Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 693–707 | Cite as

An Exploration of the Spanish Cultural Term Rasmia: A Combination of Eagerness, Strength, Activeness, Courage, Tenacity and Gracefulness

  • M. Dolores MerinoEmail author
  • Marta Velázquez
  • Tim Lomas
Research Paper

Abstract

Since much of the empirical work within Positive Psychology has taken place in English-speaking Western countries, there is concern that the resulting concepts and theories of well-being reflect a bias towards Western (and more specifically English-influenced) ways of thinking. However, efforts are underway in the field to enhance its intercultural sensitivity, including in relation to studying cross-cultural diversity in emotional experience and understanding. In that respect, the current article focuses on the notion of rasmia, a Spanish term denoting drive and tenacity in achieving a goal. The research aims to explore the beliefs and conceptions that Spanish people have regarding rasmia. An on-line survey of Spanish residents revealed that rasmia was defined as incorporating eagerness, strength, activeness, courage, tenacity and gracefulness. A second study, conducted in order to determine the degree of agreement with this definition, showed an 80% of agreement. The results highlight the value of engaging with non-English concepts like rasmia.

Keywords

Rasmia Energy Eagerness Strength Courage Gracefulness 

Notes

References

  1. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research,1(3), 385–405.  https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, D., & Marecek, J. (2008). Dreaming the American dream: Individualism and positive psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,2, 1767–1780.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00139.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Danziger, K. (2006). Universalism and indigenization in the history of modern psychology. In A. C. Brock (Ed.), Internationalizing the history of psychology (pp. 208–225). New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, D., & Dodd, J. (2002). Qualitative research and the question of rigor. Qualitative Health Research,12(2), 279–289.  https://doi.org/10.1177/104973230201200211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (Eds.). (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,92(6), 1087–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Finlay, F., & Gough, B. (2003). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fletcher, R. (2006). Moorish Spain. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Guardián-Fernández, A. (2010). El paradigma cualitativo en la investigación socio-educativa. Colección: Investigación y Desarrollo. San José. Costa Rica: PrintCenter. Recovered from http://repositorio.inie.ucr.ac.cr/bitstream/123456789/393/1/paradigama%20cualitativo.pdf.
  12. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development,29(2), 75.Google Scholar
  13. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature,466(7302), 29.  https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology,6(4), 307.  https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.6.4.307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ibáñez, J. (1979). Más allá de la sociología: el grupo de discusión: teoría y crítica. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  16. Joshanloo, M. (2014). Eastern conceptualizations of happiness: Fundamental differences with western views. Journal of Happiness Studies,15, 475–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, Y., Lin, Y., Huang, C., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). The construct and measurement of peace of mind. Journal of Happiness Studies,14, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lindseth, A., & Norberg, A. (2004). A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences,18(2), 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lomas, T. (2015). Positive cross-cultural psychology: Exploring similarity and difference in constructions and experiences of wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing,5(4), 60–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lomas, T. (2016). Towards a positive cross-cultural lexicography: Enriching our emotional landscape through 216 ‘untranslatable’ words pertaining to well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology,11(5), 546–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lomas, T. (2017). The spectrum of positive affect: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. International Journal of Wellbeing,7(3), 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v7i3.608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lomas, T. (2018a). Experiential cartography, and the significance of untranslatable words. Theory & Psychology,28(4), 476–495.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318772914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lomas, T. (2018b). The dynamics of spirituality: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.  https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lomas, T. (2018c). The flavours of love: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,48(1), 134–152.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lomas, T. (2018d). The roots of virtue: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9997-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lomas, T. (2018e). The value of ambivalent emotions: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1400143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lu, L. (2008). Culture, self, and subjective well-being: Cultural psychological and social change perspectives. Psychologia,51(4), 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2004). Culture, self and ways to achieve SWB: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies,5, 51–79.Google Scholar
  29. Lucy, J. A. (1996). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Maddi, S. R., & Khoshaba, D. M. (1994). Hardiness and mental health. Journal of Personality Assessment,63(2), 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Merino, M. D., & Privado, J. (2015). Positive psychological functioning. Evidence for a new construct and its measurement. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology,31(1), 45–54.Google Scholar
  32. Neto, F., & Mullet, E. (2014). A prototype analysis of the Portuguese concept of saudade. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,45(4), 660–670.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113518370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scheibe, S., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2007). Toward a developmental psychology of Sehnsucht (life longings): The optimal (utopian) life. Developmental Psychology,43(3), 778–795.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Windle, G. (2011). What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology,21(2), 152–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Dolores Merino
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marta Velázquez
    • 1
  • Tim Lomas
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Social, Work and Differential PsychologyUniversidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de PsicologíaPozuelo De Alarcón, MadridSpain
  2. 2.University of East LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations