A Group Decision Making Framework Based on Neutrosophic TOPSIS Approach for Smart Medical Device Selection
- 44 Downloads
Advances in the medical industry has become a major trend because of the new developments in information technologies. This research offers a novel approach for estimating the smart medical devices (SMDs) selection process in a group decision making (GDM) in a vague decision environment. The complexity of the selected decision criteria for the smart medical devices is a significant feature of this analysis. To simulate these processes, a methodology that combines neutrosophics using bipolar numbers with Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) under GDM is suggested. Neutrosophics with TOPSIS approach is applied in the decision making process to deal with the vagueness, incomplete data and the uncertainty, considering the decisions criteria in the data collected by the decision makers (DMs). In this research, the stress is placed upon the choosing of sugar analyzing smart medical devices for diabetics’ patients. The main objective is to present the complications of the problem, raising interest among specialists in the healthcare industry and assessing smart medical devices under different evaluation criteria. The problem is formulated as a multi criteria decision type with seven alternatives and seven criteria, and then edited as a multi criteria decision model with seven alternatives and seven criteria. The results of the neutrosophics with TOPSIS model are analyzed, showing that the competence of the acquired results and the rankings are sufficiently stable. The results of the suggested method are also compared with the neutrosophic extensions AHP and MOORA models in order to validate and prove the acquired results. In addition, we used the SPSS program to check the stability of the variations in the rankings by the Spearman coefficient of correlation. The selection methodology is applied on a numerical case, to prove the validity of the suggested approach.
KeywordsBipolar neutrosophic numbers Smart medical devices Group decision making TOPSIS method Multi criteria decision making
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared that we do not have any conflict of interest for this research work. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 4.Liang, R., Wang, J., and Zhang, H., A multi-criteria decision-making method based on single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic preference relations with complete weight information. Neural Computing and Applications., 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2925-8.
- 5.Smarandache, F., Neutrosophic set - a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set. 2006 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, n.d. https://doi.org/10.1109/grc.2006.1635754.
- 8.Abdel-Basset, M., Manogaran, G., Gamal, A., and Smarandache, F., A hybrid approach of neutrosophic sets and DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Design Automation for Embedded Systems., 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10617-018-9203-6.
- 9.Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, M., Hussien, A.-N., and Sangaiah, A. K., A novel group decision-making model based on triangular neutrosophic numbers. Soft Computing., 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2758-5.
- 14.Brauers, W. K. et al., The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control Cybern. 2006(35):445–469, 2006.Google Scholar
- 17.F. Smarandache, A Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophic Logic. Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability: Neutrosophic Logic. Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability: Infinite Study, 2005.Google Scholar
- 20.Abdel-Basset, M. G., Mohamed, M., and Smarandache, F., A novel method for solving the fully neutrosophic linear programming problems. Neural Computing and Applications:1–11.Google Scholar
- 22.Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, M., and Sangaiah, A. K., Neutrosophic AHP-Delphi group decision making model based on trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing:1–17, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0548-7.
- 27.Chang, V., Abdel-Basset, M., and Ramachandran, M., Towards a reuse strategic decision pattern framework–from theories to practices. Information Systems Frontiers:1–18, 2018.Google Scholar
- 29.Metwalli, M. A. B., Atef, A., and Smarandache, F., A hybrid Neutrosophic multiple criteria group decision making approach for project selection. Cognitive Systems Research., 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.023.
- 30.Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y. Q., and Sunderraman, R., Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace and Multistructure 4:10–413, 2010.Google Scholar
- 32.Manemaran, S. and B. J. I. J. o. C. A. Chellappa (2010). Structures on bipolar fuzzy groups and bipolar fuzzy D-ideals under (T, S) norms. International Journal of Computer Applications, 9(12): 7–10.Google Scholar