What Factors Affect Learners’ Ability to Interpret Nonverbal Behaviors in EFL Classrooms?
This study examined how learners’ age, English proficiency, and years of learning English, affect the accuracy of the interpretation of nonverbal behaviors among English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. The participants consisted of four groups of Japanese students: (a) 32 sixth graders attending public schools, (b) 18 sixth graders attending English immersion schools, (c) 30 university students with lower English proficiency, and (d) 32 university students with higher English proficiency. They watched 48 video clips taken from EFL classrooms in Japanese elementary schools without sound and judged whether the teachers had asked a question. The accuracy of their judgements was statistically analyzed and their comments were qualitatively analyzed. Multiple regression analyses pointed to students’ years of learning English as the sole predictor almost significantly affecting accurate judgements but only when teachers’ utterances were accompanied by gestures. This indicates that learners’ ability to correctly decode nonverbal behaviors developed only for teacher gesture. In addition to this qualitative aspect, a quantitative aspect was also found to be affected by the duration of study. Precisely speaking, those learners with over 6 years of learning English noticed a larger number of nonverbal behaviors, including gestures, for correct judgements, which boosted the minimum accuracy of their judgements. This implies that the effect of age and nativeness observed in past literature on the interpretation of nonverbal behaviors may have been in fact under the disguise of the amount of exposure to the target language and culture.
KeywordsEnglish as a foreign language classrooms Teacher gesture Questions Classroom experience
I am very grateful to all the participants as well as school administrators and principals who allowed me to recruit their pupils for this project. I am also thankful to Mark Freiermuth for proofreading in his busy schedule.
This research was supported by the Prefecture of Gunma for a grant for research at Gunma Prefectural Women’s University.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Human and Animal Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Allen, L. Q. (2000). Nonverbal accommodations in foreign language teacher talk. Applied Language Learning, 11(1), 155–176.Google Scholar
- Argyle, M. (1994). The psychology of interpersonal behaviour (5th ed.). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Nonverbal signals. In M. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 229–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D., & Woodall, G. W. (1989). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialog. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for language: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–533.Google Scholar
- Ginsburg, H. P., & Opper, S. (1987). Piaget’s theory of intellectual development. New York, NY: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Long, M. H., Brock, C., Crookes, G., Deicke, C., Potter, L., & Zhang, S. (1984). The effect of teachers’ questioning patterns and wait-time on pupil participation in public high school classes in Hawaii for students of limited English proficiency. Technical Report No. 1. Honolulu, HI: Center for Second Language Classroom Research, Social Science Research Institute, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
- Long, M. H., & Sato, C. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers’ questions. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268–285). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
- McIntyre, N. A., Mainhard, M. T., & Klassen, R. M. (2017). Are you looking to teach? Cultural, temporal and dynamic insights into expert teacher gaze. Learning and Instruction, 49, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Miller, T. (1995). Japanese learners’ reactions to communicative English lessons. JALT Journal, 17(1), 31–52.Google Scholar
- Muñoz, C. (Ed.). (2006). Age and rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Ojima, S., Matsubara-Kurita, H., Nakamura, N., & Hagiwara, H. (2011). Age and amount of exposure to a foreign language during childhood: Behavioral and ERP data on the semantic comprehension of spoken English by Japanese children. Neuroscience Research, 70(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2011.01.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Plonsky, L. (2015). Statistical power, p values, descriptive statistics, and effect sizes: A “backp-to-basics” approach to advancing quantitative methods in L2 research. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 23–45). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sime, D. (2008). “Because of her gesture, it’s very easy to understand”—Learners’ perceptions of teachers’ gestures in the foreign language class. In S. G. McCafferty & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research (pp. 259–279). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Stam, G. (2008). What gestures reveal about second language acquisition. In S. G. McCafferty & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research (pp. 231–255). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Steinmetz, S., & Dowling, J. L. (Eds.). (1998). Random house Webster’s college dictionary. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar