Advertisement

Controlling a Lower-Leg Exoskeleton Using Voltage and Current Variation Signals of a DC Motor Mounted at the Knee Joint

  • Muhammad Al-AyyadEmail author
  • Bashar Al-haj Moh’d
  • Nidal Qasem
  • Mohammad Al-Takrori
Mobile & Wireless Health
  • 33 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Mobile & Wireless Health

Abstract

Powered exoskeleton technology helps turns dreams of recovering mobility after paralysis into reality. One of the most common problems encountered in the use of powered exoskeletons is the detection of the motion intentions of the user. Many approaches to conquering this problem have been developed using Electromyography (EMG) sensors, Electroencephalography (EEG) sensors, Center of Pressure (COP), and so forth. When a method, such as the surface EMG, is contaminated with noise during acquisition, it is important to process that raw EMG signal. Doing so usually takes time, and time delays in such a system can lead to a loss in synchronization between the wearer and the exoskeleton. Many algorithms have been developed for data acquisition and the filtering of raw EMG signals as well as accelerometer data. Our approach involves designing an almost sensor-less low limb exoskeleton that is powered by an electric Direct Current (DC) motor, and the same motor is used to detect motion via monitoring the voltage and the current variation. Experimental results are obtained for the actuating knee flexion-to-extension then extension-to-flexion of a sitting person using the National Instrument (NI) MyRIO as a data acquisition system with NI-LabView. The results support the hypothesis that the developed system can detect human motion and drive the motor in the necessary direction without the use of uncomfortable electrodes (sensors) and their connections. Additionally, the system supported the wearer to move his leg up (extension) without having too much effort to do so. In order to identify muscle activation with the change in the angle along the sagittal plane, an accelerometer has been attached to the system. The proposed approach could help open a new pathway along which researchers could develop low-cost and easy-to-wear powered exoskeletons which could emulate precisely the normal gait of a human.

Keywords

Exoskeleton Lower limb DC motor H-bridge Sensor-less EMG LabView Accelerometer Current variation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Borisoff, J. F., Mattie, J., and Rafer, V., Concept proposal for a detachable exoskeleton-wheelchair to improve mobility and health. In: 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). IEEE. (pp. 1–6), 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sundaram, V., Kumar, S., Faiz, A., and Maheshwari, S., Design of lower-limb exoskeleton for wheelchair patients. International. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 7(2):214–2109, 2016.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Looze, M. P., Bosch, T., Krause, F., Stadler, K. S., and O’Sullivan, L. W., Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics 59(5):671–681, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cho, Y. K., Kim, K., Ma, S., and Ueda, J. A robotic wearable exoskeleton for construction worker’s safety and health. ASCE Construction Research Congress 2018: Safety and Disaster Management. ASCE. 19–28, 2018.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miao, Y., Gao, F., and Pan, D., Mechanical design of a hybrid leg exoskeleton to augment load-carrying for walking. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. SAGE 10(11):395–410, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baldovino, R. G., and Jamisola, Jr., R. S., A survey in the different designs and control systems of powered-exoskeleton for lower extremities. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Biomechanics (JMEB). Rational Publication 1(4):103–115, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harib, O., Hereid, A., Agrawal, A., Gurriet, T., Finet, S., Boeris, G., Duburcq, A., Mungai, M. E., Masselin, M., Ames, A. D., and Sreenath, K., Feedback control of an exoskeleton for paraplegics: Toward robustly stable, hands-free dynamic walking. IEEE Control. Syst. Mag. IEEE 38(6):61–87, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zeilig, G., Weingarden, H., Zwecker, M., Dudkiewicz, I., Bloch, A., and Esquenazi, A., Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk™ exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people with complete spinal cord injury: A pilot study. J. Spinal Cord Med. Taylor and Francis 35(2):96–101, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rupal, B. S., Rafique, S., Singla, A., Singla, E., Isaksson, M., and Virk, G. S., Lower-limb exoskeletons: Research trends and regulatory guidelines in medical and non-medical applications. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. SAGE 14(6):1–27, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malcolm, P., Derave, W., Galle, S., and De Clercq, D., A simple exoskeleton that assists plantarflexion can reduce the metabolic cost of human walking. PLoS One 8(2):e56137 (pp. 1–7), 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    National Research Council, Meeting the energy needs of future warriors. Washington: National Academies Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hurmuzlu, Y., and Nwokah, O. D., The mechanical systems design handbook: Modeling, measurement, and control. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Okada, K., Inaba, M., and Inoue, H., Real-time and precise self collision detection system for humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE. (pp. 1060–1065), 2015.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim, J. H., Shim, M., Ahn, D. H., Son, B. J., Kim, S. Y., Kim, D. Y., Baek, Y. S., and Cho, B. K., Design of a knee exoskeleton using foot pressure and knee torque sensors. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. SAGE 12(8):112–126, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    He, Y., Eguren, D., Azorín, J. M., Grossman, R. G., Luu, T. P., and Contreras-Vidal, J. L., Brain–machine interfaces for controlling lower-limb powered robotic systems. J. Neural Eng. IOP Pub. 15(2):021004, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wong, C., Zhang, Z. Q., Lo, B., and Yang, G. Z., Wearable sensing for solid biomechanics: A review. IEEE Sensors J. IEEE 15(5):2747–2760, 2015.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seeland, A., Tabie, M., Kim, S. K., Kirchner, F., and Kirchner, E. A., Adaptive multimodal biosignal control for exoskeleton supported stroke rehabilitation. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE. (pp. 2431–2436), 2017.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chowdhury, R., Reaz, M., Ali, M., Bakar, A., Chellappan, K., and Chang, T., Surface electromyography signal processing and classification techniques. Sensors. MDPI 13(9):12431–12466, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jung, J. Y., Heo, W., Yang, H., and Park, H., A neural network-based gait phase classification method using sensors equipped on lower limb exoskeleton robots. Sensors. MDPI 15(11):27738–27759, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schnieders, T. M., and Stone, R. T., Current work in the human-machine interface for ergonomic intervention with exoskeletons. International Journal of Robotics Applications and Technologies (IJRAT). IGI Global 5(1):1–9, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bitter, R., Mohiuddin, T., and Nawrocki, M., LabVIEW: Advanced programming techniques. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chachati, L., and Hasan, A., Designing and implementing an electronic system to control moving orthosis virtual mechanical system to emulate lower limb. Cogent Engineering. Taylor and Francis. 5(1):1456632 (pp. 1–14), 2018.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fleischer, C., Wege, A., Kondak, K., and Hommel, G., Application of EMG signals for controlling exoskeleton robots. Biomed. Tech. Walter de Gruyter 51(5/6):314–319, 2016.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sen, P., Principles of electric machines and power electronics. Hoboken: Wiley, 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringAl-Ahliyya Amman UniversityAmmanJordan
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringAl-Ahliyya Amman UniversityAmmanJordan
  3. 3.School of Industrial and Information EngineeringPolitecnico di Milano UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations