Behavioral Response of Little Fire Ant, Wasmannia auropunctata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), to Trail Chemicals Laid on Epiphytic Moss
The little fire ant (LFA), Wasmannia auropunctata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), is native to the neotropics, but has become one of the world’s most widespread and destructive invasive ants. In Hawaii, LFA was first discovered in 1999 on the Big Island and since then has rapidly spread to neighboring islands, causing ecological and economic damage. LFA can develop fully functional nests on the ground and arboreally, and their foraging and retrieval of food resources is facilitated by a well-developed recruitment system. LFA were found to form recruitment trails on epiphytic moss growing on macadamia nut trees. As a first step to identify LFA recruitment pheromone components, we tested the LFA worker trail-following response to naturally marked epiphytic moss trails. Significantly more LFA workers placed on a natural trail followed the trail and made 90° turns to continue following the trail compared to when they were placed on a fake trail that had no trail marking substance(s). In laboratory choice assays using hexane extracts of moss with and without LFA trail, LFA workers preferred to follow a trail drawn with a hexane extract of moss that had a recruitment trail over a trail drawn with a hexane extract of moss only. Our results confirm that LFA workers readily follow a trail marking substance(s) laid down on epiphytic moss.
KeywordsRecruitment pheromone trail pheromone bait little fire ant
We thank two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments and David Oi for consultation on initial LFA colony establishment and maintenance.
- Banks WA, Lofgren CS, Jouvenaz DP, Stringer CE, Bishop PM, Williams DF, Wojcik PD, Glancey BM (1981) Techniques for collecting, rearing, and handling imported fire ants. US Dept Agric Tech AAT-S-21, p 9Google Scholar
- Cerdá X, van Oudenhove L, Bernstein C, Boulay RR (2014) A list of and some comments about the trail pheromones of ants. Nat Product Comm 9:1115–1122Google Scholar
- Lofgren CS (1986) The search for chemical bait toxicants. In: Lofgren CS, Vander Meer RK (eds) Fire ants and leaf cutting ants: biology and management. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 369–377Google Scholar
- SAS Institute (2009) SAS/STAT 9.2 User’s Guide, Second Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USAGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka Y, Nishisue K, Sunamura E, Suzuki S, Sakamoto H, Fukumoto T, Terayama M, Tatsuki S (2009) Trail-following disruption in the invasive argentine ant with a synthetic trail pheromone component (Z)-9-hexadecenal. Sociobiology 54:139–152Google Scholar
- Troyer EJ, Derstine NT, Showalter DN, Jang EB, Siderhurst MS (2009) Field studies of Wasmannia auropunctata alkylpyrazines: towards management applications. Sociobiology 54:955–971Google Scholar
- Vander Meer RK (1996) Pheromone enhanced baits for pest ant control: current status and future prospects. In: Wildey KB (ed) Proceedings of the second international conference on insect pests in the urban environments. International conference on urban pests, 7–10 July 1996, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp 531–539Google Scholar
- Vander Meer RK, Breed MD, Karl EE, Mark LW (1998) Pheromone communication in social insects: ants, wasps, bees, and termites. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
- Wetterer JK, Porter SD (2003) The little fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata: distribution, impact, and control. Sociobiology 42:1–41Google Scholar
- Wilson EO (1962) Chemical communication among workers of the fire ant Solenopsis saevissima (Fr. Smith) 1. The organization of mass-foraging. Anim Behav 10:140–147Google Scholar
- Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar