Advertisement

Size Does Not Matter: Same-Sex Sexual Behavior Occurred Regardless of Mandible Size in Male Stag Beetle Aegus chelifer chelifer (Coleoptera: Lucanidae)

  • Nut SongvorawitEmail author
  • Buntika Areekul Butcher
  • Chatchawan Chaisuekul
Article

Abstract

Male Aegus chelifer chelifer stag beetles are normally equipped with long mandibles as a weapon to compete with rival males over females, where fighting or aggressive behavior is generally expected during the encounter between two male stag beetles. However, three main patterns were observed between 164 pairings of male stag beetles. Besides the predominant aggressive or fighting behavior (107 pairings), male stag beetles also exhibited disregarding behavior (29 pairings) and same-sex sexual behavior (28 pairings). For sexual interactions, active males exhibited courting and mating behavior as found in male-female interactions, but the insemination process was unsuccessful. Responses of passive males varied from totally passive to resisting and running away. Visual confusion of short-mandible males for females by active males was not likely to be responsible for the same-sex sexual behavior because the correlation between body size and the sexual behavior or sexual role between male-male pairs was not significant. Rather, sexual recognition via chemicals on the cuticle surface might be responsible for the same-sex sexual behavior.

Keywords

Mating Recognition Male-male interaction Sexual role 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Grants for Development of New Faculty Staff, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund, Chulalongkorn University.

Supplementary material

10905_2019_9733_MOESM1_ESM.mp4 (10.2 mb)
ESM 1 (MP4 10,483 kb)
10905_2019_9733_MOESM2_ESM.mp4 (14.6 mb)
ESM 2 (MP4 14,924 kb)
10905_2019_9733_MOESM3_ESM.mp4 (81.7 mb)
ESM 3 (MP4 83,659 kb)

References

  1. Bailey NW, French N (2012) Same-sex sexual behaviour and mistaken identity in male field crickets, Teleogryllus oceanicus. Anim Behav 84:1031–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey NW, Zuk M (2009) Same-sex sexual behavior and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:439–446PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Briffa M (2008) Decisions during fights in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus: mutual or self assessment of energy, weapons and size? Anim Behav 75:1053–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eberhard WG, Gutierrez EE (1991) Male dimorphisms in beetles and earwigs and the question of developmental constraints. Evolution 45:18–28PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Egge AR, Brandt Y, Swallow JG (2011) Sequential analysis of aggressive interactions in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ek-Amnuay P (2008) Beetles of Thailand. 2 edn. Amarin Printing and Publishing Public, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  7. Ek-Amnuay P (2009) Breeding and Rearing Beetles. Amarin Printing and Publishing Public, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  8. Emlen D (2008) The evolution of animal weapons. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, Systematics and Biodiversity 39:387–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emlen DJ (1997) Alternative reproductive tactics and male-dimorphism in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Field KL, Waite TA (2004) Absence of female conspecifics induces homosexual behaviour in male guppies. Anim Behav 68:1381–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gotoh H, Cornette R, Koshikawa S, Okada Y, Lavine LC, Emlen DJ, Miura T (2011) Juvenile hormone regulates extreme mandible growth in male stag beetles. PLoS One 6:e21139PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gotoh H, Fukaya K, Miura T (2012) Heritability of male mandible length in the stag beetle Cyclommatus metallifer. Entomol Sci 15:430–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goyens J, Dirckx J, Aerts P (2015a) Costly sexual dimorphism in Cyclommatus metallifer stag beetles. Funct Ecol 29:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goyens J, Dirckx J, Aerts P (2015b) Stag beetle battle behavior and its associated anatomical adaptations. J Insect Behav 28:227–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvey DJ, Hawes CJ, Gange AC, Finch P, Chesmore D, Farr I (2011) Development of non-invasive monitoring methods for larvae and adults of the stag beetle, Lucanus cervus. Insect Conserv Diver 4:4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoem SA, Melis C, Linnell JD, Andersen R (2007) Fighting behaviour in territorial male roe deer Capreolus capreolus: the effects of antler size and residence. Eur J Wildl Res 53:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hongo Y, Okamoto K (2013) Interspecific contests between males of two Japanese stag beetle species, Lucanus maculifemoratus and Prosopocoilus inclinatus: what overcomes a body size disadvantage? Behaviour 150:39–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iguchi Y (1996) Sexual behavior of the horned beetle, Allomyrina dichotoma septentrionalis (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Jpn J Entomol 64:870–875Google Scholar
  19. Inoue A, Hasegawa E (2013) Effect of morph types, body size and prior residence on food-site holding by males of the male-dimorphic stag beetle Prosopocoilus inclinatus (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). J Ethol 31:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karino K, Niiyama H, Chiba M (2005) Horn length is the determining factor in the outcomes of escalated fights among male Japanese horned beetles, Allomyrina dichotoma L.(Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). J Insect Behav 18:805–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kijimoto T, Pespeni M, Beckers O, Moczek AP (2013) Beetle horns and horned beetles: emerging models in developmental evolution and ecology. WIREs Dev Biol 2:405–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim SI, Farrell BD (2015) Phylogeny of world stag beetles (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) reveals a Gondwanan origin of Darwin’s stag beetle. Mol Phylogenet Evol 86:35–48PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Lahav S, Soroker V, Hefetz A, Vander Meer RK (1999) Direct behavioral evidence for hydrocarbons as ant recognition discriminators. Naturwissenschaften 86:246–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levan KE, Fedina TY, Lewis SM (2009) Testing multiple hypotheses for the maintenance of male homosexual copulatory behaviour in flour beetles. J Evol Biol 22:60–70PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. MacFarlane GR, Blomberg SP, Vasey PL (2010) Homosexual behaviour in birds: frequency of expression is related to parental care disparity between the sexes. Anim Behav 80:375–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCullough EL, Tobalske BW, Emlen DJ (2014) Structural adaptations to diverse fighting styles in sexually selected weapons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:14484–14488PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McRobert SP, Tompkins L (1988) Two consequences of homosexual courtship performed by Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila affinis males. Evolution 42:1093–1097PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Mizunuma T, Nagai S (1994) Sekai no Kuwagatamushi Daizukan: the Lucanid beetles of the world. Mushisha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  29. Moczek AP (2002) Allometric plasticity in a polyphenic beetle. Ecol Entomol 27:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mori H, Chiba S (2009) Sociality improves larval growth in the stag beetle Figulus binodulus (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Eur J Entomol 106:379–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nagamoto J, Aonuma H, Hisada M (2005) Discrimination of conspecific individuals via cuticular pheromones by males of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool Sci 22:1079–1088PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Obata S, Hidaka T (1983) Recognition of opponent and mate in Japanese horned beetle, Allomyrina dichotoma L.(Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Kontyû, Tokyo 51:534–538Google Scholar
  33. Ortiz-Domínguez M, Favila ME, Mendoza-López MR, García-Barradas O, Cruz-Sánchez JS (2006) Epicuticular compounds and sexual recognition in the ball-roller scarab, Canthon cyanellus cyanellus. Entomol Exp Appl 119:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pinratana A, Maes J-M (2003) Lucanidae of Thailand. Sunprinting, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  35. Preston-Mafham K (2006) Post-mounting courtship and the neutralizing of male competitors through “homosexual” mountings in the fly Hydromyza livens F.(Diptera: Scatophagidae). J Nat Hist 40:101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. R Development Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical ComputingGoogle Scholar
  37. Rink M, Sinsch U (2007) Radio-telemetric monitoring of dispersing stag beetles: implications for conservation. J Zool 272:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rohlf FJ (2013) tpsDIG version 2.17. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at stony brook, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Scharf I, Martin OY (2013) Same-sex sexual behavior in insects and arachnids: prevalence, causes, and consequences. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1719–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shiokawa T, Iwahashi O (2000) Mating success of small sized males of Japanese stag beetle Prosopocoilus dissimilis okinawanus Nomura. Jap J Entomol (New Ser) 3:157–165Google Scholar
  41. Singer TL (1998) Roles of hydrocarbons in the recognition systems of insects. Am Zool 38:394–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Siva-Jothy MT (1987) Mate securing tactics and the cost of fighting in the Japanese horned beetle, Allomyrina dichotoma L.(Scarabaeidae). J Ethol 5:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Songvorawit N, Butcher BA, Chaisuekul C (2017) Different allometric intercepts in major Aegus chelifer chelifer stag beetle males from urban and forest habitats. J Asia Pac Entomol 20:835–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Songvorawit N, Butcher BA, Chaisuekul C (2018) Resource holding potential and the outcome of aggressive interactions between paired male Aegus chelifer chelifer (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) stag beetles. J Insect Behav 31:347–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Switzer PV, Forsythe PS, Escajeda K, Kruse KC (2004) Effects of environmental and social conditions on homosexual pairing in the Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica Newman). J Insect Behav 17:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Gossum H, De Bruyn L, Stoks R (2005) Reversible switches between male–male and male–female mating behaviour by male damselflies. Biol Lett 1:268–270PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vasey PL (1995) Homosexual behavior in primates: a review of evidence and theory. Int J Primatol 16:173–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vasey PL, Chapais B, Gauthier C (1998) Mounting interactions between female Japanese macaques: testing the influence of dominance and aggression. Ethology 104:387–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Integrative Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Center of Excellence in Entomology: Bee Biology, Biodiversity of Insects and MitesChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations