Advertisement

Place attachment to a larger through a smaller scale: attachment to city through housing typologies in Tirana

  • Edmond ManahasaEmail author
  • Ahsen Özsoy
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

The study examines the attachment to city through housing typologies in an urban context, taking the case of post-socialist Tirana, which was facing the issue of urban identity. The approach of examining attachment to city through housing typology was used because housing is observed to be the predominant morphological stock of the urban fabric, which impacted a quasi-metamorphosis in Tirana’s identity and also because home was found to be the scale of place whose significance was highest from the attachment point of view. The methodology used in the study included sampling, surveying and data processing through SPSS. The sampling of housing typologies was conducted based on their architectural features that had evolved in pre-socialist, socialist and post-socialist periods, within a zone of Tirana called the “Middle Ring”. The questionnaire was administered to 225 inhabitants, namely, 25 dwellers per each of nine housing typologies, while the outputs were processed using SPSS software. Overall, the results showed that most of the interviewed inhabitants were attached to city through their dwellings. Most of the dwellers of seven typologies felt attached to city on different levels, whereas those of two typologies mostly felt unattached; thus, attachment to city is dependent on housing typologies. Predominantly, good location and architectural values of dwellings and slightly less a sense of belonging to a self-described nobility of Tirana were given as reasons for attachment to city. Overall the predictors that influenced the place attachment were found to be dwelling quality and comfort, duration, home ownership and age.

Keywords

Place attachment Scale of places Housing typologies City Tirana 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge that no financial support was received from any institution.

References

  1. Abitz, J. (2006). Post-socialist city development in Tirana. Dissertation, Roskilde University.Google Scholar
  2. Aliaj, B., Lulo, K., & Myftiu, G. (2003). Tirana: The challenge of urban development. Tirana: Cetis.Google Scholar
  3. Altman, I., & Low, S. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 1–12). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anton, C. E., & Lawrence, C. (2014). Home is where the heart is: The effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 451–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckley, T. M. (2003). The relative importance of sociocultural and ecological factors in attachment to place. In: L. E. Kruger (Ed.), Understanding community–forest relations, pp. 105–126. General technical report PNW-GTR-566, U.S. https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr566.pdf.
  6. BIRN. (2015). Tirana municipality profile. Retrieved April 16, 2019 from http://zgjedhje2015.reporter.al/profili-i-bashkise-tirane/.
  7. Bleta, I. (2010). Influences of political regime shifts on the urban scene of a capital city case study: Tirana. Dissertation, METU University.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, B., Perkins, D. D., & Brown, G. (2003). Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bushati, V. (2012). Villas of Tirana: First half of 20th century. Tirana: Polis Press.Google Scholar
  10. Casakin, H., Hernández, & B., Ruiz, C. (2015). Place attachment and place identity in Israeli cities: The influence of city size. Cities, 42, 224–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Case, D. (1996). Contributions of journeys away to the definition of home: An empirical study of a dialectical process. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuba, L., & Hummon, D. M. (1993). A place to call home: Identification with dwelling, community, and region. The Sociological Quarterly, 34, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davenport, M. A., & Anderson, D. H. (2005). Getting from sense of place to place-based management: An interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 625–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 426–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Félonneau, M. L. (2004). Love and loathing of the city: Urbanophilia and urbanophobia, topological identity and perceived incivilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fishwick, L., & Vining, J. (1992). Toward a phenomenology of recreation place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foland, A., & Lewicka, M. (2007). Psi-map: Psychological method for psycho-cartographic research. Paper presented at the poster presented at the Xth European congress of psychology, Prague.Google Scholar
  18. Galster, G. (2001). On the nature of neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38, 2111–2124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hernández, B., Hidalgo, M. C., Salazar-Laplace, M. E., & Hess, S. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 310–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunter, A. (1978). Persistence of local sentiments in mass society. In D. Street (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary urban life (pp. 133–162). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. INSTAT. (2013). Population and housing census 2011-Tirana. Retrieved April 16, 2019 from http://www.instat.gov.al/media/3069/11__tirane.pdf.
  23. Jakupi, E. (2015). The legacy of socialist architecture in Albania: Case study-prefabricated concrete buildings in Tirana. Dissertation, Epoka University.Google Scholar
  24. Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39, 328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lalli, M. (1992). Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement, and empirical findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(4), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewicka, M. (2010). What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manahasa, E. (2017). Place attachment as a tool in examining place identity: A multilayered evaluation through housing in Tirana. PhD dissertation, Istanbul Technical University.Google Scholar
  29. Manahasa, E., & Özsoy, A. (2017). Place attachment in a Tirana neighborhood: The influence of the “Rebirth of the City” project. AZITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 14, 57–70.  https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2017.31932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marcus, C. C. (2006). House as a mirror of self: Exploring the deeper meaning of home. Lake Worth- Florida: Nicolas-Hays.Google Scholar
  31. McHugh, K. E., & Mings, R. C. (1996). The circle of migration: Attachment to place in aging. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86, 530–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mesch, G. S., & Manor, O. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and Behavior, 30, 504–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Milligan, M. J. (1998). Interactional past and potential: The social construction of place attachment. Symbolic Interaction, 21, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Misja, V., & Misja, A. (2004). Observation on the dwellings in Albania: A comparative analysis. Tirana: Akademia e Shkencave e Shqipërisë, Instituti i Ekonomisë.Google Scholar
  35. Moore, J. (2000). Placing home in context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nase, I., & Ocakçi, M. (2010). Urban pattern dichotomy in tirana: socio-spatial impact of liberalism. European Planning Studies, 18, 1837–1861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. New-York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
  38. Onea, D. (2012). Spatial and social dimension in urban community: A case study on the community in the center of the Bucharest City. Cinq Continents, 2, 34–50.Google Scholar
  39. Orbán, A. (2005). Formal and informal cooperation in Hungarian condominiums. Review of Sociology, 11, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pojani, D. (2010). Tirana-City profile. Cities, 27, 483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pojani, D., & Baar, K. (2016). Multi-family housing management in post-socialist countries: The Albanian experience. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31, 743–760.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-016-9498-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pojani, D., & Buka, M. (2015). From camaraderie to detachment: The effect of built environment transformations on neighbourhood relations in a post-socialist context. Cities, 49, 66–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Porteous, J. D. (1976). Home: The territorial core. Geographical Review, 66, 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rama, E., & Sala, A. (2009). Edi Rama and Anri Sala conversation at tate modern. Architecture and art: Crossover and collaboration. Retrieved December 15, 2015 from https://vimeo.com/8254763.
  45. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  46. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Špačková, P., & Ouředníček, M. (2012). Spinning the web: New social contacts of Prague’s suburbanites. Cities, 29, 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings. Cognition, Social Behaviour, and the Environment, 38, 149–171.Google Scholar
  49. Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (1985). Attachment to place: Discriminant validity and impacts of disorder and diversity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Temelová, J., & Slezáková, A. (2014). The changing environment and neighbourhood satisfaction in socialist high-rise panel housing estates: The time-comparative perceptions of elderly residents in Prague. Cities, 37, 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Triantis, L. (2008). Urban change and the production of space: The case of urban renewal in Tirana (20002008). Paper presented at workshop “Bringing the city together”, TiranaGoogle Scholar
  52. Tuan, Y. F. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  53. Tuan, Y. F. (1975). Place: An experiential perspective. Geographical Review, 65, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  55. Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences, 14, 29–46.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409209513155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureEpoka UniversityTiranaAlbania
  2. 2.Department of ArchitectureIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations