Well-Being and Everyday Ethical Consumption
- 328 Downloads
Consumption is central to many people’s lives and their well-being. Well-being and Quality of Life Indicators are increasingly included in consumption studies, either as outcomes of consumption or as influential factors influencing consumption choices. Marketing and consumption research is frequently interested in understanding consumer choices and has traditionally focused on the evaluative dimension of wellbeing, measuring satisfaction with (aspects of) life. Well-being is multidimensional and exploring additional dimensions broadens understanding of the concept. Using are broad sample of Austrian consumers, this research applies the Satisfaction with Life Scale, Personal Well-being Index, Flourishing Scale and Pleasure Orientation and correlates well-being levels with a newly constructed hierarchy of everyday Ethical Consumption Behavior (eECB). The psychometric soundness of the well-being measures employed, collected in German, and the conceptualization of eECB in Austria is supported. Perceived eudaimonic well-being and eECB are positively related, while the correlation between hedonic well-being and eECB is negative. There is no significant relationship between evaluative well-being scales and eECB. While Universalism as a guiding principle in peoples’ lives positively correlates with eECB, demographic characteristics, except for age, are not important. The study provides support for including multiple well-being measures to increase depth and breadth of understanding in consumption research.
KeywordsWell-being dimensions Consumption Ethical consumption behavior
We would like to thank the independent reviewers and associate editor Dr Tatjana Schnell for their constructive feedback.
- Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Churchill, G. A., & Suprenant, C. (1982). An Investigation Into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(November), 451–504.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Diener, E. (2009). The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (Vol. 37). Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
- Esch, T., Jose, G., Gimpel, C., von Scheidt, C., & Michalsen, A. (2013). Die Flourishing Scale (FS) von Diener et al. liegt jetzt in einer autorisierten deutschen Fassung (FS-D) vor: Einsatz bei einer Mind-Body-medizinischen Fragestellung. Forschende Komplementärmedizin/Research in Complementary Medicine, 20(4), 267-275.Google Scholar
- Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. (1995). Rasch Models, Recent Developments and Applications. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
- Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
- International Wellbeing Group (2013). Personal Wellbeing Index: 5th Edition. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University (http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing-index/index.php)
- Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Rasch, G. (1960/80). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests; With a Foreword and an Afterword by Benjamin D. Wright. Chicago: MESA Press.Google Scholar
- Salzberger, T. (2009). Measurement in marketing research: an alternative framework. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Sirgy, M. J. (2012). The psychology of quality of life: Hedonic Well-Being, Life Satisfaction, and Eudaimonia (2nd edition) Social Indicators Research Series (Vol. 50). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Wilkie, W.L., Moore, E.S. (1999). Marketing’s Contribution to Society. Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue), 198–218.Google Scholar
- Wright, B. (1997). Fundamental measurement for psychology. MESA Research Memorandum 64 (URL: http://www.rasch.org/memo64.htm [accessed October 2017]).