018) Biocarbon and nylon based hybrid carbonaceous biocomposites and methods of making those and using thereof. US Application Patent: US20180022921A1Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nuñez A, Sturm P, Kenny J, Aranguren M, Marcovich N, Reboredo M (2003) Mechanical characterization of polypropylene–wood flour composites. J Appl Polym Sci 88:1420–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ahmed S, Jones F (1990) A review of particulate reinforcement theories for polymer composites. J Mater Sci 25:4933–4942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liu Z (2002) Effects of coupling agent and morphology on the impact strength of high density polyethylene/CaCO3 composites. Polymer 43:2501–2506. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Huber T, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2014) The effect of particle size on the rheological properties of polyamide 6/biochar composites. In AIP Conference Proceedings; Cleveland, Ohio, USA p. 150004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuel O. Ogunsona
    • 1
    • 2
  • Amandine Codou
    • 2
  • Manjusri Misra
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Amar K. Mohanty
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  2. 2.Bioproducts Discovery and Development Center, Department of Plant AgricultureUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations