Location of Reference Electrode Does Not Interfere on Electromyographic Parameters in the Domains of Time and Frequency
- 70 Downloads
There is currently little information on the positioning of reference electrode (RE). It is generally accepted that it must be positioned on electrically neutral tissues, such as tendons or bony prominences. The objective of this study is to analyze the characteristics of the electromyographic signal (EMG) for different positions of RE as well as at different levels of muscle contraction. Signals from the brachial biceps and triceps were recorded from 18 healthy women (BMI: 21.20 kg/m2 ± 1.72; mean age: 21.94 ± 1.98 years old) during 100 and 50% maximum flexion voluntary isometric contractions, as well as at rest. For each situation, the RE was randomly positioned in 4 different locations: a) homolateral acromion; b) homolateral brachial biceps; c) styloid process of the contralateral ulna; and d) lateral malleolus of the contralateral ankle. For statistical analysis, Shapiro-Wilk and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used, followed by Dunn’s post-hoc test, at a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05). RMS, normalized RMS, PSD, median frequency and levels of energy at 60 Hz, 120 Hz and 180 Hz were assessed for the different sites of RE. The results show that the positioning of the RE on the four experimental locations did not change important features of the electromyographic signals in the time and frequency domains, for the three levels of isometric contractions studied. Such findings compel us to re-think the current trend regarding the RE position followed by the great majority of the researches in areas such as physical therapy.
KeywordsElectromyography Reference electrode Root mean square Median frequency Power spectral density
Financial support by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) as well as the Scientific Scholarship Initiation Program of the University of São Paulo.
Compliance with ethical standards
Statement of human rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee with the CEP-HCRP 12788/2011 declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 4.De Sá, A. A. R., Soares, A. B., Andrade, A. O., and Nasuto, S. J., Decomposition of surface Electromyographic signal using hidden Markov model. J. Health Sci 2:28–40, 2014.Google Scholar
- 5.Guirro, R. R. J., Forti, F., and Bigaton, D. R., Proposal for electrical insulation of the electromyographic signal acquisition module. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol 6:355–363, 2006.Google Scholar
- 6.SENIAM. Surface ElectroMyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles [Internet].. [cited 04 jan 2017]. Available from: http://www.seniam.org.
- 9.Girasol, C. E., Dibai-Filho, A. V., De Oliveira, A. K., and Guirro, R. R. J., Correlation Between Skin Temperature Over Myofascial Trigger Points In The Upper Trapezius Muscle And Range Of Motion, Electromyographic Activity, And Pain In Chronic Neck Pain Patients. Journal Of Manipulative And Physiological Therapeutics 41:350–357, 2018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Dibai-Filho, A. V., Oliveira, A. K., Girasol, C. E., Dias, F. R. C., and Guirro, R. R. J., Additional Effect of Static Ultrasound and Diadynamic Currents on Myofascial Trigger Points in a Manual Therapy Program for Patients With Chronic Neck Pain. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 96:243–252, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Marcolino, A. M., Fonseca, M. C. R., Leonardi, N. T., Barbosa, R. I., Neves, L. M. S., and Guirro, R. R. J., The influence of different non-articular proximal forearm orthoses (brace) widths in the wrist extensors muscle activity, range of motion and grip strength in healthy volunteers. Journal Of Back And Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 30:145–151, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Perez, C. S., Das Neves, L. M. S., Vacari, A. L., De Cássia, M. R. F., Guirro, R. R. J., and Guirro, E. C. O., Reduction In Handgrip Strength And Electromyographic Activity In Women With Breast Cancer. Journal Of Back And Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 30:1–6, 2017.Google Scholar