Advertisement

How Much Should We Pay for Mental Health Deterioration? The Subjective Monetary Value of Mental Health After the 27F Chilean Earthquake

  • Mauricio SarriasEmail author
  • Benjamin Jara
Research Paper
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

In this article we use the life satisfaction approach to assess the non-pecuniary costs of Mental health impacts after the 2010 Chile earthquake. By linking both subjective well-being valuation literature with studies that describe psychological impacts after natural disasters, we are able to quantify how big a compensation should be to leave individuals as well as they were before the event. Our results suggest that people who experience stress should be compensated by approximately 80–90% of the average monthly income if the shock was strong enough to cause significant damages. These estimates are robust to different empirical specifications, endogeneity, shock intensity measures, and mental health definitions. We estimate that the total costs of mental health deterioration are about 7% of the total reported damages, a significant amount that policymakers should not ignore in post-earthquake reconstruction stages.

Keywords

Mental health Subjective well-being Life satisfaction approach Economic valuation Natural disasters Monetary compensation PTSD 

Notes

References

  1. Abeldaño, R., Fernández, R., Estario, J., & Enders, J. (2013). Distribución espacial de los trastornos de estrés postraumático en Chile a partir del terremoto del 27-f. Revista de Salud Pública, 17(3), 40–46.Google Scholar
  2. Akashah, M., & Marks, S. P. (2006). Accountability for the health consequences of human rights violations: Methodological issues in determining compensation. Health and Human Rights, 9, 256–279.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, D. (1997). The study of natural disasters, 1977–97: Some reflections on a changing field of knowledge. Disasters, 21(4), 284–304.Google Scholar
  4. Ali, M., Farooq, N., Bhatti, M. A., & Kuroiwa, C. (2012). Assessment of prevalence and determinants of posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of earthquake in Pakistan using Davidson Trauma Scale. Journal of Affective Disorders, 136(3), 238–243.Google Scholar
  5. Andrades, M., García, F. E., Calonge, I., & Martínez-Arias, R. (2018). Posttraumatic growth in children and adolescents exposed to the 2010 earthquake in Chile and its relationship with rumination and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 1–13.Google Scholar
  6. Andrades, M., García, F. E., Reyes-Reyes, A., Martínez-Arias, R., & Calonge, I. (2016). Psychometric properties of the posttraumatic growth inventory for children in Chilean population affected by the earthquake of 2010. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 86(6), 686.Google Scholar
  7. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Baryshnikova, N., & Pham, N. (2018). Heterogeneity in the relationship between natural disasters and mental health: A quantile approach. Technical report.Google Scholar
  9. Berlemann, M. (2016). Does hurricane risk affect individual well-being? Empirical evidence on the indirect effects of natural disasters. Ecological Economics, 124, 99–113.Google Scholar
  10. Bilger, M., & Carrieri, V. (2013). Health in the cities: When the neighborhood matters more than income. Journal of Health Economics, 32(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  11. Böckerman, P., Johansson, E., & Saarni, S. I. (2011). Do established health-related quality-of-life measures adequately capture the impact of chronic conditions on subjective well-being? Health Policy, 100(1), 91–95.Google Scholar
  12. Bockstael, N. E., & Freeman, A. M. (2005). Chapter 12 welfare theory and valuation. In K.-G. Mler & J. R. Vincent (Eds.), Valuing environmental changes volume 2 of handbook of environmental economics (pp. 517–570). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  13. Carroll, N., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2009). Quantifying the costs of drought: New evidence from life satisfaction data. Journal of Population Economics, 22(2), 445–461.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (2002). A simple statistical method for measuring how life events affect happiness. international Journal of Epidemiology, 31(6), 1139–1144.Google Scholar
  15. Cova, F., & Rincon, P. (2010). The mental health consecuences of the 27f earthquake and tsunami. Terapia Psicológica, 28(2), 179–185.Google Scholar
  16. Danzer, A. M., & Danzer, N. (2016). The long-run consequences of chernobyl: Evidence on subjective well-being, mental health and welfare. Journal of Public Economics, 135, 47–60.Google Scholar
  17. Davidson, J. R., Book, S., Colket, J., Tupler, L., Roth, S., David, D., et al. (1997). Assessment of a new self-rating scale for post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychological Medicine, 27(1), 153–160.Google Scholar
  18. Davidson, J., Kudler, H., & Smith, R. (1987). Personality in chronic post-traumatic stress disorder: A study of the eysenck inventory. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 1(4), 295–300.Google Scholar
  19. Davidson, J. R., Tharwani, H. M., & Connor, K. M. (2002). Davidson trauma scale (DTS): Normative scores in the general population and effect sizes in placebo-controlled SSRI trials. Depression and Anxiety, 15(2), 75–78.Google Scholar
  20. Ettner, S. L. (1996). New evidence on the relationship between income and health. Journal of Health Economics, 15(1), 67–85.Google Scholar
  21. Figueroa, R. A., González, M., & Torres, R. (2010). Plan de reconstrucción psicológica post terremoto. Revista médica de Chile, 138(7), 920–921.Google Scholar
  22. Freedy, J. R., Kilpatrick, D. G., & Resnick, H. S. (1993). Natural disasters and mental health: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8(5), 49.Google Scholar
  23. Frey, B. S., Luechinger, S., & Stutzer, A. (2009). The life satisfaction approach to valuing public goods: The case of terrorism. Public Choice, 138(3–4), 317–345.Google Scholar
  24. Galea, S., Nandi, A., & Vlahov, D. (2005). The epidemiology of post-traumatic stress disorder after disasters. Epidemiologic Reviews, 27(1), 78–91.Google Scholar
  25. García, F. E., Páez-Rovira, D., Zurtia, G. C., Martel, H. N., & Reyes, A. R. (2014). Religious coping, social support and subjective severity as predictors of posttraumatic growth in people affected by the earthquake in Chile on 27/2/2010. Religions, 5(4), 1132–1145.Google Scholar
  26. Ishino, T., Kamesaka, A., Murai, T., & Ogaki, M. (2012). Effects of the great east Japan earthquake on subjective well-being. Journal of Behavioral Economics and Finance, 5, 269–272.Google Scholar
  27. Jara, B., & Faggian, A. (2018). Chapter 8: Labor market resilience and reorientation in disaster scenarios. In T. Baycan & H. Pinto (Eds.), Resilience, crisis and innovation dynamics, volume 2 of new horizons in regional science (pp. 153–168). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Johansson, P.-O. (1987). The economic theory and measurement of environmental benefits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kalia, M. (2002). Assessing the economic impact of stress [mdash] the modern day hidden epidemic. Metabolism-Clinical and Experimental, 51(6), 49–53.Google Scholar
  30. Kan, K. (2007). Cigarette smoking and self-control. Journal of Health Economics, 26(1), 61–81.Google Scholar
  31. Kessler, R. C. (2000). Posttraumatic stress disorder: The burden to the individual and to society. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 5, 4–12.Google Scholar
  32. Leiva-Bianchi, M. C., & Araneda, A. C. (2013). Validation of the Davidson Trauma Scale in its original and a new shorter version in people exposed to the f-27 earthquake in Chile. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4(1), 21239.Google Scholar
  33. Levinson, A. (2012). Valuing public goods using happiness data: The case of air quality. Journal of Public Economics, 96(9–10), 869–880.Google Scholar
  34. Lindahl, M. (2005). Estimating the effect of income on health and mortality using lottery prizes as an exogenous source of variation in income. Journal of Human Resources, 40(1), 144–168.Google Scholar
  35. Lomnitz, C. (2004). Major earthquakes of Chile: A historical survey, 1535–1960. Seismological Research Letters, 75(3), 368–378.Google Scholar
  36. Luechinger, S. (2009). Valuing air quality using the life satisfaction approach. The Economic Journal, 119(536), 482–515.Google Scholar
  37. Luechinger, S., & Raschky, P. A. (2009). Valuing flood disasters using the life satisfaction approach. Journal of Public Economics, 93(3–4), 620–633.Google Scholar
  38. Mahue-Giangreco, M., Mack, W., Seligson, H., & Bourque, L. B. (2001). Risk factors associated with moderate and serious injuries attributable to the 1994 northridge earthquake, Los Angeles, California. Annals of Epidemiology, 11(5), 347–357.Google Scholar
  39. Naoi, M., Sumita, K., & Seko, M. (2007). Earthquakes and the quality of life in Japan. Journal of Property Research, 24(4), 313–334.Google Scholar
  40. Ohtake, F., & Yamada, K. (2013). Appraising the unhappiness due to the great east Japan earthquake: Evidence from weekly panel data on subjective well-being. Technical report.Google Scholar
  41. Peek-Asa, C., Ramirez, M., Seligson, H., & Shoaf, K. (2003). Seismic, structural, and individual factors associated with earthquake related injury. Injury Prevention, 9(1), 62–66.Google Scholar
  42. Peek-Asa, C., Ramirez, M. R., Shoaf, K., Seligson, H., & Kraus, J. F. (2000). Gis mapping of earthquake-related deaths and hospital admissions from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Annals of Epidemiology, 10(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
  43. Phifer, J. F., Kaniasty, K. Z., & Norris, F. H. (1988). The impact of natural disaster on the health of older adults: A multiwave prospective study. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1, 65–78.Google Scholar
  44. Powdthavee, N. (2008). Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationships. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(4), 1459–1480.Google Scholar
  45. Ramirez, M., & Peek-Asa, C. (2005). Epidemiology of traumatic injuries from earthquakes. Epidemiologic Reviews, 27(1), 47–55.Google Scholar
  46. Rehdanz, K., Welsch, H., Narita, D., & Okubo, T. (2015). Well-being effects of a major natural disaster: The case of Fukushima. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 116, 500–517.Google Scholar
  47. Sav, G. T. (1974). Natural disasters: Some empirical and economic considerations. USA: National Bureau of Standards.Google Scholar
  48. Sayer, N. A., Spoont, M., & Nelson, D. (2004). Veterans seeking disability benefits for post-traumatic stress disorder: Who applies and the self-reported meaning of disability compensation. Social Science and Medicine, 58(11), 2133–2143.Google Scholar
  49. Sekulova, F., Van den Bergh, J., et al. (2016). Floods and happiness: Empirical evidence from Bulgaria. Ecological Economics, 126(C), 51–57.Google Scholar
  50. Shinfuku, N. (1996). Psychological consequences of the Great Hanshin earthquake. Stress Science, 10, 25–30.Google Scholar
  51. Shinfuku, N. (2011). Disaster psychiatry: Lessons learned from the Great Hanshin Awaji earthquake. Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry, 25, 3–12.Google Scholar
  52. Van Praag, B. M., & Baarsma, B. E. (2005). Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: The case of airport noise. The Economic Journal, 115(500), 224–246.Google Scholar
  53. Vitriol, V., Cancino, A., Riquelme, P., & Reyes, I. (2013). Earthquake in Chile: Acute stress and post traumatic stress disorder among women in treatment for severe depression. Revista medica de Chile, 141(3), 338–344.Google Scholar
  54. von Möllendorff, C., & Hirschfeld, J. (2016). Measuring impacts of extreme weather events using the life satisfaction approach. Ecological Economics, 121, 108–116.Google Scholar
  55. Wald, D. J., Worden, B. C., Quitoriano, V., & Pankow, K. L. (2005). Shakemap manual: Technical manual, user’s guide, and software guide. Technical report.Google Scholar
  56. Wald, D. J., Quitoriano, V., Heaton, T. H., & Kanamori, H. (1999). Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California. Earthquake Spectra, 15(3), 557–564.Google Scholar
  57. Welsch, H., & Kühling, J. (2009). Using happiness data for environmental valuation: Issues and applications. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(2), 385–406.Google Scholar
  58. Wooldridge, J. M. (1995). Score diagnostics for linear models estimated by two stage least squares. In Advances in econometrics and quantitative economics: Essays in honor of Professor CR Rao (pp. 66–87).Google Scholar
  59. Worden, C., Gerstenberger, M., Rhoades, D., & Wald, D. (2012). Probabilistic relationships between ground-motion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102(1), 204–221.Google Scholar
  60. Wu, Z., Xu, J., & Sui, Y. (2016). Posttraumatic stress disorder and posttraumatic growth coexistence and the risk factors in Wenchuan earthquake survivors. Psychiatry Research, 237, 49–54.Google Scholar
  61. Yamamura, E. (2012). Natural disasters and their long-term effect on happiness: The case of the great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. Germany: MPRA paper, University Library of Munich.Google Scholar
  62. Zhu, H., Deng, Y., Zhu, R., & He, X. (2016). Fear of nuclear power? Evidence from Fukushima nuclear accident and land markets in China. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 60, 139–154.Google Scholar
  63. Zubizarreta, J. R., Cerdá, M., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (2013). Effect of the 2010 Chilean earthquake on posttraumatic stress reducing sensitivity to unmeasured bias through study design. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 24(1), 79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IDEAR, Department of EconomicsUniversidad Católica del NorteAntofagastaChile

Personalised recommendations