Relative Income and Pay Satisfaction: Further Evidence on the Role of the Reference Group
- 257 Downloads
Social comparison is an important issue in the context of subjective well-being. Subjective well-being, including satisfaction with pay, is not only affected by individual salary but also by the salaries of members of a reference group. This paper studies the relationship between relative wage and pay satisfaction allowing the choice of reference group to vary across individuals. The paper utilizes a survey on working conditions and quality of working life that contains questions regarding the individual’s choice of reference group for income comparisons. The results indicate that even after controlling for reference group choice, both absolute and relative pay are significantly related to satisfaction with pay. Allowing the reference group to vary improves the overall performance of the model, however. We also present evidence that questions regarding relative pay are good predictors of satisfaction with pay.
KeywordsJob satisfaction Pay satisfaction Reference group Relative wage
This work is supported by the visiting scholar scheme at the Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research. Williams is grateful for support from this program.
- Clark, A. E., Senik, C., & Yamada, K. (2013). The Joneses in Japan: Income comparisons and financial satisfaction. ISER Discussion paper no 866.Google Scholar
- De la Garza, A., Mastrobuoni, G., Sannabe, A. & Katsunori, Y. (2010). The relative utility hypothesis with and without self-reported reference wages (Vol. 159). Carlo Alberto Working Papers.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1997). Social comparison and subjective well-being. In B. P. Buunk, R. Gibbons, & A. Buunk (Eds.), Health, coping and well-being (pp. 329–358). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramowitz (pp. 89–125). New-York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Falk, A. & Knell, M. (2000). Choosing the Joneses: On the endogeneity of reference groups (Vol. 53). Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
- Loscocco, K. A., & Spitze, G. (1991). The organizational context of women’s and men’s pay satisfaction. Social Science Quarterly, 72(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
- Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002.Google Scholar
- Mayraz, G., Wagner, G.G. & Schupp, J. (2009). Life satisfaction and relative income: Perceptions and evidence (Vol. 4390). IZA Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
- McCullagh, P. (1980). Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 42(2), 109–142.Google Scholar
- Nguyen, A.N., Taylor, J. & Bradley, S. (2003). Job autonomy and job satisfaction: New evidence. Working paper Department of Economics Management School Lancaster University.Google Scholar
- Tansel, A., & Gazioglu, S. (2012). Management–employee relations, firm size and job satisfaction. ERC Working Papers in Economics 12/11.Google Scholar