Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 19–34 | Cite as

Variations in Daily Cognitive Affective States as a Function of Variations in Daily Generative Activity

  • Molli R. GrossmanEmail author
  • Diana Wang
  • Tara L. Gruenewald
Research Paper
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

Greater perceived and actual generative, or contributory, engagement predicts more favorable psychosocial and physical well-being with advancing age. Although theoretical formulations of prosocial behavior suggest self-enhancement, social connectedness, and positive emotion pathways might underlie such links, empirical examination of these connections remains limited. These associations were examined using data from the National Study of Daily Experiences (n = 1747) in the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States. Multilevel regression models examined person-level and day-level indicators of three forms of generative activity (volunteering, emotional support, informal help) as predictors of daily self-enhancement, social connectedness, and positive affect states over an 8-day period, controlling for sociodemographic factors. At the daily level, both volunteering and giving informal help were found to be associated with greater feelings of self-enhancement and social connectedness. Though the between-person effects of informal help were not significant, individuals who volunteered more, on average, also experienced greater average feelings of positive affect and social connectedness than those who volunteered less or not at all. In contrast, giving emotional support to others was associated with slightly lower levels of these cognitive–affective correlates on a given day, and on average. Observed daily cognitive–affective correlates of different generative activities suggest potential pathways through which such activities may be linked to well-being over time.

Keywords

Volunteering Psychological well-being Activities, contribution, civic engagement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes on Aging Multidisciplinary Training Grant (T32 AG000037) and the USC Provost’s Graduate Student Fellowship. We would also like to thank the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Successful Midlife Development, which funded the MIDUS Study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adelman, R. D., Tmanova, L. L., Delgado, D., Dion, S., & Lachs, M. S. (2014). Caregiver burden: A clinical review. Jama, 311(10), 1052–1060.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beddington, J., Cooper, C. L., Field, J., Goswami, U., Huppert, F. A., Jenkins, R., et al. (2008). The mental wealth of nations. Nature, 455(7216), 1057–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, K. M., Hoye, R., & Nicholson, M. (2012). Self-esteem, self-efficacy, and social connectedness as mediators of the relationship between volunteering and well-being. Journal of Social Service Research, 38(4), 468–483.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2012.687706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, S. L., Nesse, R. M., Vinokur, A. D., & Smith, D. M. (2003). Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14(4), 320–327.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.14461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlson, M. C., Erickson, K. I., Kramer, A. F., Voss, M. W., Bolea, N., Mielke, M., et al. (2009). Evidence for neurocognitive plasticity in at-risk older adults: The experience corps program. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 64(12), 1275–1282.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glp117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson, M. C., Kuo, J. H., Chuang, Y. F., Varma, V. R., Harris, G., Albert, M. S., et al. (2015). Impact of the Baltimore Experience Corps Trial on cortical and hippocampal volumes. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 11(11), 1340–1348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Depp, C. A., & Jeste, D. V. (2006). Definitions and predictors of successful aging: A comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14(1), 6–20.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JGP.0000192501.03069.bc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dulin, P. L., Gavala, J., Stephens, C., Kostick, M., & McDonald, J. (2012). Volunteering predicts happiness among older Māori and non-Māori in the New Zealand health, work, and retirement longitudinal study. Aging & Mental Health, 16(5), 617–624.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2011.641518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellison, C. G. (1991). Religious involvement and subjective well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32(1), 80–99. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org.libproxy2.usc.edu/stable/2136801.
  10. Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Fried, L. P., Carlson, M. C., Freedman, M. M., Frick, K. D., Glass, T. A., Hill, M. J., et al. (2004). A social model for health promotion for an aging population: Initial evidence on the Experience Corps model. Journal of Urban Health, 81(1), 64–78.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jth094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grand, A., Grosclaude, P., Bocquet, H., Pous, J., & Albarede, J. L. (1988). Predictive value of life events, psychosocial factors and self-rated health on disability in an elderly rural French population. Social Science and Medicine, 27(12), 1337–1342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(88)90198-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green, S. E. (2007). “We’re tired, not sad”: Benefits and burdens of mothering a child with a disability. Social Science and Medicine, 64(1), 150–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenfield, E. A., & Marks, N. F. (2004). Formal volunteering as a protective factor for older adults’ psychological well-being. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59(5), S258–S264.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/59.5.S258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gruenewald, T. L., Karlamangla, A. S., Greendale, G. A., Singer, B. H., & Seeman, T. E. (2007). Feelings of usefulness to others, disability, and mortality in older adults: The MacArthur study of successful aging. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62, P28–P37. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.1.P28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gruenewald, T. L., Karlamangla, A. S., Greendale, G. A., Singer, B. H., & Seeman, T. E. (2009). Increased mortality risk in older adults with persistently low or declining feelings of usefulness to others. Journal of Aging and Health, 21(2), 398–425.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264308329023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gruenewald, T. L., Liao, D. H., & Seeman, T. E. (2012). Contributing to others, contributing to oneself: Perceptions of generativity and health in later life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(6), 660–665.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gruenewald, T. L., Tanner, E. K., Fried, L. P., Carlson, M. C., Xue, Q. L., Parisi, J. M., et al. (2016). The Baltimore experience corps trial: Enhancing generativity via intergenerational activity engagement in later life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71(4), 661–670.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoffman, L. (2015). Longitudinal analysis: Modeling within-person fluctuation and change. Routledge: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  23. Hoffman, L., & Stawski, R. S. (2009). Persons as contexts: Evaluating between-person and within-person effects in longitudinal analysis. Research in Human Development, 6(2–3), 97–120.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600902911189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hong, S. I., & Morrow-Howell, N. (2010). Health outcomes of Experience Corps®: A high-commitment volunteer program. Social Science and Medicine, 71(2), 414–420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huta, V., & Zuroff, D. C. (2007). Examining mediators of the link between generativity and well-being. Journal of Adult Development, 14(1–2), 47–52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-007-9030-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahana, E., Bhatta, T., Lovegreen, L. D., Kahana, B., & Midlarsky, E. (2013). Altruism, helping, and volunteering pathways to well-being in late life. Journal of Aging and Health, 25(1), 159–187.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264312469665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. King, L. A. (2001). The health benefits of writing about life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 798–807.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201277003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirkwood, T., Bond, J., May, C., Mckeith, I., & Teh, M. (2010). Mental capital and wellbeing through life: Future challenges. In C. Cooper, J. Field, U. Goswami, R. Jenkins, & B. Sahakian (Eds.), Mental capital and wellbeing (pp. 3–54). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Kirkwood, T. B., Bond, J., May, C., McKeith, I., & Teh, M. M. (2014). Foresight mental capital and wellbeing project. Wellbeing.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell092.Google Scholar
  30. Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Ricard, M., & Singer, T. (2013). Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(6), 873–879.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang, J., Krause, N. M., & Bennett, J. M. (2001). Social exchange and well-being: Is giving better than receiving? Psychology and Aging, 16(3), 511.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.16.3.511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lum, T. Y., & Lightfoot, E. (2005). The effects of volunteering on the physical and mental health of older people. Research on Aging, 27(1), 31–55.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504271349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lyubomirsky, S., Dickerhoof, R., Boehm, J. K., & Sheldon, K. M. (2011). Becoming happier takes both a will and a proper way: An experimental longitudinal intervention to boost well-being. Emotion, 11(2), 391.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McAdams, D. P., & de St Aubin, E. D. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1003–1015.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McAdams, D. P., de St Aubin, E. D., & Logan, R. L. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 221–230.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moen, P., Dempster-McClain, D., & Williams, R. M., Jr. (1992). Successful aging: A life-course perspective on women’s multiple roles and health. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1612–1638.  https://doi.org/10.1086/229941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J., Rozario, P. A., & Tang, F. (2003). Effects of volunteering on the well-being of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(3), S137–S145.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.3.S137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2003). Volunteering and depression: The role of psychological and social resources in different age groups. Social science and medicine, 56(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00025-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Neill, G., Morrow-Howell, N., & Wilson, S. F. (2011). Volunteering in later life: From disengagement to civic engagement. In R. A. Settersten, Jr., & J. L. Angel (Eds.), Handbook of sociology of aging (pp. 333–350). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Okamoto, K., & Tanaka, Y. (2004). Subjective usefulness and 6-year mortality risks among elderly persons in Japan. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 59B(5), P246–P249.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/59.5.P246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pitkala, K. H., Laakkonen, M. L., Strandberg, T. E., & Tilvis, R. S. (2004). Positive life orientation as a predictor of 10-year outcome in an aged population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57(4), 409–414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.07.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Post, S. G. (2005). Altruism, happiness, and health: It’s good to be good. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12(2), 66–77.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1202_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 419–435.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200266002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging: The MacArthur foundation study. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  45. Schwartz, C. E., Keyl, P. M., Marcum, J. P., & Bode, R. (2009). Helping others shows differential benefits on health and well-being for male and female teens. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 431–448.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9098-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 467–487.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singer, T., & Klimecki, O. M. (2014). Empathy and compassion. Current Biology, 24(18), R875–R878.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Villar, F. (2012). Successful ageing and development: The contribution of generativity in older age. Ageing & Society, 32(07), 1087–1105.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X11000973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222–244.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Davis School of GerontologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.California State UniversityLong BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations