Wireless Endocardial Atrial (and Ventricular) Sensing with no Implanted Power Source: a Proposal
- 39 Downloads
Cardiac electrical activity is mainly evaluated by monitoring the electrical biosignals. This requires a long-lasting power supply to make implantable devices cost-effective and efficient. Since the current trend is to implant catheter-free stand-alone electrodes (implantable cardiac monitors), the need for smaller devices is at odds with the need for long-life batteries. To avoid these problems, we propose a passive endocardial sensor able to monitor the movement of the considered chamber based on a permanent magnet shaped for implantation in the internal chamber of the heart (i.e. the right atrium) and an external gauss meter unit to measure sensor-induced magnetic field variations. Since the magnet is permanent, no replacement is needed after the first implant, thereby reducing the risks linked to invasive procedures, and the battery in the external device can be substituted more easily. To test our idea we used a permanent magnet mounted on the tip of a commercial catheter for heart mapping together with a dedicated gauss meter built in our laboratory. The device was tested in vitro and the magnetic field variations were acquired and measured in different conditions of movement and distances. The results demonstrate the feasibility of our approach and open an interesting new scenario where permanent magnets can be used to monitor the mechanical behaviour of the heart.
KeywordsAtrial activities Endocardial wireless sensors Magnetic sensor Gauss meter
Compliance with Ethical Standards
We certify that:
1) there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript;
2) this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors;
3) no funds were received for this study.
Pier Luca Rossi
- 1.Priori, S. G., Blomström-Lundqvist, C., Mazzanti, A., Blom, N., Borggrefe, M., Camm, J. et al., 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac deathThe task force for the Management of Patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). EP Eur. 17:1601–1687, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Diemberger, I., Mazzotti, A., Giulia, M. B., Biffi, M., Cristian, M., Massaro, G. et al., From lead management to implanted patient management: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the last 15 years of experience in lead extraction. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 10:551–573, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.2013.811837.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.De Maria, E., Diemberger, I., Vassallo, P. L., Pastore, M., Giannotti, F., Ronconi, C. et al., Prevention of infections in cardiovascular implantable electronic devices beyond the antibiotic agent. J. Cardiovasc. Med. Hagerstown Md 15:554–564, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000000008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Domenichini, G., Gonna, H., Sharma, R., Conti, S., Fiorista, L., Jones, S. et al., Non-laser percutaneous extraction of pacemaker and defibrillation leads: A decade of progress. Eur. Eur. Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol. J. Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell. Electrophysiol. Eur. Soc. Cardiol. 19:1521–1526, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Kancharla, K., Acker, N. G., Li, Z., Samineni, S., Cai, C., Espinosa, R. E. et al., Efficacy and safety of Transvenous Lead extraction in the device laboratory and operating room guided by a novel risk stratification scheme. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 5:174–182, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2019.01.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Ciconte, G., Giacopelli, D., and Pappone, C., The role of implantable cardiac monitors in atrial fibrillation management. J. Atr. Fibrillation 10, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.1590.
- 11.Corzani, A., Ziacchi, M., Biffi, M., Allaria, L., Diemberger, I., Martignani, C. et al., Clinical management of electromagnetic interferences in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Review of the literature and focus on magnetic resonance conditional devices. J Cardiovasc. Med. Hagerstown Md 16:704–713, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000000301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Solari, D., Bertero, E., Miceli, R., Brunelli, C., Ameri, P., and Canepa, M., Methods, accuracy and clinical implications of atrial fibrillation detection by cardiac implantable electronic devices. Int. J. Cardiol. 236:262–269, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Leischik, R., Littwitz, H., Dworrak, B., Garg, P., Zhu, M., and Sahn, D.J., et al., Echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial mechanics: Function, history, novel techniques, advantages, and pitfalls. BioMed Res Int 2015. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2015/765921/ (accessed March 14, 2018).
- 19.Tyers, G. F., Mills, P., Clark, J., Cheesman, M., Yeung-Lai-Wah, J. A., and Brownlee, R. R., Bipolar leads for use with permanently implantable cardiac pacing systems: A review of limitations of traditional and coaxial configurations and the development and testing of new conductor, insulation, and electrode designs. J. Investig. Surg. Off. J. Acad. Surg. Res. 10:1–15, 1997.Google Scholar
- 24.Misra, S., Zahid, S., Prakosa, A., Saju, N., Tandri, H., Berger, R. D. et al., Field of view of mapping catheters quantified by electrogram associations with radius of myocardial attenuation on contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography. Heart Rhythm 15:1617–1625, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.05.031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar