The Voluntary Facial Action Technique: A Method to Test the Facial Feedback Hypothesis
According to the facial feedback hypothesis, facial muscles do not only express emotions, they also have the ability to modulate subjective experiences of emotions and to initiate emotions. This study examined the voluntary facial action technique, where participants were instructed to react with the Zygomatic major muscle (smile) or the Corrugator supercilii muscle (frown) when exposed to different stimuli. The results demonstrate that the technique effectively induces facial feedback effects. Through use of this technique we further addressed three important areas of facial feedback and found, first, that facial feedback did not modulate the experience of positive and negative emotion evoking stimuli differently. Second, the modulating ability provided significant feedback effects, while the initiating ability did not. Third, an effect of feedback remained and could be detected even some time after the critical manipulation. It is concluded that the present technique can be used in the future study of facial feedback.
KeywordsFacial feedback Facial expressions Emotion
This study was supported by grants to Ulf Dimberg from The Swedish Research Council and The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation. We thank Monika Thunberg for helpful comments on the manuscript.
- Dimberg, U. (1997). Facial reactions: Rapidly evoked emotional responses. Journal of Psychophysiology, 11, 115–123.Google Scholar
- Dimberg, U. (2010). The voluntary facial action technique yields comparable frowns and smiles (Manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
- Ekman, P. (1973). Cross-cultural studies of facial expressions. In P. Ekman (Ed.), Darwin and facial expression. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In K. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 319–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Frank, M. G., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2005). Behavioral markers and recognizability of the smile of enjoyment. In P. Ekman & E. L. Rosenberg (Eds.), What the face reveals: Basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) (2nd ed., pp. 217–238). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hennenlotter, A., Dresel, C., Castrop, F., Ceballos Baumann, A. O., Wohlschläger, A. M., & Haslinger, B. (2009). The link between facial feedback and neural activity within central circuitries of emotion—New insights from Botulinum toxin–induced denervation of frown muscles. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 537–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Lundquist, L.-O., & Dimberg, U. (1995). Facial expressions are contagious. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 203–211.Google Scholar
- Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, consciousness, Vol. 1. In: The positive affects. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Tomkins, S. S. (1980). Affect as amplification: Some modifications in theory. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research and experience (pp. 141–164). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar