Gender Differences and Similarities in Autobiographical Memory for Eudaimonic Happy Events
- 103 Downloads
This study investigates the gender differences and similarities in autobiographical memory for eudaimonic happy events. One hundred and eighty-six adults were asked to write personal narratives of meaningful life experiences that enabled them to develop their best potentials. They also completed questionnaires assessing the memory features of reported experiences, the centrality of such experiences for the individual’s identity, and the participants’ well-being. The analysis of narratives revealed that, overall, male and female participants reported eudaimonic experiences which were quite similar in content. Multivariate analyses were also conducted to assess the impact of gender on narrative and questionnaire measures of memory characteristics. Results showed that gender did not have a significant effect on any of the assessed memory characteristics; that is, there were substantial similarities in how male and female participants narrated and assessed their recollections. Findings are interpreted taking into account the current psychology literature on gender differences and similarities.
KeywordsAutobiographical memory Eudaimonic well-being Event centrality Gender differences and similarities Happiness
Author wish to thank Elisa Andreis, Enrico Briccoli, and Deborah Cotich for their precious help in collecting and entering data. This work was supported by the University of Bergamo under the Grant 60SOTG15.
- Chalabaev, A., Sarrazin, P., Fontayne, P., Boiché, J., & Clément-Guillotin, C. (2013). The influence of sex stereotypes and gender roles on participation and performance in sport and exercise: Review and future directions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- European Institute for Gender Equality. (2015). Gender equality index. Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005–2012. Retrieved May 25, 2017, from https://doi.org/10.2839/763764. http://eige.europa.eu/rdc/eige-publications/gender-equality-index-2015-measuring-gender-equality-european-union-2005-2012-report.
- Galati, D., & Sotgiu, I. (2004). Happiness and positive emotions. Ricerche di Psicologia, Special Issue on Positive Psychology, 27, 41–62.Google Scholar
- Grant, K. E., Lyons, A. L., Finkelstein, J. A. S., Conway, K. M., Reynolds, L. K., O’Koon, J. H., & Waitkoff, G. R. et al. (2004). Gender differences in rates of depressive symptoms among low-income, urban, African American youth: A test of two mediational hypotheses. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 523–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lauriola, M., Zelli, A., Calcaterra, C., Cherubini, D., & Spinelli, D. (2004). Sport gender stereotypes in Italy. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 35, 189–206.Google Scholar
- Niedenthal, P. M., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2006). Psychology of emotion: Interpersonal, experiential, and cognitive approaches. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Reese, E., Haden, C. A., Baker-Ward, L., Bauer, P., Fivush, R., & Ornstein, P. A. (2011). Coherence of personal narratives across the lifespan: A multidimensional model and coding method. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12, 424–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.587854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sotgiu, I. (2013). Psicologia della felicità e dell’infelicità [Psychology of happiness and unhappiness]. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
- Suardi, A., Sotgiu, I., Costa, T., Cauda, F., & Rusconi, M. (2016). The neural correlates of happiness: A review of PET and fMRI studies using autobiographical recall methods. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, 383–392. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0414-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tversky, A., & Griffin, D. (1991). Endowment and contrast in judgments of well-being. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 101–118). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
- Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Agocha, V. B., et al. (2010). The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903435208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—Expanded form. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa.Google Scholar