Journal of Network and Systems Management

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 39–65 | Cite as

Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation for Video Traffic Using FARIMA-Based Forecasting Models

  • Christos KatrisEmail author
  • Sophia Daskalaki


In this work time series forecasting models and techniques are implemented to video traffic as part of three dynamic bandwidth allocation schemes. Traffic produced by videos is known to exhibit characteristics such as long and short range dependencies but as it is shown here non-linearity and conditional volatility may also appear as potential characteristics and then affect the choice of forecasting techniques. While models such as FARIMA, ARIMA and Holt-Winters have been used as traffic predictors in bandwidth allocation schemes, we attempt to improve the accuracy of video traffic predictions by using FARIMA/GARCH, hybrid FARIMA or FARIMA/GARCH with neural networks, a model selection strategy based on a non-linearity test, and a forecasting strategy which combines the forecasts produced by a FARIMA, a FARIMA/GARCH and a neural network. The traffic forecasts are used to allocate bandwidth following three different dynamic schemes. The performance of the different forecasting approaches is then tested on eight traces, aggregated on different timescales (frames, GoPs or seconds); and their comparison pertains their predictive capacity but mainly their cost effectiveness when contributing to dynamic bandwidth allocation approaches. Lastly, using the best forecasting approach, which on the average appears to be the hybrid FARIMA/GARCH-MLP model it is possible to evaluate the allocation schemes based on buffering and utilization rate, average and maximum queue length and total number of changes of allocated bandwidth.


Internet traffic forecasting FARIMA/GARCH Neural networks Hybrid forecasting models 


  1. 1.
    Beran, J., Sherman, R., Taqqu, M.S., Willinger, W.: Long-range dependence in variable-bit-rate video traffic. IEEE Trans. Commun. 43(234), 1566–1579 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Won, Y., Ahn, S.: GOP ARIMA: modeling the nonstationarity of VBR processes. Multimedia Syst. 10(5), 359–378 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Granger, C., Joyeux, R.: An introduction to long-memory time series models and fractional differencing. J. Time Ser. Anal. 1, 15–29 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hosking, J.R.: Fractional differencing. Biometrika 68(1), 165–176 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jin, Z., Shu, Y., Liu, J., Oliver, W.: Prediction-based bandwidth allocation for VBR traffic. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 2(4), 221–225 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geweke, J., Porter-Hudak, S.: The estimation and application of long memory time series models. J. Time Ser. Anal. 4, 221–238 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou, B., He, D., Sun, Z., Ng, W. H.: Network traffic modeling and prediction with ARIMA/GARCH. In: Proceedings of HET-NETs Conference, pp. 1–10 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Markovich, N.M., Krieger, U.R.: Statistical analysis and modeling of Skype VoIP flows. Comput. Commun. 33, S11–S21 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Balkin, S.D., Ord, J.K.: Automatic neural network modeling for univariate time series. Int. J. Forecast. 16(4), 509–515 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frank, R.J., Davey, N., Hunt, S.P.: Time series prediction and neural networks. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 31(1–3), 91–103 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cortez, P., Rio, M., Rocha, M., Sousa, P.: Multi-scale internet traffic forecasting using neural networks and time series methods. Expert Syst. 29(2), 143–155 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krithikaivasan, B., Zeng, Y., Deka, K., Medhi, D.: ARCH-based traffic forecasting and dynamic bandwidth provisioning for periodically measured nonstationary traffic. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw (TON) 15(3), 683–696 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sadek, N., Khotanzad, A., Chen, T.: ATM dynamic bandwidth allocation using F-ARIMA prediction model. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN 2003), pp. 359–363. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chowdhury, M.Z., Yeong, M.J.: Quality-aware popularity based bandwidth allocation for scalable video broadcast over wireless access networks. J. Intern. Technol. 16(6), 1089–1098 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crovella, M., Krishnamurthy, B.: Internet Measurement: Infrastructure, Traffic and Applications. Wiley, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, T.H., White, H., Granger, C.W.: Testing for neglected nonlinearity in time series models: a comparison of neural network methods and alternative tests. J. Econom. 56(3), 269–290 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Katris, C., Daskalaki, S.: Combining time series forecasting methods for internet traffic. In Stochastic Models, Statistics and their Applications, pp. 309–317. Springer International Publishing (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sowell, F.: Maximum likelihood estimation of stationary univariate fractionally integrated time series models. J. Econom. 53(1), 165–188 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghalanos, A.: rugarch: Univariate GARCH models. R package version, pp. 1–3 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baillie, R.T., Chung, C.F., Tieslau, M.A.: Analysing inflation by the fractionally integrated ARFIMA–GARCH model. J. Appl. Econom. 11(1), 23–40 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim, S.: Forecasting internet traffic by using seasonal GARCH models. J. Commun. Netw. 13(6), 621–624 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Syed, A.R., Saleem, H., Syed, H.: MCMC simulation of GARCH model to forecast network traffic load. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues 9(3/2), 277–284 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Engle, R.F., Bollerslev, T.: Modelling the persistence of conditional variances. Econom. Rev. 5(1), 1–50 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang, G., Patuwo, B.E., Hu, M.Y.: Forecasting with artificial neural networks: the state of the art. Int. J. Forecast. 14(1), 35–62 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cortez, P., Rio, M., Rocha, M., Sousa, P.: Internet traffic forecasting using neural networks. In: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN’06), pp. 2635–2642. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Haykin, S.: Neural Networks, a Comprehensive Foundation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abarbanel, H.D., Kennel, M.B.: Local false nearest neighbors and dynamical dimensions from observed chaotic data. Phys. Rev. E 47(5), 3057 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kantz, H., Schreiber, T.: Nonlinear Time Series Analysis, vol. 7. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Katris, C., Daskalaki, S.: Comparing forecasting approaches for internet traffic. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(21), 8172–8183 (2015)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fitzek, F.H.P., Reisslein, M.: MPEG-4 and H.263 video traces for network performance evaluation. IEEE Netw. 15(6), 40–54 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Seeling, P., Reisslein, M., Kulapala, B.: Network performance evaluation using frame size and quality traces of single-layer and two-layer video: a tutorial. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 6(3), 58–78 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Van der Auwera, G., David, P.T., Reisslein, M.: Traffic and quality characterization of single-layer video streams encoded with the H. 264/MPEG-4 advanced video coding standard and scalable video coding extension. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 54(3), 698–718 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of PatrasRioGreece

Personalised recommendations