Advertisement

Design and In Situ Validation of a Guided Wave System for Corrosion Monitoring in Coated Buried Steel Pipes

  • Ricardo C. JacquesEmail author
  • Henrique H. de Oliveira
  • Rafael W. F. dos Santos
  • Thomas G. R. Clarke
Article

Abstract

Ultrasonic guided waves allow long-range screening of the full cross-section of pipelines and are thus ideal for corrosion detection. Systems using removable arrays of sensors for one-off inspections are nowadays widely-available. Guided wave pipeline monitoring, on the other hand, consists of using cheap, robust and usually permanently-mounted sensors to compare the present state of the structure with a previous or undamaged condition. Current application of available monitoring systems shows that robustness and defect detection capability remain a challenge, and some major oil and gas companies therefore consider monitoring to be less well-established. This paper deals with the design and testing of a system designed for monitoring buried and coated pipelines, focusing especially on the development of an array (or collar) of sensors. It starts by showing in detail the characterization of single piezoelectric transducers. Finite element modelling was then used to establish the dimensions of an array of these transducers, and to describe its wave-field generation characteristics. These results were then validated experimentally, initially in laboratory conditions; subsequently, a prototype was built and blind tested in near-operational conditions, which consisted of a buried full-scale pipe segment coated with Stopaq and polyethylene. The pipe segment was subjected to electrolytically accelerated corrosion at uncertain locations and at a rate which was unknown to the authors at LAMEF–UFRGS who were involved in data analysis. Results show that after 2 years of periodic data gathering, the collar showed good stability and robustness, and that it was able to detect corrosion defects found in the dissection of the pipe.

Keywords

Guided waves Coated pipe Piezoelectric transducers Nondestructive testing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Giovanno Zuglian, Alberto Bisognin and Lúcio Correa for helping us manufacture the system and Júlio E Ramos and the team at CTDUT for the help with the field test.

References

  1. 1.
    Kishawy, H.A., Gabbar, H.A.: Review of pipeline integrity management practices. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 87, 373–380 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2010.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boivin, G., Viens, M., Belanger, P.: Development of a low frequency shear horizontal piezoelectric transducer for the generation of plane SH waves. AIP Conf. Proc. 1706, 030019 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4940491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vinogradov, S., Barrera, C.: Development of guided wave examinations of piping and tubing using magnetostrictive sensor technology. In: 8th International Conference on NDE in Relation to Structural Integrity for Nuclear and Pressurized Components. https://www.ndt.net/article/jrc-nde2010/papers/25.pdf (2010)
  4. 4.
    Mirkhani, K., et al.: Optimal design of EMAT transmitters. NDT&E Int. 37, 181–193 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2003.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ribichini, R., Cegla, F., Nagy, P.B., Cawley, P.: Experimental and numerical evaluation of electromagnetic acoustic transducer performance on steel materials. NDT&E Int. 45, 32–38 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilcox, P.D., Lowe, M.J.S., Cawley, P.: Mode and transducer selection for long range lamb wave inspection. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 12, 553–565 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1106/N9PB-Y62E-P0Y2-50QF CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yibo, L., Liying, S., Zhidong, S., Yuankai, Z.: Study on energy attenuation of ultrasonic guided waves going through girth welds. Ultrasonics 44(2006), e1111–e1116 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cawley, P., Cegla, F., Galvagni, A.: Guided waves for NDT and permanently installed monitoring. In: 18th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing. https://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt2012/papers/590_wcndtfinal00589.pdf (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leinov, E., Lowe, M.J.S., Cawley, P.: Ultrasonic isolation of buried pipes. J. Sound Vib. 363, 225–239 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Velsor, J.K., Rose, J.L., Nestleroth, J.B.: Detection of protective coating disbonds in pipe using circumferential guided waves. In: 17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheng, J.-W., Yang, S.-K., Lee, P.-H., Juang, C.-J.: Attenuation of Guided Wave Propagation by the Insulation Pipe. In: Petrochemicals, Chap. 7, pp. 137–151. (2012).  https://doi.org/10.5772/37379 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cobb, A.C., Kwun, H., Caseres, L., Janega, G.: Torsional guided wave attenuation in piping from coating, temperature, and large-area corrosion. NDT&E Int. 47, 163–170 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kwun, H., Kim, S.Y., Choi, M.S., Walker, S.M.: Torsional guided-wave attenuation in coal-tar-enamel-coated, buried piping. NDT&E Int. 37, 663–665 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2004.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bertoncini, F., De Lorenzo, G., Giunta, G., Raugi, M., Turcu, F.: Effect of Attenuation on Inspection Range and Sensitivity in Long-Range Guided Wave NDT of Coated and Buried Pipes. NDT.net Journal. www.ndt.net/?id=9985 (2010). Accessed 1 Feb 2019
  15. 15.
    Pei, K.-C., Shyu, H.-F., Lee, P.-H., Toung, J.-C.: Development and application of guided wave technology for buried piping inspection in nuclear power plant. In: 2015 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ultsym.2015.0080
  16. 16.
    Volker, A., Vos, H.: Experimental results of guided wave travel time tomography. In: 18th World Conference on Non destructive Testing. https://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt2012/papers/128_wcndtfinal00128.pdf (2012)
  17. 17.
    Seher, M., Huthwaite, P., Lowe, M.J.S.: Experimental studies of the inspection of areas with restricted access using A0 lamb wave tomography. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 63(9), 1455–1467 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2583410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilcox, P.D.: Guided-wave array methods. In: Boller, C., Chang, F.K. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring. Wiley, Sheffield, vol. 1, chap. 16, pp. 1–19 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davies, J., Cawley, P.: The application of synthetic focusing for imaging crack-like defects in pipelines using guided waves. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 56(4), 759–771 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFc.2009.1098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Demma, A., Cawley, P., Lowe, M., Roosenbrand, A.G., Pavlakovic, B.: The reflection of guided waves from notches in pipes: a guide for interpreting corrosion measurements. NDT&E Int. 37, 167–180 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2003.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lowe, M.J.S., Alleyne, D.N., Cawley, P.: Defect detection in pipes using guided waves. Ultrasonics 36, 147–154 (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-624X(97)00038-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leinov, E., Lowe, M.J.S., Cawley, P.: Investigation of guided wave propagation and attenuation in pipe buried in sand. J. Sound Vib. 347, 96–114 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.02.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo C. Jacques
    • 1
    Email author
  • Henrique H. de Oliveira
    • 1
  • Rafael W. F. dos Santos
    • 2
  • Thomas G. R. Clarke
    • 1
  1. 1.PPG3M/UFRGSPorto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Cenpes/PetrobrasRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations