Advertisement

A multistage two-step fraught in phase scheme for problems in mathematical chemistry

  • Mingfei Xu
  • T. E. SimosEmail author
Original Paper
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

The computational solution of systems of differential equations with great interest in Chemistry is the subject of this research. The analysis of the finite difference method of the present research shows the effectiveness of the approach.

Keywords

Phase-lag Derivative of the phase-lag Initial value problems Oscillating solution Symmetric Hybrid Multistep Schrödinger equation 

Mathematics Subject Classification

65L05 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10910_2019_1033_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (221 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 221 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Z.A. Anastassi, T.E. Simos, A parametric symmetric linear four-step method for the efficient integration of the Schrödinger equation and related oscillatory problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236, 3880–3889 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.D. Raptis, T.E. Simos, A four-step phase-fitted method for the numerical integration of second order initial-value problem. BIT 31, 160–168 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.M. Franco, M. Palacios, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 30, 1 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.D. Lambert, Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Systems, The Initial Value Problem (Wiley, Hoboken, 1991), pp. 104–107Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Stiefel, D.G. Bettis, Stabilization of Cowell’s method. Numer. Math. 13, 154–175 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G.A. Panopoulos, Z.A. Anastassi, T.E. Simos, Two new optimized eight-step symmetric methods for the efficient solution of the Schrödinger equation and related problems. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 60(3), 773–785 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G.A. Panopoulos, Z.A. Anastassi, T.E. Simos, Two optimized symmetric eight-step implicit methods for initial-value problems with oscillating solutions. J. Math. Chem. 46(2), 604–620 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    T.E. Simos, P.S. Williams, Bessel and Neumann fitted methods for the numerical solution of the radial Schrödinger equation. Comput. Chem. 21, 175–179 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T.E. Simos, J. Vigo-Aguiar, A dissipative exponentially-fitted method for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation and related problems. Comput. Phys. Commun. 152, 274–294 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Fang, C. Liu, C.-W. Hsu, T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, Explicit hybrid six-step, sixth order, fully symmetric methods for solving \(y^{\prime \prime } =f (x, y)\). Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 42(9), 3305–3314 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Lyche, Chebyshevian multistep methods for ordinary differential eqations. Num. Math. 19, 65–75 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T.E. Simos, P.S. Williams, A finite difference method for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 79, 189–205 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.M. Thomas, Phase properties of high order almost P-stable formulae. BIT 24, 225–238 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.D. Lambert, I.A. Watson, Symmetric multistep methods for periodic initial values problems. J. Inst. Math. Appl. 18, 189–202 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Konguetsof, T.E. Simos, A generator of hybrid symmetric four-step methods for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 158(1), 93–106 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Z. Kalogiratou, T. Monovasilis, T.E. Simos, Symplectic integrators for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 158(1), 83–92 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Z. Kalogiratou, T.E. Simos, Newton-Cotes formulae for long-time integration. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 158(1), 75–82 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. Lin, J.J. Chen, T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, Evolutionary derivation of sixth-order P-stable SDIRKN methods for the solution of PDEs with the method of lines. Mediterr. J. Math. 16(3), 69 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-019-1336-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Z. Kalogiratou, T. Monovasilis, T.E. Simos, New fifth order two-derivative Runge–Kutta methods with constant and frequency dependent coefficients. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 42(6), 1955–1966 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T.E. Simos, I.T. Famelis, C. Tsitouras, Zero dissipative, explicit Numerov-type methods for second order IVPs with oscillating solutions. Numer. Algorithms 34(1), 27–40 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    T.E. Simos, Dissipative trigonometrically-fitted methods for linear second-order IVPs with oscillating solution. Appl. Math. Lett. 17(5), 601–607 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. Tselios, T.E. Simos, Runge–Kutta methods with minimal dispersion and dissipation for problems arising from computational acoustics. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 175(1), 173–181 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D.P. Sakas, T.E. Simos, Multiderivative methods of eighth algrebraic order with minimal phase-lag for the numerical solution of the radial Schrödinger equation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 175(1), 161–172 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. Psihoyios, T.E. Simos, A fourth algebraic order trigonometrically fitted predictor-corrector scheme for IVPs with oscillating solutions. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 175(1), 137–147 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Z.A. Anastassi, T.E. Simos, An optimized Runge–Kutta method for the solution of orbital problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 175(1), 1–9 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    T.E. Simos, Closed Newton–Cotes trigonometrically-fitted formulae of high order for long-time integration of orbital problems. Appl. Math. Lett. 22(10), 1616–1621 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Stavroyiannis, T.E. Simos, Optimization as a function of the phase-lag order of nonlinear explicit two-step P-stable method for linear periodic IVPs. Appl. Numer. Math. 59(10), 2467–2474 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    T.E. Simos, Exponentially and trigonometrically fitted methods for the solution of the Schrödinger equation. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 110(3), 1331–1352 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    T.E. Simos, New stable closed newton-cotes trigonometrically fitted formulae for long-time integration. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, Article ID 182536, 15 (2012)  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/182536
  31. 31.
    T.E. Simos, Optimizing a hybrid two-step method for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation and related problems with respect to phase-lag. J. Appl. Math. 2012, Article ID 420387, 17 (2012)  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/420387
  32. 32.
    I. Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A high algebraic order multistage explicit four-step method with vanished phase-lag and its first, second, third, fourth and fifth derivatives for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 53(8), 1915–1942 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    I. Alolyan, T.E. Simos, Efficient low computational cost hybrid explicit four-step method with vanished phase-lag and its first, second, third and fourth derivatives for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 53(8), 1808–1834 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    I. Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A high algebraic order predictor-corrector explicit method with vanished phase-lag and its first, second, third and fourth derivatives for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation and related problems. J. Math. Chem. 53(7), 1495–1522 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    I. Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A family of explicit linear six-step methods with vanished phase-lag and its first derivative. J. Math. Chem. 52(8), 2087–2118 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    T.E. Simos, An explicit four-step method with vanished phase-lag and its first and second derivatives. J. Math. Chem. 52(3), 833–855 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    I. Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A Runge-Kutta type four-step method with vanished phase-lag and its first and second derivatives for each level for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 52(3), 917–947 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    I. Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A predictor-corrector explicit four-step method with vanished phase-lag and its first, second and third derivatives for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 53(2), 685–717 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    I. Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A hybrid type four-step method with vanished phase-lag and its first, second and third derivatives for each level for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 52(9), 2334–2379 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    G.A. Panopoulos, T.E. Simos, A new optimized symmetric 8-step semi-embedded predictor-corrector method for the numerical solution of the radial Schrödinger equation and related orbital problems. J. Math. Chem. 51(7), 1914–1937 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    T.E. Simos, New high order multiderivative explicit four-step methods with vanished phase-lag and its derivatives for the approximate solution of the Schrödinger equation. Part I: construction and theoretical analysis. J. Math. Chem. 51(1), 194–226 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    T.E. Simos, High order closed Newton–Cotes exponentially and trigonometrically fitted formulae as multilayer symplectic integrators and their application to the radial Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 50(5), 1224–1261 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    D.F. Papadopoulos, T.E. Simos, A modified Runge–Kutta–Nyström method by using phase lag properties for the numerical solution of orbital problems. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 7(2), 433–437 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Z. Th Monovasilis, T.E.Simos Kalogiratou, Exponentially fitted symplectic Runge–Kutta–Nyström methods. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 7(1), 81–85 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    G.A. Panopoulos, T.E. Simos, An optimized symmetric 8-step semi-embedded predictor–corrector method for IVPs with oscillating solutions. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 7(1), 73–80 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    D.F. Papadopoulos, T.E. Simos, The use of phase lag and amplification error derivatives for the construction of a modified Runge–Kutta–Nyström method. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013, 910624 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/910624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    I. Alolyan, Z.A. Anastassi, T.E. Simos, A new family of symmetric linear four-step methods for the efficient integration of the Schrödinger equation and related oscillatory problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 218(9), 5370–5382 (2012)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    I. Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A family of high-order multistep methods with vanished phase-lag and its derivatives for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 62(10), 3756–3774 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ch. Tsitouras, ITh Famelis, T.E. Simos, On modified Runge–Kutta trees and methods. Comput. Math. Appl. 62(4), 2101–2111 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ch. Tsitouras, ITh Famelis, T.E. Simos, Phase-fitted Runge–Kutta pairs of orders 8(7). J. Comput. Appl. Math. 321, 226–231 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Maxim A. Medvedev, T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, Trigonometric-fitted hybrid four-step methods of sixth order for solving \(y^{\prime \prime }(x)=f(x, y)\). Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 42(2), 710–716 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Maxim A. Medvedev, T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, Hybrid, phase-fitted, four-step methods of seventh order for solving x”(t) = f (t, x). Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 42(6), 2025–2032 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, High phase-lag order, four-step methods for solving y” = f(x, y). Appl. Comput. Math. 17(3), 307–316 (2018)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, Evolutionary generation of high order, explicit two step methods for second order linear IVPs. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 40, 6276–6284 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, A new family of 7 stages, eighth-order explicit Numerov-type methods. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 40, 7867–7878 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    D.B. Berg, T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, Trigonometric fitted, eighth-order explicit Numerov-type methods. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41, 1845–1854 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, Fitted modifications of classical Runge–Kutta pairs of orders 5(4). Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41(12), 4549–4559 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ch. Tsitouras, T.E. Simos, Trigonometric fitted explicit Numerov type method with vanishing phase-lag and its first and second derivatives. Mediterr. J. Math. 15(4), Article Number: 168 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-018-1216-7
  59. 59.
    M.A. Medvedev, T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, Fitted modifications of Runge–Kutta pairs of orders 6(5). Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41(16), 6184–6194 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    M.A. Medvedev, T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, Explicit, two stage, sixth order, hybrid four-step methods for solving \(y^{\prime \prime }(x)=f(x, y)\). Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41(16), 6997–7006 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, ITh Famelis, Explicit numerov type methods with constant coefficients: a review. Appl. Comput. Math. 16(2), 89–113 (2017)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, High phase-lag order, four-step methods for solving \(y^{\prime \prime }=f(x, y)\). Appl. Comput. Math. 17(3), 307–316 (2018)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    A.A. Kosti, Z.A. Anastassi, T.E. Simos, Construction of an optimized explicit Runge–Kutta–Nyström method for the numerical solution of oscillatory initial value problems. Comput. Math. Appl. 61(11), 3381–3390 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Z. Kalogiratou, Th Monovasilis, T.E. Simos, New modified Runge–Kutta–Nystrom methods for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 60(6), 1639–1647 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Z. Th Monovasilis, T.E.Simos Kalogiratou, A family of trigonometrically fitted partitioned Runge–Kutta symplectic methods. Appl. Math. Comput. 209(1), 91–96 (2009)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    T. Monovasilis, Z. Kalogiratou, T.E. Simos, Construction of exponentially fitted symplectic Runge–Kutta–Nyström methods from partitioned Runge–Kutta methods. Mediterr. J. Math. 13(4), 2271–2285 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    T. Monovasilis, Z. Kalogiratou, H. Ramos, T.E. Simos, Modified two-step hybrid methods for the numerical integration of oscillatory problems. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 40(4), 5286–5294 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    T.E. Simos, Multistage symmetric two-step P-stable method with vanished phase-lag and its first, second and third derivatives. Appl. Comput. Math. 14(3), 296–315 (2015)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Z. Kalogiratou, Th Monovasilis, H. Ramos, T.E. Simos, A new approach on the construction of trigonometrically fitted two step hybrid methods. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 303, 146–155 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    H. Ramos, Z. Kalogiratou, Th Monovasilis, T.E. Simos, An optimized two-step hybrid block method for solving general second order initial-value problems. Numer. Algorithms 72, 1089–1102 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    T.E. Simos, High order closed Newton–Cotes trigonometrically-fitted formulae for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 209(1), 137–151 (2009)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    A. Konguetsof, T.E. Simos, An exponentially-fitted and trigonometrically-fitted method for the numerical solution of periodic initial-value problems. Comput. Math. Appl. 45(1–3), 547–554 (2003). (Article Number: PII S0898-1221(02)00354-1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    T.E. Simos, A new explicit hybrid four-step method with vanished phase-lag and its derivatives. J. Math. Chem. 52(7), 1690–1716 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    M.A. Medvedev, T.E. Simos, A three-stages multistep teeming in phase algorithm for computational problems in chemistry. J. Math. Chem. 57(6), 1598–1617 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    T.E. Simos, On the explicit four-step methods with vanished phase-lag and its first derivative. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 8(2), 447–458 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    G.A. Panopoulos, T.E. Simos, A new optimized symmetric embedded predictor–corrector method (EPCM) for initial-value problems with oscillatory solutions. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 8(2), 703–713 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    G.A. Panopoulos, T.E. Simos, An eight-step semi-embedded predictor-corrector method for orbital problems and related IVPs with oscillatory solutions for which the frequency is unknown. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 290, 1–15 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    F. Hui, T.E. Simos, A new family of two stage symmetric two-step methods with vanished phase-lag and its derivatives for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 53(10), 2191–2213 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    LGr Ixaru, M. Rizea, Comparison of some four-step methods for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 38(3), 329–337 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    LGr Ixaru, M. Micu, Topics in Theoretical Physics (Central Institute of Physics, Bucharest, 1978)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    LGr Ixaru, M. Rizea, A Numerov-like scheme for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation in the deep continuum spectrum of energies. Comput. Phys. Commun. 19, 23–27 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    J.R. Dormand, M.E.A. El-Mikkawy, P.J. Prince, Families of Runge–Kutta–Nyström formulae. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 7, 235–250 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    J.R. Dormand, P.J. Prince, A family of embedded Runge–Kutta formulae. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 6, 19–26 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    G.D. Quinlan, S. Tremaine, Symmetric multistep methods for the numerical integration of planetary orbits. Astron. J. 100, 1694–1700 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    A.D. Raptis, A.C. Allison, Exponential-fitting methods for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 14, 1–5 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    M.M. Chawla, P.S. Rao, An Noumerov-typ method with minimal phase-lag for the integration of second order periodic initial-value problems II explicit method. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 15, 329–337 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    M.M. Chawla, P.S. Rao, An explicit sixth—order method with phase-lag of order eight for \(y^{\prime \prime }=f(t, y)\). J. Comput. Appl. Math. 17, 363–368 (1987)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    T.E. Simos, A new Numerov-type method for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 46, 981–1007 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    A. Konguetsof, Two-step high order hybrid explicit method for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 48, 224–252 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    A.D. Raptis, J.R. Cash, A variable step method for the numerical integration of the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 36, 113–119 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    A.C. Allison, The numerical solution of coupled differential equations arising from the Schrödinger equation. J. Comput. Phys. 6, 378–391 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    R.B. Bernstein, A. Dalgarno, H. Massey, I.C. Percival, Thermal scattering of atoms by homonuclear diatomic molecules. Proc. R. Soc. Ser. A 274, 427–442 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    R.B. Bernstein, Quantum mechanical (phase shift) analysis of differential elastic scattering of molecular beams. J. Chem. Phys. 33, 795–804 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    T.E. Simos, Exponentially fitted Runge–Kutta methods for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation and related problems. Comput. Mater. Sci. 18, 315–332 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    J.R. Dormand, P.J. Prince, A family of embedded Runge–Kutta formula. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 6, 19–26 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    K. Mu, T.E. Simos, A Runge–Kutta type implicit high algebraic order two-step method with vanished phase-lag and its first, second, third and fourth derivatives for the numerical solution of coupled differential equations arising from the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 53, 1239–1256 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    M. Liang, T.E. Simos, A new four stages symmetric two-step method with vanished phase-lag and its first derivative for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 54(5), 1187–1211 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    X. Xi, T.E. Simos, A new high algebraic order four stages symmetric two-step method with vanished phase-lag and its first and second derivatives for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation and related problems. J. Math. Chem. 54(7), 1417–1439 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    F. Hui, T.E. Simos, Hybrid high algebraic order two-step method with vanished phase-lag and its first and second derivatives. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 73, 619–648 (2015)Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Z. Zhou, T.E. Simos, A new two stage symmetric two-step method with vanished phase-lag and its first, second, third and fourth derivatives for the numerical solution of the radial Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 54, 442–465 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Fei Hui, T.E. Simos, Four stages symmetric two-step P-stable method with vanished phase-lag and its first, second, third and fourth derivatives. Appl. Comput. Math. 15(2), 220–238 (2016)Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    W. Zhang, T.E. Simos, A high-order two-step phase-fitted method for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Mediterr. J. Math. 13(6), 5177–5194 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    L. Zhang and T.E. Simos, An efficient numerical method for the solution of the Schrödinger equation. Adv. Math. Phys. 2016, Article ID 8181927, 20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8181927
  104. 104.
    M. Dong, T.E. Simos, A new high algebraic order efficient finite difference method for the solution of the Schrödinger equation. Filomat 31(15), 4999–5012 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    R. Lin, T.E. Simos, A two-step method with vanished phase-lag and its derivatives for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Open Phys. 14, 628–642 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    H. Ning, T.E. Simos, A low computational cost eight algebraic order hybrid method with vanished phase-lag and its first, second, third and fourth derivatives for the approximate solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 53(6), 1295–1312 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Z. Wang, T.E. Simos, An economical eighth-order method for the approximation of the solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 55, 717–733 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    J. Ma, T.E. Simos, An efficient and computational effective method for second order problems. J. Math. Chem. 55, 1649–1668 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    L. Yang, T.E. Simos, An efficient and economical high order method for the numerical approximation of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 55(9), 1755–1778 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, V.M. Golovanov, B.M. Kostishko, T.E. Simos, A four stages numerical pair with optimal phase and stability properties. J. Math. Chem. 56(1), 81–102 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    K. Yan, T.E. Simos, A finite difference pair with improved phase and stability properties. J. Math. Chem. 56(1), 170–192 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    J. Fang, C. Liu, T.E. Simos, A hybric finite difference pair with maximum phase and stability properties. J. Math. Chem. 56(2), 423–448 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    J. Yao, T.E. Simos, New finite difference pair with optimized phase and stability properties. J. Math. Chem. 56(2), 449–476 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    J. Zheng, C. Liu, T.E. Simos, A new two-step finite difference pair with optimal properties. J. Math. Chem. 56(3), 770–798 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    X. Shi, T.E. Simos, New five-stages finite difference pair with optimized phase properties. J. Math. Chem. 56(4), 982–1010 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    C. Liu, T.E. Simos, A five-stages symmetric method with improved phase properties. J. Math. Chem. 56(4), 1313–1338 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    J. Yao, T.E. Simos, New five-stages two-step method with improved characteristics. J. Math. Chem. 56(6), 1567–1594 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    K. Yan, T.E. Simos, New Runge–Kutta type symmetric two-step method with optimized characteristics. J. Math. Chem. 56(8), 2454–2484 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Z. Chen, C. Liu, T.E. Simos, New three-stages symmetric two step method with improved properties for second order initial/boundary value problems. J. Math. Chem. 56(9), 2591–2616 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    R. Hao, T.E. Simos, New Runge-Kutta type symmetric two step finite difference pair with improved properties for second order initial and/or boundary value problems. J. Math. Chem. 56(10), 3014–3044 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    G.-H. Qiu, C. Liu, T.E. Simos, A new multistep method with optimized characteristics for initial and/or boundary value problems. J. Math. Chem. 57(1), 119–148 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Th Monovasilis, Z. Kalogiratou, T.E. Simos, Trigonometrical fitting conditions for two derivative Runge–Kutta methods. Numer. Algorithms 79, 787–800 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    G. Wang, T.E. Simos, New multiple stages two-step complete in phase algorithm with improved characteristics for second order initial/boundary value problems. J. Math. Chem. 57(2), 494–515 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    N. Yang, T.E. Simos, New four stages multistep in phase algorithm with best possible properties for second order problems. J. Math. Chem. 57(3), 895–917 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    F. Hui, T.E. Simos, New multistage two-step complete in phase scheme with improved properties for quantum chemistry problems. J. Math. Chem. 57(4), 1088–1111 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, D.V. Suranov, T.E. Simos, Newmultiple stages scheme with improved properties for second order problems. J. Math. Chem. 57(1), 232–262 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Z. Chen, C. Liu, C.-W. Hsu, T.E. Simos, A new multistage multistep full in phase algorithm with optimized charateristis for problems in chemistry. J. Math. Chem. 57(4), 1112–1139 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, A.A. Bondarenko, T.E. Simos, New hybrid two-step method with optimized phase and stability characteristics. J. Math. Chem. 56(8), 2302–2340 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, T.E. Simos, New hybrid symmetric two step scheme with optimized characteristics for second order problems. J. Math. Chem. 56(9), 2816–2844 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    C.J. Cramer, Essentials of Computational Chemistry (Wiley, Chichester, 2004)Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    F. Jensen, Introduction to Computational Chemistry (Wiley, Chichester, 2007)Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    A.R. Leach, Molecular Modelling—Principles and Applications (Pearson, London, 2001)Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    P. Atkins, R. Friedman, Molecular Quantum Mechanics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011)Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    T.E. Simos, V.N. Kovalnogov, I.V. Shevchuk, Perspective of mathematical modeling and research of targeted formation of disperse phase clusters in working media for the next-generation power engineering technologies. AIP Conf. Proc. 1863, 560099 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, D.A. Generalov, Y.A. Khakhalev, A.N. Zolotov, Numerical research of turbulent boundary layer based on the fractal dimension of pressure fluctuations. AIP Conf. Proc. 738, 480004 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, T.V. Karpukhina, E.V. Tsvetova, Numerical analysis of the temperature stratification of the disperse flow. AIP Conf. Proc. 1648, 850033 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    N. Kovalnogov, E. Nadyseva, O. Shakhov, V. Kovalnogov, Control of turbulent transfer in the boundary layer through applied periodic effects. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii Aviatsionaya Tekhnika 1, 49–53 (1998)Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, D.A. Generalov, Modeling and development of cooling technology of turbine engine blades. Int. Rev. Mech. Eng. 9(4), 331–335 (2015)Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    S. Kottwitz, LaTeX Cookbook (Packt Publishing Ltd., Birmingham, 2015), pp. 231–236Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chang’an universityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, College of SciencesKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Section of Mathematics, Department of Civil EngineeringDemocritus University of ThraceXanthiGreece
  4. 4.AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations