The study examines the attachment to city through housing typologies in an urban context, taking the case of post-socialist Tirana, which was facing the issue of urban identity. The approach of examining attachment to city through housing typology was used because housing is observed to be the predominant morphological stock of the urban fabric, which impacted a quasi-metamorphosis in Tirana’s identity and also because home was found to be the scale of place whose significance was highest from the attachment point of view. The methodology used in the study included sampling, surveying and data processing through SPSS. The sampling of housing typologies was conducted based on their architectural features that had evolved in pre-socialist, socialist and post-socialist periods, within a zone of Tirana called the “Middle Ring”. The questionnaire was administered to 225 inhabitants, namely, 25 dwellers per each of nine housing typologies, while the outputs were processed using SPSS software. Overall, the results showed that most of the interviewed inhabitants were attached to city through their dwellings. Most of the dwellers of seven typologies felt attached to city on different levels, whereas those of two typologies mostly felt unattached; thus, attachment to city is dependent on housing typologies. Predominantly, good location and architectural values of dwellings and slightly less a sense of belonging to a self-described nobility of Tirana were given as reasons for attachment to city. Overall the predictors that influenced the place attachment were found to be dwelling quality and comfort, duration, home ownership and age.
Place attachment Scale of places Housing typologies City Tirana
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors acknowledge that no financial support was received from any institution.
Abitz, J. (2006). Post-socialist city development in Tirana. Dissertation, Roskilde University.Google Scholar
Aliaj, B., Lulo, K., & Myftiu, G. (2003). Tirana: The challenge of urban development. Tirana: Cetis.Google Scholar
Altman, I., & Low, S. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 1–12). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anton, C. E., & Lawrence, C. (2014). Home is where the heart is: The effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation. Journal of Environmental Psychology,40, 451–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckley, T. M. (2003). The relative importance of sociocultural and ecological factors in attachment to place. In: L. E. Kruger (Ed.), Understanding community–forest relations, pp. 105–126. General technical report PNW-GTR-566, U.S. https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr566.pdf.
Bleta, I. (2010). Influences of political regime shifts on the urban scene of a capital city case study: Tirana. Dissertation, METU University.Google Scholar
Brown, B., Perkins, D. D., & Brown, G. (2003). Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology,23, 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushati, V. (2012). Villas of Tirana: First half of 20th century. Tirana: Polis Press.Google Scholar
Casakin, H., Hernández, & B., Ruiz, C. (2015). Place attachment and place identity in Israeli cities: The influence of city size. Cities, 42, 224–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, D. (1996). Contributions of journeys away to the definition of home: An empirical study of a dialectical process. Journal of Environmental Psychology,16, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuba, L., & Hummon, D. M. (1993). A place to call home: Identification with dwelling, community, and region. The Sociological Quarterly,34, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, M. A., & Anderson, D. H. (2005). Getting from sense of place to place-based management: An interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Society and Natural Resources,18, 625–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology,19, 426–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Félonneau, M. L. (2004). Love and loathing of the city: Urbanophilia and urbanophobia, topological identity and perceived incivilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology,24, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishwick, L., & Vining, J. (1992). Toward a phenomenology of recreation place. Journal of Environmental Psychology,12, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foland, A., & Lewicka, M. (2007). Psi-map: Psychological method for psycho-cartographic research. Paper presented at the poster presented at the Xth European congress of psychology, Prague.Google Scholar
Hernández, B., Hidalgo, M. C., Salazar-Laplace, M. E., & Hess, S. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 310–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology,21, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, A. (1978). Persistence of local sentiments in mass society. In D. Street (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary urban life (pp. 133–162). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Rama, E., & Sala, A. (2009). Edi Rama and Anri Sala conversation at tate modern. Architecture and art: Crossover and collaboration. Retrieved December 15, 2015 from https://vimeo.com/8254763.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.Google Scholar
Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology,30, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Špačková, P., & Ouředníček, M. (2012). Spinning the web: New social contacts of Prague’s suburbanites. Cities,29, 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings. Cognition, Social Behaviour, and the Environment,38, 149–171.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (1985). Attachment to place: Discriminant validity and impacts of disorder and diversity. American Journal of Community Psychology,13, 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temelová, J., & Slezáková, A. (2014). The changing environment and neighbourhood satisfaction in socialist high-rise panel housing estates: The time-comparative perceptions of elderly residents in Prague. Cities,37, 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triantis, L. (2008). Urban change and the production of space: The case of urban renewal in Tirana (2000–2008). Paper presented at workshop “Bringing the city together”, TiranaGoogle Scholar
Tuan, Y. F. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Tuan, Y. F. (1975). Place: An experiential perspective. Geographical Review,65, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar