Advertisement

Patterns of Nonverbal Rapport Behaviors Across Time in Investigative Interviews with Children

  • Veronica Johnston
  • Sonja P. BrubacherEmail author
  • Martine Powell
  • Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz
Original Paper

Abstract

The present study evaluated whether the strength of relationship between child nonverbal behaviors (expressivity, attention, and coordination) across time points varied as a function of interviewer nonverbal behaviors (expressivity, attention, and coordination) under supportive versus neutral interviewing conditions. Children (n = 123) participated in an event where they were involved in breaking some rules. Three to four days later they were interviewed by either a supportive or neutral adult interviewer. Interviews were video recorded and nonverbal behaviors of both children and interviewers were coded. Multi-level modeling revealed that optimal interviewer nonverbal behaviors were predictive of optimal child nonverbal behaviors at the end of the interview. In contrast, explicitly manipulated interviewer supportiveness was related to suboptimal displays of child nonverbal behavior. Interestingly, as the interview progressed, optimally attentive interviewing was associated with suboptimal child expressivity scores. Likewise, displays of optimal interviewer coordination were associated with suboptimal child coordination scores over time. The implications of the findings for nonverbal behavior literature and professionals talking with children about sensitive information are discussed.

Keywords

Nonverbal behavior Rapport Support Optimal experience Interviewer Child 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted for the Doctoral dissertation of VAJ. The authors are grateful to the children and schools who participated, as well as to Evangeline Wai and Elizabeth Beyer for assistance with coding. The research was unfunded.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Almerigogna, J., Ost, J., Akehurst, L., & Fluck, M. (2008). How interviewers’ nonverbal behaviors can affect children’s perceptions and suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100(1), 17–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 201–271). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 256–274.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnlund, D. C. (1970). A transactional model of communication. In K. K. Sereno & C. D. Mortensen (Eds.), Foundations of communication theory (pp. 83–92). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  5. Bernieri, F. J. (1988). Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher–student interactions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12(2), 120–138.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernieri, F. (2005). The expression of rapport. In V. Manusov & V. Manusov (Eds.), The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words (pp. 347–359). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Bernieri, F., Gillis, J. S., Davis, J. M., & Grahe, J. E. (1996). Dyad rapport and the accuracy of its judgment across situations: A lens model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 110–129.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boone, R. T., & Buck, R. (2003). Emotional expressivity and trustworthiness: The role of nonverbal behavior in the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 163–182.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025341931128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bottoms, B. L., Quas, J. A., & Davis, S. L. (2007). The influence of the interviewer-provided social support on children’s suggestibility, memory, and disclosures. In M. E. Pipe, M. E. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A. C. Cederborg (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay, and denial (pp. 135–157). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wlhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Erickson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion, 3(1), 48–67.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carter, C. A., Bottoms, B. L., & Levine, M. (1996). Linguistic and socioemotional influences on the accuracy of children’s reports. Law and Human Behavior, 20(3), 335–358.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins, R., Lincoln, R., & Frank, M. G. (2002). The effect of rapport in forensic interviewing. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 9(1), 69.  https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.2002.9.1.69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 636–640.  https://doi.org/10.2307/258925.Google Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, S. L., & Bottoms, B. L. (2002). Effects of social support on children’s eyewitness reports: A test of the underlying mechanism. Law and Human Behavior, 26(2), 185–215.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014692009941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dickinson, J. J., Brubacher, S. P., & Poole, D. A. (2015). Children’s performance on ground rules questions: Implications for forensic interviewing. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 87–97.  https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dickinson, J., & Poole, D. (2017). The influence of disclosure history and body diagrams on children’s reports of inappropriate touching: Evidence from a new analog paradigm. Law and Human Behavior, 41(1), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: (and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Schwartz-Kenney, B. M., & Rudy, L. (1991). Children’s testimony about a stressful event: Improving children’s reports. Journal of Narrative & Life History, 1(1), 69–99.  https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.1.1.05chi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grahe, J. E., & Bernieri, F. J. (1999). The importance of nonverbal cues in judging rapport. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23(4), 253–269.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021698725361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grahe, J. E., & Bernieri, F. J. (2002). Self-awareness of judgment policies of rapport. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1407–1418.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702236872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hershkowitz, I. (2009). Socioemotional factors in child sexual abuse investigations. Child Maltreatment, 14(2), 172–181.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559508326224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., & Katz, C. (2014). Allegation rates in forensic child abuse investigations: Comparing the revised and standard NICHD protocols. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(3), 336–344.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Katz, C., & Malloy, L. C. (2015). Does enhanced rapport-building alter the dynamics of investigative interviews with suspected victims of intra-familial abuse? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(1), 6–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-013-9136-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Dynamics of forensic interviews with suspected abuse victims who do not disclose abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30(7), 753–769.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.10.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hughes, J. N., & Baker, D. B. (1991). The clinical child interview. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hughes-Scholes, C. H., & Powell, M. B. (2013). Techniques used by investigative interviewers to elicit disclosures of abuse from child witnesses: A critique. Police Practice & Research: An International Journal, 14(1), 45–52.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2012.680716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Imhoff, M. C., & Baker-Ward, L. (1999). Preschoolers’ suggestibility: Effects of developmentally appropriate language and interviewer supportiveness. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20(3), 407–429.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00022-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, E. E., Gergen, K. J., & Jones, R. G. (1963). Tactics of ingratiation among leaders and subordinates in a status hierarchy. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 77(3), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Katz, C. (2015). ‘Stand by me’: The effect of emotional support on children’s testimonies. British Journal of Social Work, 45(1), 349–362.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Katz, C., Hershkowitz, I., Malloy, L. C., Lamb, M. E., Atabaki, A., & Spindler, S. (2012). Nonverbal behavior of children who disclose or do not disclose child abuse in investigative interviews. Child Abuse and Neglect, 36(1), 12–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knudson, R. M., Sommers, A. A., & Golding, S. L. (1980). Interpersonal perception and mode of resolution in marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(5), 751–763.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.5.751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. La Rooy, D., Brubacher, S. P., Aromäki-Stratos, A., Cyr, M., Hershkowitz, I., Korkman, J., et al. (2015). The NICHD protocol: A review of an internationally-used evidence-based tool for training child forensic interviewers. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 1(2), 76–89.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-01-2015-0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. LaFrance, M., & Broadbent, M. (1976). Group rapport: Posture sharing as a nonverbal indicator. Group & Organization Studies, 1(3), 328–333.  https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117600100307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14(4), 334–339.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.14481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2008). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewy, J., Cyr, M., & Dion, J. (2015). Impact of interviewers’ supportive comments and children’s reluctance to cooperate during sexual abuse disclosure. Child Abuse and Neglect, 43, 112–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Malloy, L. C., Brubacher, S. P., & Lamb, M. E. (2011). Expected consequences of disclosure revealed in investigative interviews with suspected victims of child sexual abuse. Applied Developmental Science, 15(1), 8–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2011.538616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moore, C., & Dunham, P. J. (2014). Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp. 239–263). Netherlands, Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Nelson, A. A., Grahe, J. E., & Ramseyer, F. (2016). Interacting in flow: An analysis of rapport-based behavior as optimal experience. SAGE Open.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016684173.Google Scholar
  43. Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2000). Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(6), 733–752.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00137-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Patterson, M. L., & Stockbridge, E. (1998). Effects of cognitive demand and judgment strategy on person perception accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22(4), 253–263.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022996522793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 85–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Poole, D. A. (2016). Interviewing children: The science of conversation in forensic contexts. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.  https://doi.org/10.1037/14941-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Quas, J. A., Wallin, A. R., Papini, S., Lench, H., & Scullin, M. H. (2005). Suggestibility, social support, and memory for a novel experience in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91(4), 315–341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Riggio, R. (2002). Emotional expressiveness, extraversion, and neuroticism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 26(4), 195–218.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022117500440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roberts, K. P., Brubacher, S. P., Powell, M. B., & Price, H. L. (2011). Practice narratives. In M. E. Lamb, D. La Rooy, C. Katz, & L. C. Malloy (Eds.), Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (pp. 129–146). Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rotenberg, K., Eisenberg, N., Cumming, C., Smith, A., Singh, M., & Terlicher, E. (2003). The contribution of adults’ nonverbal cues and children’s shyness to the development of rapport between adults and preschool children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(1), 21–30.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250143000571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruddock, A. C. (2006). The relationship of interviewer rapport behaviors to the amount and type of disclosure from children during child abuse investigations. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, vol. 67, no. 4-B, p. 2241.Google Scholar
  52. Saywitz, K. J., Larson, R. P., Hobbs, S. D., & Wells, C. R. (2015). Developing rapport with children in forensic interviews: Systematic review of experimental research. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(4), 372–389.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tickle-Degnen, L. (2006). Nonverbal behavior and its functions in the ecosystem if rapport. In V. Manusov & M. Patterson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 381–401). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tickle-Degnen, L., & Gavett, E. (2003). Changes in nonverbal behavior during the development of therapeutic relationships. In P. Philippot, R. S. Feldman, & E. J. Coats (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior in clinical settings (pp. 75–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tickle-Degnen, L., & Puccinelli, N. M. (1999). The nonverbal expression of negative emotions: Peer and supervisor responses to occupational therapy students’ emotional attributes. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 19(1), 18–39.  https://doi.org/10.1177/153944929901900102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4), 285–293.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532796p5li0104_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vallano, J. P., & Compo, N. S. (2011). A comfortable witness is a good witness: Rapport-building and susceptibility to misinformation in an investigative mock-crime interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 960–970.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2012). Examining rapport in investigative interviews with suspects: Does its building and maintenance work? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27(1), 73–84.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1028544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veronica Johnston
    • 1
  • Sonja P. Brubacher
    • 2
    Email author
  • Martine Powell
    • 2
  • Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Investigative Interviewing, Griffith Criminology InstituteGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations