Advertisement

Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 957–965 | Cite as

Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in 1.5th Generation, 2nd Generation Immigrant Children, and Foreign Adoptees

  • Tony Xing TanEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Existing theories (e.g., acculturative stress theory) cannot adequately explain why mental disorders in immigrants are less prevalent than in non-immigrants. In this paper, the culture-gene co-evolutionary theory of mental disorders was utilized to generate a novel hypothesis that connection to heritage culture reduces the risk for mental disorders in immigrant children. Four groups of children aged 2–17 years were identified from the 2007 United States National Survey of Children’s Health: 1.5th generation immigrant children (n = 1378), 2nd generation immigrant children (n = 4194), foreign adoptees (n = 270), and non-immigrant children (n = 54,877). The 1.5th generation immigrant children’s connection to their heritage culture is stronger than or similar to the 2nd generation immigrants, while the foreign adoptees have little connection to their birth culture. Controlling for age, sex, family type and SES, the odds for having ADD/ADHD, Conduct Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Depression diagnosis were the lowest for the 1.5th generation immigrant children, followed by the 2nd generation immigrant children and the foreign adoptees. The foreign adoptees and non-adopted children were similar in the odds of having these disorders. Connection to heritage culture might be the underlying mechanism that explained recent immigrants’ lower rates of mental disorders.

Keywords

Foreign adoptees Immigrant children Cross-cultural migration Mental disorder Culture-gene co-evolution 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Tony Tan, as the solo author of this manuscript, declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article is a secondary data analysis on the publically available de-identified dataset of the 2007 National Survey of Child’s Health (NSCH).

References

  1. 1.
    Abu-Rayya H. A comparative study of adaptation problems between immigrant adolescents and national adolescents in Australia. Int J Intercult Relat. 2014;39:196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beiser M, Hou F, Hyman I, Tousignant M. Poverty, family process, and the mental health of immigrant children in Canada. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(2):220–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berry JW. Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Appl Psychol. 1997;46:5–34.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bimmel N, Juffer F, van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. Problem behavior of internationally adopted adolescents: a review and meta-analysis. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2003;11(2):64–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen SH, Hua M, Zhou Q, Tao A, Lee EH, Ly J, et al. Parent–child cultural orientations and child adjustment in Chinese American immigrant families. Dev Psychol. 2014;50(1):189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chiao JY, Blizinsky K. Culture–gene coevolution of individualism–collectivism and the serotonin transporter gene. Proc R Soc B. 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chirkov V. Summary of the criticism and of the potential ways to improve acculturation psychology. Int J Intercult Relat. 2009;33:177–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chun H, Mobley M. The “immigrant paradox” phenomenon: assessing problem behaviors and risk factors among immigrant and native adolescents. J Prim Prev. 2014;35(1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crosnoe R, López Turley RN. K–12 educational outcomes of immigrant youth. Future Child. 2011;21(1):129–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dion KK, Dion KL. Gender and cultural adaption in immigrant families. J Soc Issues. 2001;57(3):511–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galler D, Sher L. The effects of immigration on the mental health of adolescents: Depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, substance abuse, delinquent and suicidal behavior among immigrant youth. In: Sher L, Vilens A, editors. Immigration and mental health: stress, psychiatric disorders and suicide behavior among immigrants and refugees. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers; 2010. p. 87–98.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jabbi M, Korf J, Ormel J, Kema IP, den Boer JA. Investigating the molecular basis of major depressive disorder etiology a functional convergent genetic approach. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008;1148:42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson DE. Adoption and the effect on children’s development. Early Hum Dev. 2002;68:39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kiyohara C, Yoshimasu K. Association between major depressive disorder and a functional polymorphism of the 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) transporter gene: a meta-analysis. Psychiatr Genet.2010;20(2):49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    LaFromboise T, Coleman HL, Gerton J. Psychological impact of biculturalism: evidence and theory. Psychol Bull. 1993;114(3):395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    LeVine RA. Childhood socialization: comparative studies of parenting, learning, and educational change. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, Hong Kong University; 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levitt MJ, Lane JD, Levitt J. Immigration stress, social support, and adjustment in the first post-migration year: an intergenerational analysis. Res Hum Dev. 2005;2(4):159–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Madianos MG. Acculturation and mental disorders among immigrants. In: Sher L, Vilens A, editors. Immigration and mental health: stress, psychiatric disorders and suicidal behaviors among immigrant and refugees. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers; 2010. p. 101–12.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Montazer S, Wheaton B. The impact of generation and country of origin on the mental health of children of immigrants. J Health Soc Behav. 2011;52(1):23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neale MC, Cardon LR. Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press; 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Noskova T, Pivac N, Nedic G, Kazantseva A, Gaysina D, Faskhutdinova G, et al. Ethnic differences in the serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) in several European populations. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008;32:1735–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Hara R, Schröder CM, Mahadevan R, Schatzberg AF, Lindley S, Fox S, et al. Serotonin transporter polymorphism, memory and hippocampal volume in the elderly: association and interaction with cortisol. Mol Psychiatr. 2007;12:544–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Portes A, Rumbaut RG. Legacies: the story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Revollo HW, Qureshi A, Collazos F, Valero S, Casas M. Acculturative stress as a risk factor of depression and anxiety in the Latin American immigrant population. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011;23(1):84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Richerson PJ, Boyd R. Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rogler LH. International migrations: a framework for directing research. Am Psychol. 1994;49(8):701–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sirin SR, Ryce P, Gupta T, Rogers-Sirin L. The role of acculturative stress on mental health symptoms for immigrant adolescents: a longitudinal investigation. Dev Psychol. 2013;49(4):736–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stevens GWJM, Vollbergh WAM. Mental health in immigrant children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008;49(3):276–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Suárez-Orozco C, Rhodes J, Milburn M. Unraveling the immigrant paradox: academic engagement and disengagement among recently arrived immigrant youth. Youth Soc. 2009;41(5):151–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Takeuchi DT, Hong S, Gile K, Alegría M. Developmental contexts and mental disorders among Asian Americans. Res Hum Dev. 2007;4(1–2):49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tan TX. Major depression in China-to-US immigrants and US-born Chinese Americans: testing a hypothesis from culture–gene co-evolutionary theory of mental disorders. J Affect Disord. 2014;167:30–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tiwari SK, Wang J. The epidemiology of mental and substance use-related disorders among white, Chinese, and other Asian populations in Canada. Can J Psychiatry. 2006;51:904–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    United Nations Human Development Report. Overcoming barriers: human mobility and development. Edited by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Verhulst FC, Versluis-den Bieman HJM. Developmental course of problem behaviors in adolescent adoptees. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995;34(2):151–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Way BM, Lieberman MD. Is there a genetic contribution to cultural differences? Collectivism, individualism and genetic markers of social sensitivity. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010;5:203–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Welsh JA, Viana AG, Petrill SA, Mathias MD. Interventions for internationally adopted children and families: a review of the literature. J Child Adolesc Soc Work. 2007;24:285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yoon DP. The importance of ethnic socialization and subjective well-being for Korean-born adopted children. J Ethn Cult Divers Soc Work. 2004;13(2):71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhou M. Segmented assimilation: issues, controversies, and recent research on the new second generation. Int Migr Rev. 1997;31:975–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, College of EducationUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations