Advertisement

Phased Array Ultrasonic Inspection of Metal Additive Manufacturing Parts

  • Ana Beatriz LopezEmail author
  • João Santos
  • José Pedro Sousa
  • Telmo G. Santos
  • Luísa Quintino
Article

Abstract

The adoption of wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) in the market has been retained by the need to find a suitable method to ensure the quality of the parts produced. WAAM processes build up parts through the deposition of weld beads, consequently components with rough finish surfaces are characteristics of the method. Non-destructive testing (NDT) by ultrasonic (UT) method, namely the phased array technique (PAUT), is usually used to detect these defects in welding. However, the roughness of the parts represents a challenge for the UT application, since these variations influence the interaction between the emitted UT beam and the component. This study is thus focused on assessing the capability of detecting WAAM defects. The effectiveness of phased array ultrasonic testing to detect defects in aluminium WAAM components with several degrees of surface finish was evaluated. Simulations were first performed with CIVA software to characterize the beam emitted and select the probes and inspection parameters. Afterwards, physical inspections were performed on three reference specimens. Experimental outcomes prove that PAUT techniques are suitable for WAAM defects detection, including sizing, morphology and location. In addition, the experimental results were consistent with the simulated ones. The probes were able to overcome the limitations caused by the surface roughness of the samples, for a maximum of 89.6 μm average waviness profile. Also, defects ranging from 2 to 5 mm were characterized, in size and depth. These preliminary results represent an essential step for the development of an NDT system for inspecting WAAM parts.

Keywords

Arc-based additive manufacturing Non-destructive testing Ultrasonic testing Rough surfaces 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research financed by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT-MCTES) under the PhD Research Grant PD/BD/114153/2016. This work was supported by FCT-MCTES, through IDMEC, under LAETA, Project UID/EMS/50022/2013 TGS knowledge FCT-MCTES for its financial support via the Project UID/EMS/00667/2019. The authors would also like to acknowledge the opportunity of manufacture the samples at Cranfield University.

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 723600 - LASIMM Project.

References

  1. 1.
    Pan, Z., et al.: Arc welding processes for additive manufacturing: a review. Transactions on Intelligent Welding Manufacturing, pp. 3–24. Springer, Singapore (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cunningham, C.R., et al.: Invited review article: strategies and processes for high quality wire arc additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 22, 672–686 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, C., et al.: Wire arc additive manufacturing of Al-6Mg alloy using variable polarity cold metal transfer arc as power source. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 711, 415–423 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martina, F., et al.: Investigation of the benefits of plasma deposition for the additive layer manufacture of Ti–6Al–4V. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 212(6), 1377–1386 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Queguineur, A., et al.: Evaluation of wire arc additive manufacturing for large-sized components in naval applications. Weld. World 62(2), 259–266 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, Y., et al.: Enhanced beads overlapping model for wire and arc additive manufacturing of multi-layer multi-bead metallic parts. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 252, 838–848 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, F., et al.: Adaptive process control of wire and arc additive manufacturing for fabricating complex-shaped components. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 96(1-4), 871–879 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sridharan, N., et al.: On the toughness scatter in low alloy C-Mn steel samples fabricated using wire arc additive manufacturing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 713, 18–27 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, F., et al.: Thermoelectric cooling-aided bead geometry regulation in wire and arc-based additive manufacturing of thin-walled structures. Appl. Sci. 8(2), 207 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ding, D., et al.: A practical path planning methodology for wire and arc additive manufacturing of thin-walled structures. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 34, 8–19 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Everton, S.K., et al.: Review of in situ process monitoring and in situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing. Mater. Des. 95, 431–445 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cerniglia, D., Montinaro, N.: Defect detection in additively manufactured components: laser ultrasound and laser thermography comparison. Proc. Struct. Integr. 8, 154–162 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chua, Z.Y., Ahn, H., Moon, S.K.: Process monitoring and inspection systems in metal additive manufacturing: status and applications. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. 4(2), 235–245 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Waller, J.M., et al.: Nondestructive Evaluation of Additive Manufacturing State-of-the-Discipline Report. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Las Cruces (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu, B., et al.: A review of the wire arc additive manufacturing of metals: properties, defects and quality improvement. J. Manuf. Process. 35, 127–139 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ding, D., et al.: Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components: technologies, developments and future interests. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 81(1–4), 465–481 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Lopez, A., et al.: Non-destructive testing application of radiography and ultrasound for wire and arc additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 21, 298–306 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Knezović, N., Dolšak, B.: In-process non-destructive ultrasonic testing application during wire plus arc additive manufacturing. Adv. Prod. Eng. Manag. 13(2), 158–168 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thompson, A., Maskery, I., Leach, R.K.: X-ray computed tomography for additive manufacturing: a review. Meas. Sci. Technol. 27(7), 072001 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Drinkwater, B.W., Wilcox, P.D.: Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: a review. NDT E Int. 39(7), 525–541 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Taheri, H., et al.: Fast ultrasonic imaging with total focusing method (TFM) for inspection of additively manufactured polymer composite component. In: 27th ASNT Research Symposium, March 2019, pp. 212–220, 2018Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Raišutis, R., et al.: Application of ultrasonic guided waves for non-destructive testing of large and complex geometry engineering structures. Vibroeng. Proc. 14, 87–90 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Holmes, C., Drinkwater, B.W., Wilcox, P.D.: Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit–receive array data for non-destructive evaluation. NDT E Int. 38(8), 701–711 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leleux, A., Micheau, P., Castaings, M.: Long range detection of defects in composite plates using lamb waves generated and detected by ultrasonic phased array probes. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 32(2), 200–214 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Pamel, A., et al.: Numerical simulations of ultrasonic array imaging of highly scattering materials. NDT E Int. 81, 9–19 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Palanisamy, S., Nagarajah, C.R., Iovenitti, P.: Ultrasonic inspection of rough surface aluminium die castings. Insight Nondest. Test. Cond. Monit. 49(3), 160–164 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Benstock, D., Cegla, F., Stone, M.: The influence of surface roughness on ultrasonic thickness measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 136(6), 3028–3039 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rodriquez, E., Fraudita, F., Amorer, L.: Effect of surface roughness in ultrasonic testing (pulse-echo by direct contact) in AISI/SAE 4340 steel samples. J. Nondestruct. Test. 8(12), 1–8 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Nondestructive Testing LaboratoryInstituto de Soldadura e Qualidade (ISQ)OeirasPortugal
  3. 3.UNIDEMI, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, NOVA School of Science and TechnologyNOVA University LisbonCaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations