Performance Evaluation of Jaipur Knee Joint through Kinematics and Kinetics Gait Symmetry with Unilateral Transfemoral Indian Amputees

  • Pawan MishraEmail author
  • Sachin Singh
  • Vinayak Ranjan
  • Sonu Singh
  • Ankit Vidyarthi
Systems-Level Quality Improvement
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Systems-Level Quality Improvement


Gait analysis is considered as the most systematic study of human motion. The analysis of gait includes visual and analytical perception of the individual, augmentation of various mechanical instrumentations for measuring movement of body, muscles activity and body mechanics. Past study focused on gait analysis of various animal locomotion and humans mainly on sports biomechanics. This paper aims to quantify the gait performance with Jaipur Knee, which is one of the most widely used prosthesis in Indian population. Gait data with Jaipur knee joint is not available till date. The proposed study targets to predict the performance of Jaipur knee joint in terms of gait symmetry with transfemoral Indian amputees. Gait symmetry may be the basis of recommendation of knee joint to prosthetic patients. This study used kinematics and kinetics parameters together to quantify the performance of Jaipur knee joint to evaluate gait symmetry. This research will be helpful for clinician to predict and further to prevent the degenerated musculoskeletal effects generally seen in unilateral transfemoral amputees.


Amputation Gait analysis Jaipur knee Transfemoral Prosthesis 



The study described was guided by the department of mechanical engineering, Indian Institute of Technology -Indian School of Mines (IIT-ISM) Dhanbad, under the PhD program support and gait lab facility was provided by Research & Referral hospital, New Delhi. We acknowledge the motivation of Bhagwan Mahaveer Sahayta Samiti, Jaipur. We acknowledge the cooperation of all subjects participated in the study, without their support the study was not possible. The authors are solely the responsible for the content and authors do not necessarily represent the official view of any organization.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Hodgins, D., The importance of measuring human gait. Med. Device Technol. 19(5):44–47, 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balzac, H. D., Theorie de la Demarche. Paris: Didier, 1853.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collado Vazqueza, S., and Carrillo, J., Balzac and human gait analysis. Neurologia 30(4):240–246, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tamakrishnan, T., Lahiff, C., and Reed, K. B., Comparing gait with multiple physical asymmetries using consolidated metrices. Frontoers in Nerorobotics 12(2):1–12, 2018.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inc., T. M.: Time Megazine, 2009., [Accessed 31/05/2018]
  6. 6., Bhagwan Mahavir Sahayta Samiti, Jaipur, 2016. [Accessed 31 May 2018]
  7. 7.
    Jaegers, S. M. H. J., Arendzen, J. H., and De Jongh, H. J.: The prosthetic gait of unilateral transfemoral amputees: a kinematic study. 76(8):736–43, 1995Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bautmans, I., Jansen, B., Van Keymolen, B., and Mets, T., Reliability and clinical correlates of 3D-accelerometry based gait analysis outcomes according to age and fall-risk. Gait Posture 33(3):366–72, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kulkarni, J., Adams, J., Thomas, E., and Silman, A., Association between amputation, arthritis and osteopenia in british male war veterans with major lower limb amputations. Clin. Rehabil. 12:348–353, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johansson, J., Sherrill, D., Riley, P., Bonato, P., and Herr, H., A clinical coparison of variable damping and mechanically passive prosthetic knee devices. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84:563–575, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jaroslav, U., Jandacka, D., Farana, R., Zahradnik, D., Rosicky, J., and Janura, M., Kinematics of gait using bionic and hydraulic knee joints in transfemoral amputees. Acta Gymnica 47(3):130–137, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robinson, R., Herzog, W., and Nigg, B., Use of force plateform variables to quantify the effects of chiropractic manipulation on gait symmetry. Manipulative Physiotherapy 10:172–176 , 1987.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zifchock, R., Davis, I., and Higginson, J. R. T., Asymmetry angle: a novel, robust method of quantifying asymmetry. Gait Posture 27:622–627, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sadeghi, H., Local or global asymmetry in gait of people without impairments. Gait Posture 17:197–204, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haddad, J., Van Emmerik, R., Whittlesey, S., and Hamill, J., Adaptions in interlimb and intralimb coordination to asymmetrical loading in human walking. Gait Posture 23:429–434 , 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Al-Fatafta, H., Liu, A., Hutchins, S., and Jones, R.: Knee joint kinematics and kinetics during the force plate attachable interlaced stairway climbing (FPAIS) in healthy individuals. Prosthetics and Orthotics Open Journal:1–15, 2017Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang, L., Solomonidis, S., and Spence, W. P. J., The influence of limb alignment on the gait of above knee amputees. J. Biomech. 24:981–997, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blumentritt, S., A new biomechanical method for determination of static prosthetic alignment. Prosthetics Orthot. Int. 21:107–113, 1997.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crenshaw, S., and Richards, J., A method for analyzing joint symmetry abnormally with an applications to analyzing gait. Gait Posture 24:515–521, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaufman, K., Levine, J., Brey, R., Mccrady, S., Padgett, D., and Joyner, M., Energy expenditure and activity of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocesssor controlled prosthetic knees. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 87:1382–1385 , 2008.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lelas, J., Merriman, G., Riley, P., and Kerrigan, D., Predicting peak kinematic and kinetic parameters from gait speed. Gait Posture 17:106–112, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nolan, L., Wit, A., Dudzinski, K., Lees, A., Lake, M., and Wychowansky, M., Adjustments in gait symmetry with walking speed in transfemoral and trandtibial amputees. Gait Posture 17:142–151, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology (IIT-ISM)DhanbadIndia
  2. 2.Bennett UniversityGreater NoidaIndia
  3. 3.Army Hospital, R&RNew DelhiIndia
  4. 4.Jaypee Institute of Information TechnologyNoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations