Advertisement

Mutual Impedance of Eddy-Current Coils Above a Second-Layer Crack of Finite Length

  • Matthew E. IbrahimEmail author
  • Stephen K. Burke
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

A model is presented to determine the change in mutual impedance between a driver and pickup coil due to eddy-current interaction with a crack in a conductive two-layer plate system where the plates are separated by a non-conducting layer of constant thickness. Here, the impedance change of interest arises from a through-thickness crack of finite length located in the hidden lower plate. The model assumes that both conducting plates are electromagnetically thin and is therefore valid for large electromagnetic skin-depth. The model predictions are compared with experimental measurements using a pair of cylindrical air-cored coils arranged to simulate an eddy-current sliding probe. Agreement between the calculated and measured impedance change is obtained over the frequency range 10 Hz–3 kHz for which the plates can be treated as electromagnetically thin, and reasonable qualitative agreement was obtained at higher frequencies. A method for computing the induced current streamlines in the presence of the crack is also described and visualisation of the computed streamlines is used to assist in the interpretation of the impedance change for different probe orientations. These results provide a valuable initial insight into the interaction between a buried crack in a multilayer structure and the electromagnetic fields induced and detected by eddy-current sliding probes.

Keywords

Eddy-current testing Driver-pickup coils Mutual impedance Crack modelling Nondestructive testing 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Gunn, R.: An eddy-current method of flaw detection in non-magnetic metals. J. Appl. Mech. 8, A22–A26 (1941)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rao, B.P.C.: Aerospace material technologies, vol. 2. Springer Nature, Singapore (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Larson B, Madison E, Nakagawa N Laboratory POD data acquisition from inner layer cracks in simulated airframe structures. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, 2009. Vol 1. AIP, pp. 1840-1847Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cecco, V.S., Carter, J.R., Sullivan, S.P.: An eddy-current technique for detecting and sizing surface cracks in carbon steel. Mater. Eval. 51(5), 572–577 (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burke, S.K., Rose, L.R.F.: Interaction of induced currents with cracks in thin plates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 418, 229–246 (1988).  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1988.0081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burke, S.K.: Eddy-current Inspection of cracks in a multilayer conductor. J. Appl. Phys. 67(1), 465–476 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.345227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Theodoulidis, T.P., Panas, S.M., Kriezis, E.E.: Eddy current detection of crack orientation using elliptical excitation. IEE Proc. A 141(1), 41–47 (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-smt:19949582 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ibrahim, M.E., Burke, S.K.: Catching up with the sliding probe: quantitative models for eddy-current driver-pickup coils. Non-Destr. Test. Aust. 43(1), 9–15 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Auld, B.A.: Theoretical characterization and comparison of resonant-probe microwave eddy-current testing with conventional low-frequency eddy-current methods. In: Burnbaum, G., Free, G. (eds.) Eddy-current characterization of materials and structures, pp. 332–347. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia (1981).  https://doi.org/10.1520/stp27596s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gradshteyn, I.S., Ryzhik, I.M.: Tables of integrals, series, and products, 4th edn, p. 979. Academic Press, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Erdogan, F., Gupta, G.D.: On the numerical solution of singular integral equations. Q. Appl. Math. 29(4), 525–534 (1972).  https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/408277 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A.: Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, vol. 55. Courier Corporation, New York (1965)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burke, S.K., Ibrahim, M.E.: Mutual impedance of air-cored coils above a conducting plate. J. Phys. D 37(13), 1857–1868 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/37/13/021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luloff, M.S., Desjardins, D., Morelli, J., Krause, T.W.: Solution for a transmit-receive eddy current probe above a layered planar conductive structure. NDT&E Int. 96, 1–8 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miorelli, R., Reboud, C., Theodoulidis, T.P., Poulakis, N., Lesselier, D.: Efficient modeling of ECT signals for realistic cracks in layered half-space. IEEE Trans. Magn. 49(6), 2886–2892 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maritime DivisionDefence Science and Technology GroupFishermans BendAustralia

Personalised recommendations