Advertisement

Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 987–1004 | Cite as

Apartment complexes in the Korean housing market: what are the benefits of agglomeration?

  • Hee Jin YangEmail author
  • Mack Joong Choi
Article
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

The Korean government has codified a unique set of regulations that requires developers to provide certain types and sizes of community and commercial facilities in proportion to the number of housing units in an apartment complex, given the lack of public funds necessary to create a livable and self-sufficient environment. To answer the question of why large-scale apartment complexes have been popular in the Korean housing market, this study illuminates the agglomeration benefits resulting from the integration of community and commercial facilities in apartment complexes. Using hedonic regressions and causal mediation analysis, it concludes that the agglomeration benefits of apartment complexes associated with an increase in the size of both community and commercial facilities outweigh the congestion diseconomies caused by an increase in the number of housing units. This implies that the government’s intervention has made large-scale development of residential areas financially feasible without the use of public expenditure.

Keywords

Korean housing development Apartment complex Community and commercial facilities Agglomeration benefits Causal mediation analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was developed from the doctoral dissertation of Yang (2017), supervised by the late Professor Mack Joong Choi. The author expresses gratitude to two anonymous referees and the dissertation committee, Professor Seoung Hwan Suh, Euijune Kim, In Kwon Park, and Kyung-min Kim for their helpful and valuable comments.

References

  1. Arnott, R. J. (1979). Optimal city size in a spatial economy. Journal of Urban Economics, 6, 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berglas, E. (1976). On the theory of clubs. The American Economic Review, 66(2), 116–121.Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi, M. J., & Kim, H. J. (2017). Effects of aircraft noise and building height restriction on multi-family housing prices: From a viewpoint of consumption and investment demand of housing. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 23(5), 103–111. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  5. Choi, M. J., Lim, Y. R., & Park, K. J. (2014). Empirical evidence of Korean Urban development model for mass production housing. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 49(4), 141–153. (in Korean).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chun, H. S. (2003). A study on rapid spread of apartment housing in Korea. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 37, 65–81. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  7. Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1986). The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dong-A-Il-Bo. (1966, December 10). Mang-gag-jidae-uisilib-doseogwan (Title in translation: Needs for public libraries ignored).Google Scholar
  9. Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2003). Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In Henderson, V. & Thisse, F. (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 4, Chap. 48). UK: North-Holland Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Glazer, A., Gradstein, M., & Ranjan, P. (2003). Consumption variety and urban agglomeration. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33, 653–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graves, P. E., & Knapp, T. A. (1985). Hedonic analysis in a spatial context: Theoretical problems in valuing location-specific amenities. The Economic Record, 61(4), 737–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hannah, L., Kim, K. H., & Mills, E. (1993). Land use controls and housing prices in Korea. Urban Studies, 30(1), 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Gilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hicks, R., & Tingley, D. (2011). Causal mediation analysis. The Stata Journal, 11(4), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hidalgo, C. A., & Castaner, E. E. (2015). The amenity space and the evolution of neighborhoods. Cornell University. arXiv:1509.02868 [physics.soc-ph].
  16. Jin, Y. N., & Son, J. Y. (2005). Education and housing prices: Evidence from Seoul apartment market. Housing Studies Review, 13(3), 125–148. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  17. Kang, B. S., Kang, I. H., Park, G. J., Park, I. S., Parkt, C. S., Baek, H. S., et al. (1999). hangug gongdong jutaeg-gyehoeg-ui yeogsa (History of the Korean Housing Plan). Seoul: Sejinsa Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  18. Kim, C.-H., & Kim, K.-H. (2000). The political economy of Korean government policies on real estate. Urban Studies, 37(7), 1157–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim, Y. J., & Choi, M. J. (2015). Why have big construction companies replaced real estate developers in Korea? International Journal of Urban Sciences, 19(2), 206–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knapp, T. A., & Graves, P. E. (1989). On the Role of amenities in models of migration and regional development. Journal of Regional Science, 29(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Korea National Housing Corporation (KNHC). (1987). Daedanwe dansi gyebal sarae yeongu (Case studies on large-scale complex development). Seoul: KNHC.Google Scholar
  22. Korea Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). (2015). Population and Housing Census 1970–2015. Retrieved December 6, 2017 from http://kosis.kr.
  23. Kyung-Hyang-Sin-Moon. (1976, August 10). Pali mogitte geugseong geunbonjeog-in bagmyeol daechaeg-eul (Title in translation: It needs to seek ways to eradicate highly flourishing of flies and mosquito swarm).Google Scholar
  24. Lee, B. S., Jung, E. C., & Kim, Y. H. (2005). Dwelling Age, redevelopment, and housing prices: The case of apartment complexes in Seoul. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 30(1), 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, H., Wei, Y. D., Yu, Z., & Tian, G. (2016). Amenity, accessibility, and housing values in metropolitan USA: A study of Salt Lake County, Utah. Cities, 59, 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McGuire, M. (1974). Group segregation and optimal jurisdictions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 112–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McLafferty, S. L., & Ghosh, A. (1986). Multipurpose shopping and the location of retail frims. Geographical Analysis, 18(3), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT). (2016). Jugeo siltaejosa (Korea housing survey) 2016. Retrieved January 18, 2018 from http://www.hnuri.go.kr.
  29. Ogawa, H. (1998). Preference for product variety and city size. Urban Studies, 35(1), 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perry, C. A. (1929). City planning for neighborhood life. Oxford Journals, 8(1), 98–100.Google Scholar
  31. Richardson, H. W. (1972). Optimality in city size, systems of cities and urban policy: A sceptic’s view. Urban Studies, 9(1), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. The Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ryu, K. H., & Kim, J. A. (2018). Jeonse, will it be extinguished? Differentiation of Korean rental housing market. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 33, 409–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sandler, T., & Tschirhart, J. (1997). Club theory: Thirty years later. Public Choice, 93(3), 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwab, R. M., & Oates, W. E. (1991). Community composition and the provision of local public goods: A normative analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 44, 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seoul Statistical Yearbook (2010). Housing statistics. Retrieved January 18, 2018 from http://ebook.seoul.go.kr.
  37. Son, J.-Y. (1997). A Review of the Korean housing market and related policies. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 9, 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vreeker, R., Groot, H. L. F., & Verhoef, E. T. (2004). Urban mutifunctional land use: Theoretical and empirical insights on economies of scale, scope, and diversity. Built Environment, 30(4), 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wen, H., Xiao, Y., & Zhang, L. (2017). School district, education quality, and housing price: Evidence from a natural experiment in Hangzhou, China. Cities, 66, 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang, H. J. (2017). Agglomeration economies in multi-family housing estate developments in Korea: Internalization and enlargement of public and commercial facilities. Ph.D. Dissertation, Seoul: Seoul National University (in Korean).Google Scholar
  41. Yang, H. J., Song, J. H., & Choi, M. J. (2017). Measuring the Externality effects of commercial land use on residential land value: A case study of seoul. Sustainability, 8, 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yoon, I. S. (1994). Housing in a newly industrialized economy: The case of South Korea. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute of Agriculture and Life SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Graduate School of Environmental StudiesSeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations