Advertisement

Geometric Model for the Postural Characterization in the Sagital Plane of Lumbar Raquis

  • Pilar San Pedro
  • Fernando Blaya
  • Roberto D’AmatoEmail author
  • Juan A. Juanes
  • Luis Tomás Gallego Morales
  • José Antonio Rodríguez Montes
Education & Training
  • 64 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Technological Innovations in Biomedical Training and Practice (TEEM 2018)

Abstract

The individual’s posture is the physical expression of his body. It is modified throughout life and it is determined by the particular anatomical characteristics that directly affect the biomechanics of the spine. The typing of the spinal curvature is important for the knowledge of body posture. The possibility of having a method for the systematic postural characterization of the spine is an essential objective resource in order to obtain normal or control patterns of the spinal morphology of the population. A widely accepted methodology of morphological characterization of the spine is a necessary requirement for the establishment of preventive criteria for spinal pathologies based on epidemiological population studies. It also represents a necessary requirement for the classification of individuals, based on the biomechanical, orthopaedic or ergonomic criteria necessary for disciplines such as sports, industrial design or sports performance. The present study proposes the development of a morphological postural model of the spine in the lumbar region. The model is based on a system of measurement of objective and comparable parameters by means of X-ray analysis, in order to characterize its morphology in the sagittal plane. The comparison of the results in a population of 47 individuals allowed the possibility to carry out a statistical study on three morphological parameters: sacral angle (α1); reversal angle (α2) and degree of lordosis (DL). The statistical hypothesis that the results behave according to a normal distribution with p < 0.05 is relevant and allows the systematization and postural modelling of the individual.

Keywords

Morphological model Lumbar región Spine 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Pilar San Pedro declares that he has no conflict of interest. Fernando Blaya declares that he has no conflict of interest. Roberto D’Amato declares that he has no conflict of interest. Juan A. Juanes declares that he has no conflict of interest. Luis Tomás Gallego Morales declares that he has no conflict of interest. José Antonio Rodríguez Montes declares that he has no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Gagey, P.-M., Weber, B., and Faig Martí, J., Posturología: regulación y alteraciones de la bipedestación. Masson, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernhardt, M., and Bridwell, K. H., Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:717–721, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gelb, D. E., Lenke, L. G., Bridwell, K. H., Blanke, K., and McEnery, K. W., An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1351–1358, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miller-Keane, B. F., and O’Toole, M. T., Encyclopedia &amp; dictionary of medicine, nursing, and allied health. Saunders, 2003.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maniadakis, N., and Gray, A., The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 84:95–103, 2000.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00187-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rajnics, P., Pomero, V., Templier, A., Lavaste, F., and Illes, T., Computer-assisted assessment of spinal sagittal plane radiographs. J. Spinal Disord. 14:135–142, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jackson, R. P., Kanemura, T., Kawakami, N., and Hales, C., Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:575–586, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harrison, D. D., Harrison, D. E., Janik, T. J., Cailliet, R., and Haas, J., Do Alterations in Vertebral and Disc Dimensions Affect an Elliptical Model of Thoracic Kyphosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:463–469, 2003.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000048648.73805.98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harrison, D. D., Cailliet, R., Janik, T. J., Troyanovich, S. J., Harrison, D. E., and Holland, B., Elliptical modeling of the sagittal lumbar lordosis and segmental rotation angles as a method to discriminate between normal and low back pain subjects. J. Spinal Disord. 11:430–439, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar, M. N., Baklanov, A., and Chopin, D., Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur. Spine J. 10:314–319, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Akamaru, T., Kawahara, N., Tim Yoon, S., Minamide, A., Su Kim, K., Tomita, K., and Hutton, W. C., Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1560–1566, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wenger, D. R., and Frick, S. L., Scheuermann kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2630–2639, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruiz Santiago, F., Guzmán Álvarez, L., Tello Moreno, M., and Navarrete González, P. J., Plain-film radiography in the study of spinal pain. Radiologia 52:126–137, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rx.2009.12.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cano-Gómez, C., Rodríguez de la Rúa, J., García-Guerrero, G., Juliá-Bueno, J., and Marante-Fuertes, J., Physiopathology of lumbar spine degeneration and pain. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 52:37–46, 2008.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vedantam, R., Lenke, L. G., Keeney, J. A., and Bridwell, K. H., Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:211–215, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uritani, D., Reliability of Upper Quadrant Posture Analysis Using an Ultrasound-based Three-dimensional Motion Analyzer. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 25:1181–1184, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.1181.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goh, S., Price, R. I., Leedman, P. J., and Singer, K. P., Rasterstereographic analysis of the thoracic sagittal curvature: a reliability study. J. Musculoskelet. Res. 03:137–142, 1999.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218957799000142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shaheen, A. A. M., and Basuodan, R. M., Quantitative Assessment of Head Posture of Young Adults Based on Lateral View Photographs. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 24:391–394, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.24.391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nam, S. H., Son, S. M., Kwon, J. W., and Lee, N. K., The Intra- and Inter-rater Reliabilities of the Forward Head Posture Assessment of Normal Healthy Subjects. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 25:737–739, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.737.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wunderlich, M., Rüther, T., Essfeld, D., Erren, T. C., Piekarski, C., and Leyk, D., A new approach to assess movements and isometric postures of spine and trunk at the workplace. Eur. Spine J. 20:1393–1402, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1777-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brink, Y., Louw, Q., and Grimmer-Somers, K., The quality of evidence of psychometric properties of three-dimensional spinal posture-measuring instruments. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 12:93, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bushong, S. C., Manual de Radiología para Técnicos, 9a. Barcelona: Grafos S.A, 2010.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Corbella Barrios, D., Técnicas de representación geométrica : fundamentos de concepción espacial. Madrid: El autor, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical University of MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.University of SalamancaSalamancaSpain
  3. 3.Hospital Universitario La PazUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations