Advertisement

Toward building a 3D Web-based spatial decision framework for apartment selection

  • Hakan Emekli
  • Caner GuneyEmail author
Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

In the last few decades, there has been a growing interest in effectively incorporating the analytic modeling capabilities of decision support systems and the spatial modeling capabilities of geospatial information systems to solve complex spatial decision-making problems in various fields. Spatial decision support systems assist decision makers in exploring, structuring, and generating solutions for complicated spatial decision problems such as apartment selection. The selection of an apartment is a decision which plays an important role in human life. The good location is the critical factor that affects the value and potential of a real estate. This emphasizes the significance of spatial factors in decision making in real estate business. The spatial accessibility value of each apartment to different service categories can be used while choosing the most suitable apartment. Hence, the study covers not only non-spatial aspects, for example, unit price, house size, and number of rooms, but also spatial aspects, such as spatial accessibility, of the apartment selection. To sum up, this study proposes a spatial decision framework, called EMEKLI, to facilitate the decision-making process for the selection of an apartment in the presence of different priorities and uncertainties among the decision criteria. Furthermore, the recommendations obtained from the decision-making process are shared with the decision makers in the 3D environment through a virtual globe.

Keywords

Geospatial information system Web-based spatial decision support system Multicriteria decision analysis Analytic hierarchy process Spatial accessibility Three-dimensional Web mapping Real estate industry 

Notes

References

  1. Afsari, K., Eastman, C. M., & Castro-Lacouture, D. (2017). JavaScript object notation (JSON) data serialization for IFC schema in web-based BIM data exchange. Automation in Construction, 77, 24–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boroushaki, S., & Malczewski, J. (2010). Measuring consensus for collaborative decision-making: A GIS-based approach. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34, 322–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burdziej, J. (2012). A web-based spatial decision support system for accessibility analysis—concepts and methods. Applied Geomatics, 4, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, Y., Shooraj, E., Rajabifard, A., & Sabri, S. (2018). From IFC to 3D tiles: An integrated open-source solution for visualising BIMs on cesium. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(10), 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crossland, M. D., Wynne, B. E., & Perkins, W. C. (1995). Spatial decision support systems: An overview of technology and a test of efficacy. Decision Support Systems, 14(3), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Curtin, K. M. (2007). Network analysis in geographic information science: Review, assessment, and projections. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34(2), 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Densham, P. J. (1991). Spatial decision support systems. In D. J. Maguire, M. S. Goodchild, & D. W. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical information systems: Principles and applications (pp. 403–412). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  8. Eldrandaly, K. A., & AbdelAziz, N. M. (2012). Enhancing ArcGIS decision making capabilities using an intelligent multicriteria decision analysis toolbox. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 20(1), 44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans, S., & Hudson-Smith, A. (2001). Information rich 3D computer modeling of urban environments. CASA Working Papers (35). CASA, University College London (UCL) Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London.Google Scholar
  10. Guney, C. (2016). Rethinking GIS towards the vision of smart cities through CityGML. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/W1, 121–129. Retrieved August 14, 2018, from  https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w1-121-2016.
  11. Guney, C., Akdag, S.G., Çagdas, G. & Yavuz, S. (2012). Tailoring a geomodel for analyzing an urban skyline. Landscape and Urban Planning. ISSN: 0169-2046.Google Scholar
  12. Hansen, W. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(1), 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hsu, C. Y., Goh, J., & Chang, P. C. (2012). Development of decision support system for house evaluation and purchasing. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering, 6(5). Retrieved July 22, 2018, from https://waset.org/publications/12468/development-of-decision-support-system-for-house-evaluation-and-purchasing.
  14. Jankowski, P. (1995). Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 9, 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Mollaghasemi, M., & Pet-Edwards, J. (1997). Making multi-objective decisions. California: IEEE Computer Society Press.Google Scholar
  17. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Simpson, W. (1987). Workplace location, residential location, and urban commuting. Urban Studies, 24, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sugumaran, V., & Sugumaran, R. (2007). Web-based spatial decision support systems (WebSDSS): Evolution, architecture, examples and challenges. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 5, 40.Google Scholar
  20. URL 1: Bigpixel website. (n.d.). Retrieved December 18, 2018, from http://www.bigpixel.cn.
  21. URL 2: Cesium website. (n.d.). Retrieved July 13, 2017, from https://cesiumjs.org/.
  22. URL 3: Github website. (n.d.). Retrieved July 13, 2017, from https://github.com/AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium.
  23. URL 4: 3D Tiles Specification, Github website. (n.d.). Retrieved July 13, 2017, from https://github.com/AnalyticalGraphicsInc/3d-tiles/tree/master/specification#tileset-json.
  24. URL 5: 3D Tiles, Cesium website. (n.d.). Retrieved July 13, 2017, from https://cesium.com/blog/2015/08/10/introducing-3d-tiles.
  25. URL 6: Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) website. (n.d.). Retrieved February 5, 2019, from https://www.opengeospatial.org/pressroom/pressreleases/2946.
  26. URL 7: Building Smart website. (n.d). Retrieved March 21, 2019, from http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/specifications/ifc-overview.
  27. Waddell, P. (1993). Exogenous workplace choice in residential location models: Is the assumption valid? Geographical Analysis, 25, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zeng, T. Q., & Zhou, Q. (2001). Optimal spatial decision making using GIS: a prototype of a real estate geographical information system. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(4), 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Li, J., & Chen, B. (2009). Application of GIS and spatial decision support system for affordable housing. In 4th international conference on computer science & education (pp. 1110–1115). Nanning.Google Scholar
  30. Zhu, X., & Liu, S. (2004). Analysis of the Impact of the MRT system on accessibility in Singapore using an integrated GIS tool. Journal of Transport Geography, 12, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geomatics Engineering, Civil Engineering FacultyIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Geospatial Information TechnologiesIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations