New Runge–Kutta type symmetric twostep method with optimized characteristics
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
 41 Downloads
 3 Citations
Abstract
In this paper and for the first time in the literature, we build a new hybrid symmetric twostep method with the following properties: (1) the new scheme is of symmetric type, (2) the new scheme is of twostep, (3) the new scheme is of fivestages, (4) the new scheme is of twelfthalgebraic order, (5) the new scheme has eliminated the phaselag and its first, second, third, fourth and fifth derivatives, (6) the new scheme has improved stability characteristics for the general problems, (7) the new scheme is Pstable [with interval of periodicity equal to \(\left( 0, \infty \right) \)] and (8) the new scheme builded based on the following approximations: For the new builded scheme we give a full numerical analysis (local truncation error and stability analysis). The efficiency of the new builded scheme is examined with the numerical solution of systems of coupled differential equations of the Schrödinger type.

the first stage is approximation on the point \(x_{n1}\),

the second stage is approximation on the point \(x_{n1}\),

the third stage is approximation on the point \(x_{n1}\),

the fourth stage is approximation on the point \(x_{n}\) and finally,

the fifth stage is approximation on the point \(x_{n+1}\),
Keywords
Phaselag Derivative of the phaselag Initial value problems Oscillating solution Symmetric Hybrid Multistep Schrödinger equationMathematics Subject Classification
65L05Notes
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
10910_2018_899_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (130 kb)
References
 1.Z.A. Anastassi, T.E. Simos, A parametric symmetric linear fourstep method for the efficient integration of the Schrödinger equation and related oscillatory problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236, 3880–3889 (2012)Google Scholar
 2.A.D. Raptis, T.E. Simos, A fourstep phasefitted method for the numerical integration of second order initialvalue problem. BIT 31, 160–168 (1991)Google Scholar
 3.J.M. Franco, M. Palacios, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 30, 1 (1990)Google Scholar
 4.J.D. Lambert, Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Systems, The Initial Value Problem (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Baffins Lane, Chichester, West Sussex, England, 1991), pp. 104–107Google Scholar
 5.E. Stiefel, D.G. Bettis, Stabilization of Cowell’s method. Numer. Math. 13, 154–175 (1969)Google Scholar
 6.G.A. Panopoulos, Z.A. Anastassi, T.E. Simos, Two new optimized eightstep symmetric methods for the efficient solution of the Schrödinger equation and related problems. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 60(3), 773–785 (2008)Google Scholar
 7.G.A. Panopoulos, Z.A. Anastassi, T.E. Simos, Two optimized symmetric eightstep implicit methods for initialvalue problems with oscillating solutions. J. Math. Chem. 46(2), 604–620 (2009)Google Scholar
 8.
 9.T.E. Simos, P.S. Williams, Bessel and Neumann fitted methods for the numerical solution of the radial Schrödinger equation. Comput. Chem. 21, 175–179 (1977)Google Scholar
 10.T.E. Simos, Jesus VigoAguiar, A dissipative exponentiallyfitted method for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation and related problems. Comput. Phys. Commun. 152, 274–294 (2003)Google Scholar
 11.T.E. Simos, G. Psihoyios, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 175, IX (2005)Google Scholar
 12.T. Lyche, Chebyshevian multistep methods for ordinary differential eqations. Num. Math. 19, 65–75 (1972)Google Scholar
 13.T.E. Simos, P.S. Williams, A finite difference method for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 79, 189–205 (1997)Google Scholar
 14.R.M. Thomas, Phase properties of high order almost Pstable formulae. BIT 24, 225–238 (1984)Google Scholar
 15.J.D. Lambert, I.A. Watson, Symmetric multistep methods for periodic initial values problems. J. Inst. Math. Appl. 18, 189–202 (1976)Google Scholar
 16.A. Konguetsof, T.E. Simos, A generator of hybrid symmetric fourstep methods for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 158(1), 93–106 (2003)Google Scholar
 17.Z. Kalogiratou, T. Monovasilis, T.E. Simos, Symplectic integrators for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 158(1), 83–92 (2003)Google Scholar
 18.Z. Kalogiratou, T.E. Simos, Newton–Cotes formulae for longtime integration. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 158(1), 75–82 (2003)Google Scholar
 19.G. Psihoyios, T.E. Simos, Trigonometrically fitted predictor–corrector methods for IVPs with oscillating solutions. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 158(1), 135–144 (2003)Google Scholar
 20.T.E. Simos, I.T. Famelis, C. Tsitouras, Zero dissipative, explicit Numerovtype methods for second order IVPs with oscillating solutions. Numer. Algorithms 34(1), 27–40 (2003)Google Scholar
 21.T.E. Simos, Dissipative trigonometricallyfitted methods for linear secondorder IVPs with oscillating solution. Appl. Math. Lett. 17(5), 601–607 (2004)Google Scholar
 22.K. Tselios, T.E. Simos, Runge–Kutta methods with minimal dispersion and dissipation for problems arising from computational acoustics. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 175(1), 173–181 (2005)Google Scholar
 23.Ch. Tsitouras, T.E. Simos, On ninth order, explicit Numerov type methods with constant coefficients. Mediterr. J. Math., in pressGoogle Scholar
 24.G. Psihoyios, T.E. Simos, A fourth algebraic order trigonometrically fitted predictor–corrector scheme for IVPs with oscillating solutions. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 175(1), 137–147 (2005)Google Scholar
 25.Z.A. Anastassi, T.E. Simos, An optimized Runge–Kutta method for the solution of orbital problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 175(1), 1–9 (2005)Google Scholar
 26.T.E. Simos, Closed Newton–Cotes trigonometricallyfitted formulae of high order for longtime integration of orbital problems. Appl. Math. 22(10), 1616–1621 (2009)Google Scholar
 27.S. Stavroyiannis, T.E. Simos, Optimization as a function of the phaselag order of nonlinear explicit twostep Pstable method for linear periodic IVPs. Appl. Numer. Math. 59(10), 2467–2474 (2009)Google Scholar
 28.T.E. Simos, Exponentially and trigonometrically fitted methods for the solution of the Schrödinger equation. Acta Appl. Math. 110(3), 1331–1352 (2010)Google Scholar
 29.T.E. Simos, New stable closed Newton–Cotes trigonometrically fitted formulae for longtime integration, abstract and applied analysis, Volume 2012, Article ID 182536, 15 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/182536
 30.T.E. Simos, Optimizing a hybrid twostep method for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation and related problems with respect to phaselag. J. Appl. Math. Volume 2012, Article ID 420387, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/420387,2012
 31.Z.A. Anastassi, T.E. Simos, A parametric symmetric linear fourstep method for the efficient integration of the Schrödinger equation and related oscillatory problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236, 3880–3889 (2012)Google Scholar
 32.Ibraheem Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A high algebraic order multistage explicit fourstep method with vanished phaselag and its first, second, third, fourth and fifth derivatives for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 53(8), 1915–1942 (2015)Google Scholar
 33.Ibraheem Alolyan, T.E. Simos, Efficient low computational cost hybrid explicit fourstep method with vanished phaselag and its first, second, third and fourth derivatives for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 53(8), 1808–1834 (2015)Google Scholar
 34.Ibraheem Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A high algebraic order predictor–corrector explicit method with vanished phaselag and its first, second, third and fourth derivatives for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation and related problems. J. Math. Chem. 53(7), 1495–1522 (2015)Google Scholar
 35.Ibraheem Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A family of explicit linear sixstep methods with vanished phaselag and its first derivative. J. Math. Chem. 52(8), 2087–2118 (2014)Google Scholar
 36.T.E. Simos, An explicit fourstep method with vanished phaselag and its first and second derivatives. J. Math. Chem. 52(3), 833–855 (2014)Google Scholar
 37.Ibraheem Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A Runge–Kutta type fourstep method with vanished phaselag and its first and second derivatives for each level for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Chem. 52(3), 917–947 (2014)Google Scholar
 38.Ibraheem Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A predictor–corrector explicit fourstep method with vanished phaselag and its first, second and third derivatives for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation 53(2), 685–717 (2015)Google Scholar
 39.Ibraheem Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A hybrid type fourstep method with vanished phaselag and its first, second and third derivatives for each level for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Chem. 52(9), 2334–2379 (2014)Google Scholar
 40.G.A. Panopoulos, T.E. Simos, A new optimized symmetric 8step semiembedded predictor–corrector method for the numerical solution of the radial Schrödinger equation and related orbital problems. J. Math. Chem. 51(7), 1914–1937 (2013)Google Scholar
 41.T.E. Simos, New high order multiderivative explicit fourstep methods with vanished phaselag and its derivatives for the approximate solution of the Schrödinger equation. Part I: construction and theoretical analysis. J. Math. Chem. 51(1), 194–226 (2013)Google Scholar
 42.T.E. Simos, High order closed Newton–Cotes exponentially and trigonometrically fitted formulae as multilayer symplectic integrators and their application to the radial Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 50(5), 1224–1261 (2012)Google Scholar
 43.Dimitris F. Papadopoulos, T.E. Simos, A modified Runge–Kutta–Nyström method by using phase lag properties for the numerical solution of orbital problems. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 7(2), 433–437 (2013)Google Scholar
 44.Th Monovasilis, Z. Kalogiratou, T.E. Simos, Exponentially fitted symplectic Runge–Kutta–Nyström methods. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 7(1), 81–85 (2013)Google Scholar
 45.G.A. Panopoulos, T.E. Simos, An optimized symmetric 8step semiembedded predictor–corrector method for IVPs with oscillating solutions. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 7(1), 73–80 (2013)Google Scholar
 46.D.F. Papadopoulos, T.E Simos, The use of phase lag and amplification error derivatives for the construction of a modified Runge–Kutta–Nyström method, Abstract and Applied Analysis Article Number: 910624 Published: 2013Google Scholar
 47.I. Alolyan, Z.A. Anastassi, T.E. Simos, A new family of symmetric linear fourstep methods for the efficient integration of the Schrödinger equation and related oscillatory problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 218(9), 5370–5382 (2012)Google Scholar
 48.Ibraheem Alolyan, T.E. Simos, A family of highorder multistep methods with vanished phaselag and its derivatives for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 62(10), 3756–3774 (2011)Google Scholar
 49.Ch. Tsitouras, ITh Famelis, T.E. Simos, On modified Runge–Kutta trees and methods. Comput. Math. Appl. 62(4), 2101–2111 (2011)Google Scholar
 50.Ch. Tsitouras, ITh Famelis, T.E. Simos, Phasefitted Runge–Kutta pairs of orders 8(7), J. Comput. Appl. Math. 321, 226–231 (2017)Google Scholar
 51.T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, Evolutionary generation of high order. Explicit two step methods for second order linear IVPs. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 40, 6276–6284 (2017)Google Scholar
 52.T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, A new family of 7 stages, eighthorder explicit Numerovtype methods. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 40, 7867–7878 (2017)Google Scholar
 53.D.B. Berg, T.E. Simos, C.H. Tsitouras, Trigonometric fitted, eighthorder explicit Numerovtype methods. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41, 1845–1854 (2018)Google Scholar
 54.T.E. Simos, Ch. Tsitouras, ITh Famelis, Explicit Numerov type methods with constant coefficients: a review. Appl. Comput. Math. 16(2), 89–113 (2017)Google Scholar
 55.A.A. Kosti, Z.A. Anastassi, T.E. Simos, Construction of an optimized explicit Runge–KuttaNyström method for the numerical solution of oscillatory initial value problems. Comput. Math. Appl. 61(11), 3381–3390 (2011)Google Scholar
 56.Z. Kalogiratou, Th Monovasilis, T.E. Simos, New modified Runge–Kutta–Nystrom methods for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 60(6), 1639–1647 (2010)Google Scholar
 57.Th Monovasilis, Z. Kalogiratou, T.E. Simos, A family of trigonometrically fitted partitioned Runge–Kutta symplectic methods. Appl. Math. Comput. 209(1), 91–96 (2009)Google Scholar
 58.T. Monovasilis, Z. Kalogiratou, T.E. Simos, Construction of exponentially fitted symplectic Runge–KuttaNyström methods from partitioned Runge–Kutta methods. Mediterr. J. Math. 13(4), 2271–2285 (2016)Google Scholar
 59.T. Monovasilis, Z. Kalogiratou, Higinio Ramos, T.E. Simos, Modified twostep hybrid methods for the numerical integration of oscillatory problems. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 40(4), 5286–5294 (2017)Google Scholar
 60.Thedore E. SIMOS, Multistage symmetric twostep pstable method with vanished phaselag and its first, second and third derivatives. Appl. Comput. Math. 14(3), 296–315 (2015)Google Scholar
 61.Z. Kalogiratou, T. Monovasilis, Higinio Ramos, T.E. Simos, A new approach on the construction of trigonometrically fitted two step hybrid methods. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 303, 146–155 (2016)Google Scholar
 62.Higinio Ramos, Z. Kalogiratou, Th Monovasilis, T.E. Simos, An optimized twostep hybrid block method for solving general second order initialvalue problems. Numer. Algorithms 72, 1089–1102 (2016)Google Scholar
 63.T.H. Monovasilis, Z. Kalogiratou, T.E. Simos, Trigonometrical fitting conditions for two derivative Runge–Kutta methods. Numer. Algorithms in press—online firstGoogle Scholar
 64.T.E. Simos, High order closed Newton–Cotes trigonometricallyfitted formulae for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 209(1), 137–151 (2009)Google Scholar
 65.A. Konguetsof, T.E. Simos, An exponentiallyfitted and trigonometricallyfitted method for the numerical solution of periodic initialvalue problems. Comput. Math. Appl. 45(1–3), 547–554 (2003). Article Number: PII S08981221(02)003541Google Scholar
 66.T.E. Simos, A new explicit hybrid fourstep method with vanished phaselag and its derivatives. J. Math. Chem. 52(7), 1690–1716 (2014)Google Scholar
 67.T.E. Simos, On the explicit fourstep methods with vanished phaselag and its first derivative. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 8(2), 447–458 (2014)Google Scholar
 68.G.A. Panopoulos, T.E. Simos, A new optimized symmetric embedded predictor–corrector method (EPCM) for initialvalue problems with oscillatory solutions. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 8(2), 703–713 (2014)Google Scholar
 69.G.A. Panopoulos, T.E. Simos, An eightstep semiembedded predictorcorrector method for orbital problems and related IVPs with oscillatory solutions for which the frequency is unknown. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 290, 1–15 (2015)Google Scholar
 70.Fei Hui, T.E. Simos, A new family of two stage symmetric twostep methods with vanished phaselag and its derivatives for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 53(10), 2191–2213 (2015)Google Scholar
 71.L.Gr Ixaru, M. Rizea, Comparison of some fourstep methods for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 38(3), 329–337 (1985)Google Scholar
 72.L. Gr, Ixaru, M. Micu, Topics in Theoretical Physics, Central Institute of Physics, Bucharest (1978)Google Scholar
 73.L.Gr Ixaru, M. Rizea, A Numerovlike scheme for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation in the deep continuum spectrum of energies. Comput. Phys. Commun. 19, 23–27 (1980)Google Scholar
 74.J.R. Dormand, M.E.A. ElMikkawy, P.J. Prince, Families of Runge–KuttaNyström formulae. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 7, 235–250 (1987)Google Scholar
 75.J.R. Dormand, P.J. Prince, A family of embedded Runge–Kutta formulae. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 6, 19–26 (1980)Google Scholar
 76.G.D. Quinlan, S. Tremaine, Symmetric multistep methods for the numerical integration of planetary orbits. Astron. J. 100, 1694–1700 (1990)Google Scholar
 77.A.D. Raptis, A.C. Allison, Exponentialfitting methods for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 14, 1–5 (1978)Google Scholar
 78.M.M. Chawla, P.S. Rao, An Noumerovtype method with minimal phaselag for the integration of second order periodic initialvalue problems II explicit method. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 15, 329–337 (1986)Google Scholar
 79.M.M. Chawla, P.S. Rao, An explicit sixthorder method with phaselag of order eight for \(y^{\prime \prime }=f(t, y)\). J. Comput. Appl. Math. 17, 363–368 (1987)Google Scholar
 80.T.E. Simos, A new Numerovtype method for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 46, 981–1007 (2009)Google Scholar
 81.A. Konguetsof, Twostep high order hybrid explicit method for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 48, 224–252 (2010)Google Scholar
 82.A.D. Raptis, J.R. Cash, A variable step method for the numerical integration of the onedimensional Schrödinger equation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 36, 113–119 (1985)Google Scholar
 83.A.C. Allison, The numerical solution of coupled differential equations arising from the Schrödinger equation. J. Comput. Phys. 6, 378–391 (1970)Google Scholar
 84.R.B. Bernstein, A. Dalgarno, H. Massey, I.C. Percival, Thermal scattering of atoms by homonuclear diatomic molecules. Proc. R. Soc. Ser. A 274, 427–442 (1963)Google Scholar
 85.R.B. Bernstein, Quantum mechanical (phase shift) analysis of differential elastic scattering of molecular beams. J. Chem. Phys. 33, 795–804 (1960)Google Scholar
 86.T.E. Simos, Exponentially fitted Runge–Kutta methods for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation and related problems. Comput. Mater. Sci. 18, 315–332 (2000)Google Scholar
 87.J.R. Dormand, P.J. Prince, A family of embedded Runge–Kutta formula. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 6, 19–26 (1980)Google Scholar
 88.Mu Kenan, T.E. Simos, A Runge–Kutta type implicit high algebraic order twostep method with vanished phaselag and its first, second, third and fourth derivatives for the numerical solution of coupled differential equations arising from the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 53, 1239–1256 (2015)Google Scholar
 89.Minjian Liang, T.E. Simos, A new four stages symmetric twostep method with vanished phaselag and its first derivative for the numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 54(5), 1187–1211 (2016)Google Scholar
 90.Xiaopeng Xi, T.E. Simos, A new high algebraic order four stages symmetric twostep method with vanished phaselag and its first and second derivatives for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation and related problems. J. Math. Chem. 54(7), 1417–1439 (2016)Google Scholar
 91.F. Hui, T.E. Simos, Hybrid high algebraic order twostep method with vanished phaselag and its first and second derivatives. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 73, 619–648 (2015)Google Scholar
 92.Zhou Zhou, T.E. Simos, A new two stage symmetric twostep method with vanished phaselag and its first, second, third and fourth derivatives for the numerical solution of the radial Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 54, 442–465 (2016)Google Scholar
 93.Fei Hui, Theodore E. Simos, Four stages symmetric twostep Pstable method with vanished phaselag and its first, second, third and fourth derivatives. Appl. Comput. Math. 15(2), 220–238 (2016)Google Scholar
 94.Wei Zhang, T.E. Simos, A highorder twostep phasefitted method for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Mediterr. J. Math. 13(6), 5177–5194 (2016)Google Scholar
 95.L. Zhang, T.E. Simos, An efficient numerical method for the solution of the Schrödinger equation. Adv. Math. Phys. 2016 Article ID 8181927, 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8181927
 96.Ming DONG, Theodore E. Simos, A new high algebraic order efficient finite difference method for the solution of the Schrödinger equation. Filomat 31(15), 4999–5012 (2017)Google Scholar
 97.Rongan LIN, Theodore E. Simos, A twostep method with vanished phaselag and its derivatives for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Open Phys. 14, 628–642 (2016)Google Scholar
 98.Hang Ning, T.E. Simos, A low computational cost eight algebraic order hybrid method with vanished phaselag and its first, second, third and fourth derivatives for the approximate solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 53(6), 1295–1312 (2015)Google Scholar
 99.Zhiwei Wang, T.E. Simos, An economical eighthorder method for the approximation of the solution of the Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 55, 717–733 (2017)Google Scholar
 100.Jing Ma, T.E. Simos, An efficient and computational effective method for second order problems. J. Math. Chem. 55, 1649–1668 (2017)Google Scholar
 101.Vladislav N. Kovalnogov, Ruslan V. Fedorov, Viktor M. Golovanov, Boris M. Kostishko, T.E. Simos, A four stages numerical pair with optimal phase and stability properties. J. Math. Chem. 56(1), 81–102 (2018)Google Scholar
 102.Ke Yan, T.E. Simos, A finite difference pair with improved phase and stability properties. J. Math. Chem. 56(1), 170–192 (2018)Google Scholar
 103.F.A.N.G. Jie, Chenglian Liu, T.E. Simos, A hybric finite difference pair with maximum phase and stability properties. J. Math. Chem. 56(2), 423–448 (2018)Google Scholar
 104.Junfeng Yao, T.E. Simos, New finite difference pair with optimized phase and stability properties. J. Math. Chem. 56(2), 449–476 (2018)Google Scholar
 105.Jinbin Zheng, Chenglian Liu, T.E. Simos, A new twostep finite difference pair with optimal properties. J. Math. Chem. 56(3), 770–798 (2018)Google Scholar
 106.X. Shi, T.E. Simos New fivestages finite difference pair with optimized phase properties. J. Math. Chem., in press—online firstGoogle Scholar
 107.C. Liu, T.E. Simos, A fivestages symmetric method with improved phase properties. J. Math. Chem., in press—online firstGoogle Scholar
 108.J. Yao, T.E. Simos, New fivestages twostep method with improved characteristics. J. Math. Chem., to appearGoogle Scholar
 109.V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, A.A. Bondarenko, T.E. Simos, New hybrid twostep method with optimized phase and stability characteristics. J. Math. Chem., in pressGoogle Scholar
 110.C.J. Cramer, Essentials of Computational Chemistry (Wiley, Chichester, 2004)Google Scholar
 111.F. Jensen, Introduction to Computational Chemistry (Wiley, Chichester, 2007)Google Scholar
 112.A.R. Leach, Molecular Modelling—Principles and Applications (Pearson, Essex, 2001)Google Scholar
 113.P. Atkins, R. Friedman, Molecular Quantum Mechanics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011)Google Scholar
 114.T.E. Simos, V.N. Kovalnogov, I.V. Shevchuk, Perspective of mathematical modeling and research of targeted formation of disperse phase clusters in working media for the nextgeneration power engineering technologies, in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1863 (2017), p. 560099Google Scholar
 115.V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, M.S. Boyarkin, Method of calculation of a thermolysis and friction of a turbulent disperse flow in nozzles, in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1863 (2017), p. 560015Google Scholar
 116.V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, L.V. Khakhaleva, A.V. Chukalin, A.A. Bondarenko, E.N. Kovrizhnykh, The mechanism and theoretical basis of the management of intensity of the heat transfer control through periodic influences on the turbulent boundary layer, in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1863 (2017), p. 560016Google Scholar
 117.V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, L.V. Khakhaleva, A.N. Zolotov, The modeling of influence of the external turbulence over the heat transfer towards the surface of turbomachinery blades, in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1863 (2017), p. 560017Google Scholar
 118.V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, Y.A. Khakhalev, L.V. Khakhaleva, A.V. Chukalin, Application of the results of experimental and numerical turbulent flow researches based on pressure pulsations analysis, in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1863 (2017), p. 560018Google Scholar
 119.V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, L.V. Khakhaleva, D.A. Generalov, A.V. Chukalin, Development and investigation of the technologies involving thermal protection of surfaces immersed in disperse working medium flow. Int. J. Energy Clean Environ. 17(2–4), 223–239 (2016)Google Scholar
 120.V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, Numerical analysis of the efficiency of film cooling of surface streamlined by supersonic disperse flow, in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1648 (2015), p. 850031Google Scholar
 121.V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, T.V. Karpukhina, E.V. Tsvetova, Numerical analysis of the temperature stratification of the disperse flow, in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1648 (2015), p. 850033Google Scholar
 122.N. Kovalnogov, E. Nadyseva, O. Shakhov, V. Kovalnogov, Control of turbulent transfer in the boundary layer through applied periodic effects. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii Aviatsionaya Tekhnika (1) 49–53 (1998)Google Scholar
 123.N. Kovalnogov, and V. Kovalnogov, Characteristics of numerical integration and conditions of solution stability in the system of differential equations of boundary layer, subjected to the intense influence. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii Aviatsionaya Tekhnika (1) 58–61 (1996)Google Scholar
 124.M.S. Boyarkin, V.N. Kovalnogov, T.V. Karpukhina, R.V. Fedorov, Development and research of the technology of enriching lowgrade solid fuels with recirculating flue gases for boiler plants. Int. J. Energy Clean Environ. 17(2–4), 145–163 (2016)Google Scholar
 125.V.N. Kovalnogov, R.V. Fedorov, D.A. Generalov, Y.A. Khakhalev, A.N. Zolotov, Numerical research of turbulent boundary layer based on the fractal dimension of pressure fluctuations, in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1738 (2016), p. 480004Google Scholar
 126.S. Kottwitz, LaTeX Cookbook, Pages 231–236, Packt Publishing Ltd., Birmingham B3 2PB, UK (2015)Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018