Advertisement

Characterization of Concrete Pile Groups with 2-D Seismic Waveform Tomography

  • Khiem T. TranEmail author
  • Farrokh (Frank) Jalinoos
  • Anil K. Agrawal
Article

Abstract

Currently, about 28,000 bridges over water in the United States are classified as having missing key foundation information such as number and distribution of piles and pile lengths. The as-built drawings of buried concrete piles or drilled shafts are critical in assessing the hydraulic scour vulnerability of bridges. This paper presents an application of seismic waveform tomography for characterization of shaft groups. The capability of an existing 2-D Gauss–Newton seismic waveform tomography method was investigated on challenging subsurface conditions for groups of drilled shafts with various lengths within each group. The method was applied to field experimental datasets collected at the National Geotechnical Experimental Site (NGES) at College Station, Texas. The site contains two groups of four and five drilled shafts with various lengths from 10.4 to 24.1 m. Seismic wave fields were measured on the ground surface at the edges of the two pile groups, and analyzed by the 2-D waveform tomography method. Seismic results showed that waveform analysis was able to well characterize the pile groups. Individual drilled shafts and soil between them are distinguished, and lengths were also generally predicted.

Keywords

Unknown foundation 2-D waveform tomography Pile group National geotechnical experimental site (NGES) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by Federal Highway Administration under contract number DTFH61-14-D-00010. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Highway Administration. The authors would like to thank Professors Briaud and Everett of the Texas A&M University for graduate field assistance and logistic support for the conduct of field work at the NGES test site.

References

  1. 1.
    Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): Office of Bridge and Structure (2017). https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/britab.cfm
  2. 2.
    Olson, L. D., Jalinoos, F., and Marwan, F. A.: Determination of Unknown Subsurface Bridge Foundations: Geotechnical Guideline No. 16, A Summary of NCHRP 21-5 Interim Report, Federal Highway Administration, Washington (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stein, S., Sedmera, K.: Risk-Based Management Guidelines for Scour at Bridges with Unknown Foundations. NCHRP Web-Only DOCUMENT 107, Final Report for NCHRP Project 24-25 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yousefpour, N., Medina-Cetina, Z., Briaud, J.L.: Evaluation of unknown foundations of bridges subjected to scour. J. Transp. Res. Board 2433, 27–38 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wightman W., Jalinoos F., Sirles P., and Hanna K.: Applications of geophysical methods to related highway problems: FHWA Technical Manual (2003). http://www.ce.memphis.edu/7137/PDFs/Geophysical/geotechPdf.pdf
  6. 6.
    Davis, A.G., Dunn, C.S.: From theory to field experience with the non-destructive vibration testing of piles. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Part 2, 571–593 (1975)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, A.G., Hertlein, B.H.: Development of nondestructive small strain methods for testing deep foundations: a review. Transp. Res. Rec. 1331, 15–20 (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paquet, J.: Etude Vibratoire des pieux en beton; response harmonique. Anna/es Inst. Technol. Batim. 21(245), 789–803 (1968)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koten, H. van and Middendorp, P.: Testing of Foundation Piles. HERON, Joint Publication of the Department of Civil Engineering of Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, and Institute TNO for Building Materials and Sciences, Rigswijk (ZH), The Netherlands, vol. 26, no. 4 (1981)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Douglas, R. A., and Holt J. D.: Determining Length of Installed Timber Pilings by Dispersive Wave Propagation Methods. Report: Center for Transportation Engineering Studies, North Carolina State University (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holt, J.D. and Douglas, R.A.: A Field Test Procedure for Finding the Overall Lengths of Installed Timber Piles by Dispersive Wave Propagation Methods. Technical Report No. NC/R&D/94-001, ITRE, University of North Carolina (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jalinoos, F., and Olson, L. D.: Determination of unknown depth of bridge foundations using nondestructive testing methods. Proc., Structural Materials Technology: NDT Conf., Technomic, Lancaster (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jalinoos, F., Olson, L. D., and Aouad, M. F.: Determination of unknown depth of bridge foundations using two nondestructive seismic methods. Proc., Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), Environment and Engineering Geophysical Society, Tulsa (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jalinoos, F., Olson, L. D., and Aouad, M. F.: Determination of unknown depth of bridge foundations using two nondestructive seismic methods, Proc., Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), Environment and Engineering Geophysical Society, Tulsa (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jalinoos F., Gibson A, Diehl, J., Hadfield P., and Gordon G.: Determination of Unknown Length of Sheet Piles Using Three Geophysical Logging Methods. Geophysics 2006 Conference, Saint Louis (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jalinoos, F., Tran, K.T., Nguyen, T.D., Agrawal, A.K.: Evaluation of bridge abutments and wall type structures with ultraseismic waveform tomography. J. Bridge Eng. 22(12), 04017104-1–04017104-13 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stain, R.T.: Integrity Testing, pp. 53–73. Civil Engineering, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sack, D. A., and Olson, L. D.: Combined Parallel Seismic and Cone Penetrometer Testing of Existing Foundation for Foundation Length and Evaluation. Proc., Int. Found (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hossain, M., Khan, M., Hossain, J., Kibria, G., Taufiq, T.: Evaluation of unknown foundation depth using different NDT methods. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27(2), 209–214 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coe, J.T., Kermani, B.: Comparison of borehole ultrasound and borehole radar in evaluating the length of two unknown bridge foundations. DFI J. 10(1), 8–24 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tucker, S., Briaud, J., Hurlebaus, S., Everett, M., Arjwech, R.: Electrical resistivity and induced polarization imaging for unknown bridge foundations. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 141(5), 04015008 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahvelati, S., Coe, J.: T: The Use of Two Dimensional (2D) Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) Testing to Evaluate the Geometry of an Unknown Bridge Foundation. Geotechnical Frontiers, Orlando (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Descour, J.M., and Kabir, J.J.: Imaging Piles in Bridge Foundations Using Tomography and Horizontal Seismic Reflector Tracing. Proc. Geo-Florida 2010, West Palm Beach (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nguyen, T.D., Tran, K.T., McVay, M.: Evaluation of unknown foundations using surface-based full waveform tomography. J. Bridge Eng. 21(5), 04016013 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vireux, J., Operto, S.: An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics 74(6), WCC1–WCC26 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kallivokas, L.F., Fathi, A., Kucukcoban, S., Stokoe, K.H., Bielak, J., Ghattas, O.: Site characterization using full waveform inversion. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 47, 62–82 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tran, K.T., McVay, M., Faraone, M., Horhota, D.: Sinkhole detection using 2-D full seismic waveform tomography. Geophysics 78(5), R175–R183 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Köhn, D., Meier, T., Fehr, M., De Nil, D., Auras, M.: Application of 2D elastic Rayleigh waveform inversion to ultrasonic laboratory and field data. Near Surf. Geophys. 14(5), 461–476 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tran, K.T., Luke, B.: Full waveform tomography to resolve desert alluvium. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 9, 1–8 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pratt, R.G., Shin, C., Hicks, G.J.: Gauss-Newton and full Newton methods in frequency-space seismic waveform inversion. Geophys. J. Int. 133, 341–362 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sheen, D.H., Tuncay, K., Baag, C.E., Ortoleva, P.J.: Time domain Gauss-Newton seismic waveform inversion in elastic media. Geophys. J. Int. 167, 1373–1384 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Briaud, J.L.: The National Geotechnical Experimentation Sites at Texas A&M University: A Summary, NGES-TAMU-007 (1997)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Briaud, J.L., M. Ballouz and G. Nasr: Defect and length predictions by NDT methods for nine bored piles. Proc. Intl. Deep Foundations Congress, Orlando (2002)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Briaud, J.L., Medina-Cetina, Z., Hurlebaus, S., Everett, M., Tucker, S., Yousefpour, N. and Arjwech, R.: Unknown Foundation Determination for Scour, FHWA/TX-12/0-6604-1 (2012)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arjwech, R.: Electrical Resistivity Imaging for Unknown Bridge Foundation Depth Determination, PhD Dissertation, Texas A&M University (2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Virieux, J.P.: SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity–stress finite-difference method. Geophysics 51(4), 889–901 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kamatitsch, D., Martin, R.: An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation. Geophysics 72(5), SM155–SM167 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tran, K.T., Hiltunen, D.R.: One-dimensional inversion of full waveform using genetic algorithm. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 17, 197–213 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tran, K.T., Hiltunen, D.R.: Two-dimensional inversion of full waveform using simulated annealing. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138(9), 1075–1090 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tran, K.T., and Hiltunen, D.R.: A Comparison of Shear Wave Velocity Profiles from SASW, MASW, and ReMi Techniques: Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, Geotechnical Special Publication 181 (2008)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ernst, J.R., Maurer, H., Green, A.G., Holliger, K.: Application of a new 2D time-domain full-waveform inversion scheme to crosshole radar data. Geophysics 72, J53–J64 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khiem T. Tran
    • 1
    Email author
  • Farrokh (Frank) Jalinoos
    • 2
  • Anil K. Agrawal
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Coastal EngineeringUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Federal Highway Administration, Office of Infrastructures R&DMcLeanUSA
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringCity College of the City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations