Effect of an Online Appointment Scheduling System on Evaluation Metrics of Outpatient Scheduling System: a before-after MulticenterStudy
Online appointment scheduling systems have been designed in response to the problems of the traditional ones. In Iran, most outpatient clinics and our study population suffer from high patient’ no-show rate and long waiting times because of not using online appointment scheduling system. In this study, the effect of an online appointment scheduling system was investigated by comparing the evaluation metrics of appointment scheduling before and after the intervention. This before-after pilot study was conducted on ten outpatient clinics with different specializations. Five clinics were selected as the intervention group and five clinics as the control group. A checklist was designed to evaluate appointment scheduling metrics. These checklists were completed from April to July 2017 in the pre-implementation phase and from September to December 2017 in the post-implementation phase. The evaluation metrics were evaluated before and after the implementation of the online appointment scheduling system. A total of 470 checklists containing 9034 patients’ information and 460 checklists containing 9130 patients’ information were completed at the pre- and post-implementation phases, respectively. There were significant positive effect on the improvement of the three metrics means, including Patient waiting time (38.2 min before vs. 23.8 min after the intervention), No-show rate (25% before vs. 11% after the intervention), and Physician punctuality (−30 min before vs. -14.2 min after the intervention). The use of an online appointment scheduling system was successful in improving several evaluation metrics in our target population and resulted in continued usage in intervention group clinics.
KeywordsOnline appointment scheduling system Evaluation metrics Outpatient clinics
This study was supported by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. The authors would like to acknowledge “Research Deputy” Mashhad University of Medical Sciences for financial supports. We thank physicians and staff of 10 outpatient clinics.
This study was funded by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was approved by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. The permission was obtained from the Ethics Committee with No. IR.MUMS.fm.REC1395.312. All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
All physicians and staff of clinics participated voluntarily and were verbally informed about their privacy.
- 1.Zhao, P., Yoo, I., Lavoie, J., Lavoie, B. J., and Simoes, E., Web-based medical appointment systems: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 19(4), 2017.Google Scholar
- 3.Walters, B. A., Danis K, editors. Patient Online at Dartmouth-Hitchcock–Interactive Patient Care Web Site. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003:1044, 2003.Google Scholar
- 4.Grain H, editor. Patients’ adoption of the e-appointment scheduling service: A case study in primary healthcare. Investing in E-Health: People, Knowledge and Technology for a Healthy Future: Selected Papers from the 22nd Australian National Health Informatics Conference (HIC 2014); 2014: IOS Press.Google Scholar
- 7.Maeder A, Martin-Sanchez F, editors. Patients’ perceptions of web self-service applications in primary healthcare. Health Informatics: Building a Healthcare Future through Trusted Information: Selected Papers from the 20th Australian National Health Informatics Conference (HIC 2012); 2012: IOS Press.Google Scholar
- 9.Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., and Forget, P., Adoption, use, and impact of e-booking in private medical practices: Mixed-methods evaluation of a two-year showcase project in Canada. JMIR Med Inform. 2(2), 2014.Google Scholar
- 12.Mohebbifar, R., Hasanpoor, E., Mohseni, M., Sokhanvar, M., Khosravizadeh, O., and Isfahani, H. M., Outpatient waiting time in health services and teaching hospitals: A case study in Iran. Glob J Health Sci. 6(1):172, 2014.Google Scholar
- 13.Aeenparast, A., Farzadi, F., and Maftoon, F., Waiting time for specialist consultation in Tehran. Arch Iran Med. 15(12), 2012.Google Scholar
- 14.Bastani, P., Garavand, A., and Abhari, S., Evaluation of internet booking system in websites of health centers affiliated with medical universities in Iran. Journal of Health and Biomedical Informatics. 2(4):219–228, 2016.Google Scholar
- 15.Murray, M., Reducing waits and delays in the referral process. Family practice management. 9(3):39, 2002.Google Scholar
- 16.Golalizadeh E, Moosazadeh M, Amiresmaili M, Ahangar N. Challenges in second level of referral system in family physician plan: A qualitative research. 2012.Google Scholar
- 17.Rohleder, T. R., Lewkonia, P., Bischak, D. P., Duffy, P., and Hendijani, R., Using simulation modeling to improve patient flow at an outpatient orthopedic clinic. Health Care Manag Sci. 14(2):135–145, 2011.Google Scholar
- 26.Siddiqui, Z., and Rashid, R., Cancellations and patient access to physicians: ZocDoc and the evolution of e-medicine. Dermatol Online J. 19(4), 2013.Google Scholar
- 27.Samadbeik, M., Saremian, M., Garavand, A., Hasanvandi, N., Sanaeinasab, S., and Tahmasebi, H., Assessing the online outpatient booking system. Shiraz E-Medical Journal. 19(4), 2018.Google Scholar
- 29.McMullen, M. J., and Netland, P. A., Lead time for appointment and the no-show rate in an ophthalmology clinic. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, NZ). 9:513, 2015.Google Scholar