Skip to main content
Log in

Searching Responses of a Hunting Spider to Cues Associated with Lepidopteran Eggs

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cheiracanthium inclusum (Hentz), a hunting spider, feeds on eggs of Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) and other moths. This study investigated whether C. inclusum can use chemical compounds present in H. zea scales and egg residues as kairomones to find these non-motile prey items. In a series of no- choice tests, spiders were presented with a piece of florist paper containing scales alone, scales + egg residues, or untreated controls. Next, spiders were presented with solvent extracts of either scales or eggs. Polar and non-polar solvents were used in the extractions. Contact with scales alone, scales + egg residues, and non-polar solvent extracts of both scales and eggs resulted in retention and/or induction of local searching behavior. Extracts made with polar solvents induced no apparent response, indicating that the chemostimulatory compounds are lipophilic. These results show that C. inclusum responds to kairomones left by ovipositing H. zea and use these chemical cues to detect and locate H. zea eggs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan RA, Elgar MA, Capon RJ (1996) Exploitation of an ant chemical alarm signal by the zodariid spider Habronestes bradleyi Walckenaer. Proc Royal Soc London, Series B 263:6–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amalin DM, Peña JE, Duncan RE, Browning HW, and McSorley R (2002) Natural mortality factors acting on citrus leafminer, Phyllocnistis citrella, in lime orchards in south Florida. BioControl 47:327–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark RJ, Jackson RR, Cutler B (2000) Chemical cues from ants influence predatory behavior in Habrocestum pulex, an ant-eating jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae). J Arach 28:309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello MJ, Daane KM (1998) Influence of ground cover on spider populations in a table grape vineyard. Ecol Entomol 23:33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross FR, Jackson RR (2009a) Cross-modality priming of visual and olfactory selective attention by a spider that feeds indirectly on vertebrate blood. J Exp Biol 212:1869–1875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cross FR, Jackson RR (2009b) The attentive spider: search image use by a mosquito-eating predator. Ethology 116:240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross FR, Jackson RR (2009c) Olfaction-based anthrophily in a mosquito-specialist predator. Biol Lett 7:510–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross FR, Jackson RR, Pollard SD (2009) How blood-derived odor influences mate-choice decisions by a mosquito-eating predator. PNAS 106:19416–19419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foelix RF (2011) Biology of Spiders, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 419

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier V, Hagler J, Daane K, Groves R, de Leon J, Costa H, and Henneberry T (2006) Monoclonal antibodies specific to glassy-winged and smoketree sharpshooter egg protein: diagnostic tools for predator gut analysis. Biological Control 37:108–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazit Y, Lewis WL, Tumlinson JH (1995) Arrestment of Telenomus remus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) by a Kairomone Associated with Eggs of Its Host, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biol Control 6:283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoefler CD, Taylor M, Jakob EM (2002) Chemosensory response to prey in Phidippus audax (Araneae, Salticidae) and Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae). J Arach 30:155–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignoffo CM (1965) The nuclear-polyhedrosis virus of Heliothis zea (Boddie) and Heliothis virescens (Fabricius). II. Biology and propagation of diet reared Heliothis. J Invert. Path 7:217–226

  • Institute SAS (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RR, Cross FR (2011) Spider cognition. In: Herberstein ME (ed) Spider behaviour. Flexibility and versatility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 31–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RR, Tarsitano MS (1993) Responses of jumping spiders to motionless prey. Bull British Arach Soc 9:105–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RL, Lewis WJ, Beroza M, Bierl BA, Sparks AN (1973) Host-seeking stimulants (kairomones) for the egg parasite, Trichogramma evanescens. Environ Entomol 2:593–596

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michaud JP (2004) Natural mortality of Asian citrus psyllid (Homoptera: Psyllidae)in central Florida. Biol Control 29:260–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Nentwig W (1986) Non-webbuilding spiders: prey specialists or generalists? Oecologia (Berlin) 69:571–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noldus LPJJ, van Lenteren JC (1985) Kairomones for the egg parasite Trichogramma evanescens produced by two of its hosts, Pieris brassicae L. and Pieris rapae L. J Chem Ecol 11:793–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nyffeler M, Breene RG, Dean DA, Sterling WL (1990) Spiders as predators of arthropod eggs. J Appl Entomol 109:490–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patt JM, Pfannenstiel RS (2008) Odor based recognition of nectar in cursorial spiders. Entomol Exp Appl 127:64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patt JM, Pfannenstiel RS (2009) Characterization of restricted area searching behavior following consumption of prey and non-prey food in a cursorial spider (Araneae: Anyphaenidae). Entomol Exp Appl 132:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck WB, Whitcomb WH (1970) Studies on the biology of a spider, Chiracanthium inclusum (Hentz). Bulletin of the University of Arkansas Agricultural Experimental Station. p 753

  • Persons MH, Rypstra AL (2000) Preference for chemical cues associated with recent prey in the wolf spider Hogna helluo (Araneae: Lycosidae). Ethology 106:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persons MH, Uetz GW (1996) Wolf spiders vary patch residence time in the presence of chemical cues from prey (Araneae, Lycosidae). J Arach 24:76–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfannenstiel RS (2004) Nocturnal predation of lepidopteran eggs in south Texas cotton - 2002. In: Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conferences, National Cotton Council, Memphis TN, pp. 1594–1600

  • Pfannenstiel RS (2005) Nocturnal predation and their impact on lepidopteran eggs in annual crops: What we don’t see does help us! pp. 463–471. In: Proc. 2nd International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods. Davos, Switzerland, 12-16 Sept. 2005, USDA Forest Service, Morgantown, WV, FEHTET-2005-08, p 734

  • Pfannenstiel RS (2008a) Spider predators of lepidopteran eggs in south Texas field crops. Biol Control 46:202–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfannenstiel RS (2008b) Development of the cursorial spider, Cheiracanthium inclusum (Araneae: Miturgidae) on eggs of Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Entomol Sci 43:418–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfannenstiel RS, Yeargan K (2002) Identification and diel activity patterns of predators attacking Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs in soybean and sweetcorn. Environ Entomol 31:232–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Punzo F, Kukoyi O (1997) The effects of prey chemical cues on patch residence time in the wolf spider Trochosa parthenus (Chamberlin) (Lycosidae) and the lynx spider Oxyopes salticus Hentz (Oxyopidae). Bull British Arach Soc 10:323–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruberson JR, Greenstone MH (1998) Predators of budworm/bollworm eggs in cotton: an immunological study. In: Proc., Beltwide Cotton Conf, National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN, pp. 1095–1098

  • Strand MR, Vinson SB (1982) Source and characterization of an egg recognition kairomone of Telenomus heliothidis, a parasitoid of Heliothis virescens. Physiol Entomol 7:83–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strand MR, Vinson SB (1983) Analysis of an egg recognition kairomone of Telenomus heliothidis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) isolation and host function. J Chem Ecol 9:423–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Mamoudou Sétamou (Texas A&M University, Kingsville) for assisting us with the statistical analysis. The manuscript was greatly improved by suggestions provided by W. Meikle, T. Zaviezo and two anonymous reviewers. Funding for this project was provided by the USDA-Agricultural Research Service. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA for its use.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph M. Patt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gallagher, R.I., Patt, J.M. & Pfannenstiel, R.S. Searching Responses of a Hunting Spider to Cues Associated with Lepidopteran Eggs. J Insect Behav 26, 79–88 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-012-9339-3

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-012-9339-3

Keywords

Navigation