Advertisement

Incidence and Profile of Severe Cycling Injuries After Bikeway Infrastructure Changes

  • Derek Goerke
  • Emily Zolfaghari
  • Ashley P. Marek
  • Frederick W. Endorf
  • Rachel M. NygaardEmail author
Original Paper
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether bicycling infrastructure changes in the city of Minneapolis effectively reduced the incidence or severity of traumatic bicycling related injuries sustained by patients admitted to our Level 1 Trauma Center. Data for this retrospective cohort study was obtained from the trauma database at our institution and retrospective chart review. The total number of miles of bikeway in the city on a yearly basis was used to demonstrate the change in cycling infrastructure. Adjusted regression analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in ISS when total bike lane miles increased (Coef. − 0.04, P < 0.001). Increasing bike lane miles was also associated with a significant reduction in severe head injury (OR 0.99, P < 0.001) and ICU LOS (Coef. − 0.17, P = 0.013). The miles of bike lanes were not associated with any significant changes in mortality or mechanical ventilation days when adjusted for other factors. We were able to demonstrate a reduction in the severity of injuries incurred by cyclists in the setting of a significant increase in the total number of bicycle lane miles. Our data lends credence to the existing evidence that the addition of bicycle lane miles increases cyclist safety.

Keywords

Bicycle Bike Trauma Infrastructure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Eric Heuer for his aid in categorizing some of the data. The authors would also like to thank the city of Minneapolis for providing details on infrastructure changes.

Author Contributions

Goerke: Literature search, study design, data interpretation, data analysis, writing. Zolfaghari: Data analysis, critical revision. Marek: Data interpretation, writing, critical revision. Endorf: Study design, data interpretation, critical revision. Nygaard: Study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, critical revision.

Funding

There was no funding associated with this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

  1. 1.
    Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2016). Safer cycling through improved infrastructure. American Journal of Public Health, 106, 2089–2091.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303507.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gordon-Larsen, P., Boone-Heinonen, J., Sidney, S., et al. (2009). Active commuting and cardiovascular disease risk. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169, 1216.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.163.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck, L. F., Dellinger, A. M., & O’Neil, M. E. (2007). Motor vehicle crash injury rates by mode of travel, united states: Using exposure-based methods to quantify differences. American Journal of Epidemiology, 166, 212–218.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm064.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    LAB_Where_We_Ride_2016.pdf. Retrieved October 1, 2018, from https://www.bikeleague.org/sites/default/files/LAB_Where_We_Ride_2016.pdf.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    NTPP - Bicycle and Pedestrian Program - Environment - FHWA. Retrieved October 3, 2018, from https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/ntpp/.
  7. 7.
    Neumann, M. V., Eley, R., Vallmuur, K., et al. (2016). Current profile of cycling injuries: A retrospective analysis of a trauma centre level 1 in Queensland. Emerg Med Australas, 28, 90–95.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12495.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pedroso, F. E., Angriman, F., Bellows, A. L., et al. (2016). Bicycle use and cyclist safety following Boston’s bicycle infrastructure expansion, 2009–2012. American Journal of Public Health, 106, 2171–2177.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303454.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harris, M. A., Reynolds, C. C. O., Winters, M., et al. (2013). Comparing the effects of infrastructure on bicycling injury at intersections and non-intersections using a case–crossover design. Inj Prev, 19, 303–310.  https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040561.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., et al. (2008). The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 344–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hamann, C., & Peek-Asa, C. (2013). On-road bicycle facilities and bicycle crashes in Iowa, 2007–2010. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 56, 103–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reynolds, C. C., Harris, M. A., Teschke, K., et al. (2009). The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes: A review of the literature. Environ Heal, 8, 47.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-8-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Høye, A. (2018). Bicycle helmets—To wear or not to wear? A meta-analyses of the effects of bicycle helmets on injuries. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 117, 85–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacobsen, P. L. (2003). Safety in numbers: More walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling. Inj Prev, 9, 205–209.  https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.9.3.205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Magazine B. Bicycling’s Top 50. Bicycling. Retrieved October 16, 2018, from https://www.bicycling.com/rides/a20025419/bike-friendly-cities-americas-best-bike-cities/.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryHennepin HealthcareMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryHennepin Healthcare Research InstituteMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations