Determinants of growth in non-municipal areas of Delhi: rural–urban dichotomy revisited

  • Manisha JainEmail author
  • Artem Korzhenevych
  • N. Sridharan


The current discourse on urbanization calls for new approaches to capture the peculiarities of growth in the global South. This paper takes the National Capital Territory of Delhi as a case study and adopts a mix of methods (field survey, ordinary least squares regression and geographically weighted regression) to highlight the emerging gradient of urbanization within official rural areas. The results show a certain catching-up effect in which the settlements with low population and employment rate grow faster than more urbanized settlements. Settlements with low basic infrastructure provision (such as schools and medical facilities), which are mainly census towns, tend to grow more slowly than villages with better infrastructure provision. Additionally, local characteristics of growth vary spatially depending on the distribution of socio-economic, demographic, and infrastructure variables. To avoid the unplanned transformation of villages into urban areas in Delhi and similar regions of the global South, this paper recommends moving from master planning towards strategic spatial planning, implementing integrated planning and governance of non-municipal peri-urban areas, and reforming spatial plans and development policies based on scientific methods.


India Urban and rural Ordinary least squares regression Geographically weighted regression Field survey 



The authors wish to express their gratitude to the German Research Foundation (DFG) for funding this research under the Grant GZ: JA 2567/2-1.


  1. Allen, A. (2003). Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: perspectives on an emerging field. Environment & Urbanization, 15(1), 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansari, J. (2004). Time for a new approach in India. Habitat Debate, 10(4), 15.Google Scholar
  3. Bhagat, R. (2005). Rural-Urban classification and municipal governance in India. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 26(1), 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhagat, R. (2014). Urban migration trends, challenges and opportunities in India. World Migration Report 2015. International Organization for Migration.Google Scholar
  5. Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2–3), 151–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Champion, T., & Hugo, G. (2003). Beyond the urban-rural dichotomy: Towards a new conceptualisation of settlement for demographers. Paper presented at the PAA2003 Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, 1–3 May.Google Scholar
  7. Charlton, M., Fotheringham, A., & Brunsdon, C. (2003). Software for geographically weighted regression. Spatial analysis research group. Newcastle upon Tyne: Department of Geography, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
  8. Chattopadhyay, S. (2015). Financing India’s urban infrastructure: Current practices and reform options. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 7(1), 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaurasia, R., & Gulati, C. (2008). India: The state of population 2007. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Denis, E., & Marius-Gnanou, K. (2011). Toward a better appraisal of urbanization in India: A fresh look at the landscape of morphological agglomerates. Cybergeo European Journal of Geography. (
  11. DIVA-GIS (2017) ‘Download data by country’. Available from
  12. Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2013). The growth of cities. In S. Durlauf & P. Aghion (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  13. European Commission (EC). (2017). GHSL-global human settlement layer. Available from
  14. Fotheringham, A., Charlton, M., & Brundson, C. (1998). Geographically weighted regression: A natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis. Environment and Planning A, 30(11), 1905–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaser, E., & Kohlhase, J. (2004). Cities, regions and the decline of transport costs. Papers in Regional Science, 83, 197–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaser, E., Kolka, J., & Saiz, A. (2001). Consumer city. Journal of Economic Geography, 1(2001), 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Government of India (GoI). (2001a). Primary census abstract: Ministry of home affairs. New Delhi: The Registrar General and Census Commissioner.Google Scholar
  18. Government of India (GoI). (2001b). Town directory India: Ministry of home affairs. New Delhi: The Registrar General and Census Commissioner.Google Scholar
  19. Government of India (GoI). (2001c). Area and population. New Delhi: The Registrar General and Census Commissioner.Google Scholar
  20. Government of India (GoI). (2011a). Primary census abstract: Ministry of home affairs. New Delhi: The Registrar General and Census Commissioner.Google Scholar
  21. Government of India (GoI). (2011b). Town directory India: Ministry of home affairs. New Delhi: The Registrar General and Census Commissioner.Google Scholar
  22. Government of NCT of Delhi (GNCT). (2013). Economic Survey of Delhi 2012–2013: Demographic profile. Planning Department, Government of NCT of Delhi, India. Accessed from:
  23. Grimes, A., Apatov, E., Lutchman, L., & Robinson, A. (2014). Infrastructure’s long-lived impact on urban development: Theory and emprics. Motu Working Paper pp. 14–11.Google Scholar
  24. Harris, J. (1982). Rural development, theories of peasant economy and agrarian change. London: Hutchinson University Library.Google Scholar
  25. Haughwout, A. (1999). State infrastructure and the geography of employment. Growth and Change, 30, 549–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haughwout, A. (2001). Infrastructure and social welfare in metropolitan America. Economic Policy Review, 7(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
  27. Hugo, G., Champion, A., & Lattes, A. (2003). Toward a new conceptualization of settlements for demography. Population and Development Review, 29(2), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jain, M. (2018). Contemporary urbanization as unregulated growth in India: The story of census towns. Cities, 73, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jain, M., & Korzhenevych, A. (2017). Spatial disparities, transport infrastructure and decentralization policy in the Delhi region. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 143(3), XX.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jimenez, E. (1994). Human and physical infrastructure: Public investment and pricing policies in developing countries. In J. Behrman & T. T. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 3). Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  31. Kroll, F., Müller, F., Bell, S., Haase, D., et al. (2009). Indicator framework for evaluating impacts of land use changes. Peri-urban land use relationships- strategies and sustainability assessment tools for urban-rural linkages, integrated project. (PLUREL): Strategies and sustainability assessment tools for urban-rural linkages, integrated project. Contract No. 036921, D4.3.1.Google Scholar
  32. Kundu, A. (2011). Method in madness: Urban data from 2011 census. Economic & Political Weekly, xlvi, 40, 13–16.Google Scholar
  33. Kuruvilla, Y. (2014). Census towns in Kerala: Challenges of urban transformation. In: International Conference for Deepening Democracy Through Participatory Local Governance, At Kovalam, Thiruvananthapuram (January 2014).Google Scholar
  34. Liu, Y., Jiang, S., Liu, Y., Wang, R., Li, X., et al. (2011). Spatial epidemiology and spatial ecology study of worldwide drug-resistant tuberculosis. International Journal of Health Geographic, 10(50), 1–10.Google Scholar
  35. Mawby, R., Armstrong, M., & Hay, D. (2009). An analysis of social infrastructure and city competitivenessSynthesis and key findings. Project: Social Infrastructure for Competitive Cities. Acessed from:
  36. Mukhopadhyay, P., Zérah, M., Samanta, G., & Maria, A. (2016). Understanding India’s urban frontier: What is behind the emergence of Census Towns in India?. Washington: The World Bank Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Munnell, A. (1992). Policy watch: Infrastructure investments and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6, 89–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nijkamp, P. (1986). Infrastructure and regional development: A multidimensional policy analysis. empec, 11, 1–21.Google Scholar
  39. Partridge, M., Ali, K., & Olfert, M. (2010). Rural-to-urban commuting: Three degrees of integration. Growth and Change, 41(2), 303–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pradhan, K. (2017). Unacknowledged urbanisation: The New Census Towns in India. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zerah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 39–66). Delhi: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Punia, M., Kumar, R., Singh, L., & Kaushik, S. (2017). Comparison of peripheral metropolitanisation in Haryana and Rajasthan, India. In Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 141–165). New Delhi: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ravetz, J., Fertner, C., & Nielsen, T. (2013). The dynamics of peri-urbanization. In K. Nilsson, S. Pauleit, S. Bell, C. Aalbers, & T. Sick Nielsen (Eds.), Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Roy, A. (2009). The 21st-Century metropolis: New geographies of theory. Regional Studies, 43(6), 819–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roy, S., & Pradhan, K. (2018). Census towns in India: current patterns and future discourses. Working paper. Center for Policy Research.Google Scholar
  45. Samanta, G. (2014). The politics of classification and the complexity of governance in Census Towns. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX, 22, 55–62.Google Scholar
  46. Schneider, A., & Mertes, C. (2014). Expansion and growth in Chinese cities, 1978–2010. Environmental Research Letters, 9, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schneider, A., & Woodcock, C. (2008). Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Studies, 45(3), 659–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schoff, C., & Yang, T.-C. (2012). Spatially varying predictors of teenage birth rates among counties in the United States. Demographic Research, 27(14), 377–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shaw, A. (2005). Peri-urban interface of Indian cities: Growth, governance and local initiatives. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(2), 129–136.Google Scholar
  50. Sivaramakrishnan, C., Kundu, A., & Singh, B. (2005). Handbook of urbanisation in India: An analysis of trends and processes. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sridharan, N. (2011). Spatial inequality and the politics of urban expansion. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 2(2), 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stroper, M., & Scott, A. (2016). Current debates in urban theory: A critical assessment. Urban Studies, 53(6), 1114–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tacoli, C. (2003). The links between rural and urban development. Environment and Urbanization, 15(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. United Nations (UN). (2017). World population prospects: Key findings and advanced tables. 2017 revision. New York: UN.Google Scholar
  55. Uzell, D. (1979). Conceptual fallacies in the rural-urban dichotomy. Urban Anthropology, 8(3/4), 333–350.Google Scholar
  56. Van Duijne, R. J. (2017). What is India’s urbanization riddle?. Economic and Political Weekly, LII, 28, 76–77.Google Scholar
  57. Wang, N., Mei, L., & Yan, C. (2008). Local linear estimation of spatially varying coefficient models: an improvement on the geographically weighted regression technique. Environment and Planning A, 40(4), 986–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Watson, V. (2009). Seeing from the south: Refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Studies, 46 (11), 2259–2275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. World Bank (WB). (2013). Urbanization beyond municipal boundaries: Nurturing metropolitan economies and connecting peri-urban areas in India. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yoo, D. (2012). Height and death in the Antebellum United States: A view through the lens of geographically weighted regression. Economics and Human Biology, 10, 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zerah, M.-H. (2017). Shedding light on social and economic changes in small towns through the prism of local governance: A case study of Haryana. In E. Denis & M.-H. Zerah (Eds.), Subaltern urbanisation in India (pp. 371–395). Delhi: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional DevelopmentDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Business and EconomicsTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  3. 3.Director, School of Planning and ArchitectureBhopalIndia

Personalised recommendations