Advertisement

Journal of Medical Systems

, 42:232 | Cite as

Finding Parameters around the Abdomen for a Vibrotactile System: Healthy and Patients with Parkinson’s Disease

  • Helena Gonçalves
  • Rui Moreira
  • Ana Rodrigues
  • Cristina Santos
Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • 23 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Abstract

Freezing of Gait (FOG) is one of the most disabling gait disorders in Parkinson’s Disease (PD), for which the efficacy of the medication is reduced, highlighting the use of non-pharmacological solutions. In particular, patients present less difficulties in overcoming FOG when using feedback and especially with Biofeedback Systems. In this study it is intended to detect the frequency threshold and the minimum interval of perception of the vibrotactile feedback, through a proposed wearable system, a waistband. Experimental tests were carried out that considered a temporal, spatial and spatiotemporal context, for which 15 healthy and 15 PD patients participated. It was detected as threshold frequency 180 Hz and for minimum interval of vibration perception 250 ms. The identification of this threshold frequency and this interval will allow us to select the frequency and the minimum interval of vibration to be used in a Vibrotactile Biofeedback Device for patients with PD, in order to help them to overcome FOG.

Keywords

Freezing of gait Biofeedback Vibrotactile perception Frequency 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia - with the reference project UID/EEA/04436/2013, by FEDER funds through the COMPETE 2020 – Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) - with the reference project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006941.

Funding

This study was not funded.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Helena Gonçalves, Rui Moreira, Ana Rodrigues and Cristina Santos declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Plotnik, M., Giladi, N., Balash, Y., Peretz, C., and Hausdorff, J. M., Is freezing of gait related to asymmetric rhythmic motor performance in patients with is freezing of gait in Parkinson ’ s disease related to asymmetric motor function? Mov. Disord. 57:656–663, 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomas, B., and Beal, M. F., Parkinson’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16(2):183–194, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davie, C. A., A review of Parkinson’s disease. Br. Med. Bull. 86(1):109–127, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Parkinson’s disease: Challenges, progess and promise. Genetics, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Šumec, R., Filip, P., Sheardová, K., and Bareš, M., Psychological benefits of nonpharmacological methods aimed for improving balance in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review. Behav. Neurol. 2015:620674, 2015.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lammoglia, J. P., Designing for gait assistance in Parkinson’s disease. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2015.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ginis, P., Nackaerts, E., Nieuwboer, A., and Heremans, E., Cueing for people with Parkinson’s disease with freezing of gait: A narrative review of the state-of-the-art and novel perspectives. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med., 2017.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ashoori, A., Eagleman, D. M., and Jankovic, J., Effects of auditory rhythm and music on gait disturbances in Parkinson’s disease. Front. Neurol. 6, 2015.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Velik, R., Effect of on-demand cueing on freezing of gait in Parkinson ’ s patients. Int. J. Medical, Pharm. Sci. Eng. 6(6):10–15, 2012.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holland, S., Wright, R., Wing, A., Crevoisier, T., Hodl, O., and Canelli, M., A gait rehabilitation pilot study using tactile cueing following Hemiparetic stroke. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Pervasive Comput. Technol. Healthc. 402–405, 2014.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Velázquez, R., Bazán, O., Alonso, C., and Delgado-Mata, C., Vibrating insoles for tactile communication with the feet. IEEE 15th Int. Conf. Adv. Robot. New Boundaries Robot. ICAR 2011. 118–123, 2011.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nanhoe-Mahabier, W., Allum, J. H., Pasman, E. P., Overeem, S., and Bloem, B. R., The effects of vibrotactile biofeedback training on trunk sway in Parkinson’s disease patients. Park. Relat. Disord. 18(9):1017–1021, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rossi-Izquierdo, M. et al., Vibrotactile neurofeedback balance training in patients with Parkinson’s disease: Reducing the number of falls. Gait Post. 37(2):195–200, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Winfree, K. N., Pretzer-Aboff, I., Hilgart, D., Aggarwal, R., Behari, M., and Agrawal, S. K., The effect of step-synchronized vibration on patients with parkinson’s disease: Case studies on subjects with freezing of gait or an implanted deep brain stimulator. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 21(5):806–811, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ma, C. Z. H., Wan, A. H. P., Wong, D. W. C., Zheng, Y. P., and Lee, W. C. C., A vibrotactile and plantar force measurement-based biofeedback system: Paving the way towards wearable balance-improving devices. Sensors (Switzerland) 15(12):31709–31722, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gonçalves, H., Minas, G., Rodrigues, A. and Santos, C., Literature review of vibrotactile systems addressing freezing of gait in Parkinsonians. 17th IEEE Int. Conf.Auton. Robot Syst. Compet. 104–109, 2017.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Myles, K. and Binseel, M. S., The tactile modality : A review of tactile sensitivity and human tactile interfaces. Army Res. Lab. 1–27, 2007.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Szecsi, J., Schlick, C., Schiller, M., Pöllmann, W., Koenig, N., and Straube, A., Functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycling of patients with multiple sclerosis: Biomechanical and functional outcome--a pilot study. J. Rehabil. Med. 41(8):674–680, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsukada, K., and Yasumura, M., Activebelt: Belt-type wearable tactile display for directional navigation. UbiComp 2004 Ubiquitous Comput. 3205:384–399, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cholewiak, R. W., Brill, J. C., and Schwab, A., Vibrotactile localization on the abdomen: Effects of place and space. Percept. Psychophys. 66(6):970–987, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malamud-Kessler, C., Estañol-Vidal, B., Ayala-Anaya, S., Sentíes-Madrid, H., and Hernández-Camacho, M. A., Fisiología de la vibración. Rev. Mex. Neurocienc. 15(3):163–170, 2014.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    White, T. L., Suitable body locations and vibrotactile cueing types for dismounted soldiers. 2010.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Central, P., Basic gait parameters : reference data for normal subjects 10–79 years of age. 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Microelectromechanical Systems (CMEMS)GuimarãesPortugal
  2. 2.NeurologyHospital of BragaBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations