Advertisement

Flight Dispersal Capabilities of Female Spotted Lanternflies (Lycorma delicatula) Related to Size and Mating Status

  • Michael S. Wolfin
  • Muhammad Binyameen
  • Yanchen Wang
  • Julie M. Urban
  • Dana C. Roberts
  • Thomas C. BakerEmail author
Article

Abstract

The spotted lanternfly, Lycorma delicatula (White), is an orchard and forest pest native to China. Since its detection in Pennsylvania, USA in 2014, it has spread to other states as well. We conducted experiments to determine the flight capabilities of unmated vs. mated L. delicatula females to assess the relative threat posed by each type with regard to expanding the infestation area through their natural flight behaviors. Females were collected from mating pairs, captured on plants, and netted during flights averaging 24 m, then dissected and examined for male spermatophores, a diagnostic character for determining mating status. The weight, amount of yellow area on the abdomen, wing area, and body length and abdominal width was recorded from these females. Sedentary females on plants were selectively collected for their large and swollen abdomen. They were capable of only flying ~4 m when forcibly launched and were significantly heavier than the in-flight-captured females. More than 93% of these large, sedentary females had mated whereas <5% of the flight-captured females had mated. Spontaneously flying females weighed significantly less, and had significantly smaller and less yellowed abdomens than sedentary plant-captured females. We conclude that nearly all the observed spontaneously flying L. delicatula females were unmated and therefore pose a lower threat to spread the infestation than previously thought. We also hypothesize that these thinner, spontaneously flying females embark on these 10–50-m-long flights because they need to find new trees on which to feed to complete their egg maturation in order to oviposit successfully.

Keywords

Flight dispersal behavior flight capability Invasive species Lycorma delicatula spotted lanternfly spermatophore 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the owners of the residence at Site 1, the proprietors of the commercial fruit farm at Site 2, and the commercial amusement park at Site 3 for allowing us to work on their land. We also thank the Lehigh County Penn State Extension Office for allowing us to work in and store our field equipment in their office space. This research was funded on a grant to TCB through a Cooperative Agreement AP18PPQS&T00C198 between USDA-APHIS-PPQ and The Pennsylvania State University. Support for this project was also provided by McIntire-Stennis funds from the Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences to TCB.

Supplementary material

10905_2019_9724_Fig9_ESM.png (471 kb)
Fig. S1

Mean wing area (mm2) (± S.E.) of one forewing of each of the Lycorma delicatula females that had either been captured in flight (Good Flyers), collected from trees or grapevines (Poor Flyers), or collected while in copula on Ailanthus altissima or grapes (Mating Pairs). Mean wing areas having no lower case letters in common are statistically different according to Tukey’s HSD test (P < 0.05). N = 10 for each plant-to-plant flight group of Good Flyers except Apple to Ailanthus (N = 30) and Grape to Apple (N = 37), and N = 6, 9, and 8 for the Grape, Maple and Ailanthus Poor Flyers, respectively. Total means of female wing areas having no Greek letters in common are statistically different according to Tukey’s HSD test (P < 0.05). N = 107, 8, and 23 for the Good Flyers, Mating Pairs and Poor Flyers, respectively (PNG 470 kb)

10905_2019_9724_MOESM1_ESM.eps (3.3 mb)
High resolution image (EPS 3343 kb)
10905_2019_9724_Fig10_ESM.png (346 kb)
Fig. S2

Mean lengths (mm) (± S.E.) of the abdomens of Lycorma delicatula females that were either captured in flight (Good Flyers), collected from trees or grapevines (Poor Flyers), or collected while in copula on Ailanthus altissima or grapes (Mating Pairs). Mean abdomen lengths having no lower case letters in common are statistically different according to Tukey’s HSD test (P < 0.05). N = 10 for each plant-to-plant flight group of Good Flyers except Apple to Ailanthus (N = 30) and Grape to Apple (N = 37), and N = 6, 9, and 8 for the Grape, Maple and Ailanthus Poor Flyers, respectively. Total means of female abdominal lengths having no Greek letters in common are statistically different according to Tukey’s HSD test (P < 0.05). N = 107, 8, and 23 for the Good Flyers, Mating Pairs and Poor Flyers, respectively (PNG 346 kb)

10905_2019_9724_MOESM2_ESM.eps (1.7 mb)
High resolution image (EPS 1706 kb)
10905_2019_9724_Fig11_ESM.png (289 kb)
Fig. S3

Mean abdominal widths (mm) (± S.E.) of Lycorma delicatula females that were either captured in flight (Good Flyers), collected from trees or grapevines (Poor Flyers), or collected while in copula on Ailanthus altissima or grapes (Mating Pairs). Mean female abdominal widths having no lower case letters in common are statistically different according to Tukey’s HSD test (P < 0.05; N = 10 for each flight group except Apple to Ailanthus [N = 30] and Grape to Apple [N = 37]). N = 10 for each plant-to-plant flight group of Good Flyers except Apple to Ailanthus (N = 30) and Grape to Apple (N = 37), and N = 6, 9, and 8 for the Grape, Maple and Ailanthus Poor Flyers, respectively. Total means of female abdominal widths having no Greek letters in common are statistically different according to Tukey’s HSD test (P < 0.05). N = 107, 8, and 23 for the Good Flyers, Mating Pairs and Poor Flyers, respectively (PNG 288 kb)

10905_2019_9724_MOESM3_ESM.eps (1.7 mb)
High resolution image (EPS 1714 kb)

References

  1. Baines CB, McCauley SJ, Rowe L (2015) Dispersal depends on body condition and predation risk in the semi-aquatic insect, Notonecta undulata. Ecol Evol 5:2307–2316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker TC, Smyers EC, Urban JM, Meng Z, Pagadala Damadaram KJ, Myrick AJ, Cooperband MF, Domingue MJ (2019) Progression of seasonal activities of adults of the spotted lanternfly, Lycorma delicatula, during the 2017 season of mass flight dispersal behavior in eastern Pennsylvania. J Asia-Pacific Entomol 22:705–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barringer LE, Donovall LR, Spichiger SE, Lynch D, Henry D (2015) The first new world record of Lycorma delicatula (Insecta: Hemiptera: Fulgoridae). Entomol News 125:20–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dara SK, Barringer L, Arthurs SP (2015) Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae): a new invasive pest in the United States. J Integr Pest Manag 6:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Domingue MJ, Baker TC (2019) Orientation of flight for physically disturbed spotted lanternflies, Lycorma delicatula, (Hemiptera, Fulgoridae). J Asia Pac Entomol 22:117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kennedy JS (1951) The migration of the desert locust, (Schistocerca gregaria). I. the behavior of swarms. II. A theory of long-range migrations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 235:163–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Myrick AJ, Baker TC (2019) Analysis of anemotactic flight tendencies of the spotted lanternfly (Lycorma delicatula) during the 2017 mass dispersal flights in Pennsylvania. J Insect Behav 32:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael S. Wolfin
    • 1
  • Muhammad Binyameen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yanchen Wang
    • 1
    • 4
  • Julie M. Urban
    • 1
  • Dana C. Roberts
    • 1
  • Thomas C. Baker
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Chemical Ecology Laboratory, Department of EntomologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences & TechnologyBahauddin Zakariya UniversityMultanPakistan
  3. 3.Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, EXTEMIT-KCzech University of Life SciencesSuchdolCzech Republic
  4. 4.School of ForestryNortheast Forestry UniversityHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations