Community Perceptions of Comprehensive Harm Reduction Programs and Stigma Towards People Who Inject Drugs in Rural Virginia
The spread of infectious diseases, including Human Immunodeficiency virus and Hepatitis C virus, is a major risk of injection drug use. The Center for Disease Control’s 2015 ranking of counties vulnerable to rapid dissemination of HIV/HCV infection among people who inject drugs (PWID) places Dickenson County, Virginia at 29th in the nation and 2nd in Virginia. Comprehensive Harm Reduction is an evidence-based intervention shown to reduce the negative impacts of drug use including the spread of infectious diseases, overdose and death among people who are unable or not ready to stop using drugs. The aim of this study was to assess community perceptions of comprehensive harm reduction programs and stigma towards PWID in a rural community. Data were collected through the use of an anonymous survey and interviews with community stakeholders. Surveys were distributed online through email and social media, as well as in person. Participants were included based on their zip code as an indicator of residence in Dickenson County. Statistical analysis of survey results was conducted using Sigma Plot. The survey was completed by 153 participants. The perception of PWID in rural Virginia is strikingly negative. Participants consider injection drug use a major problem in their community but have little to no knowledge of harm reduction programs and display high levels of stigma towards PWID. Additionally, higher levels of stigma towards PWID was associated with lower support for CHR programs. The results of this study show a definite and perceived need for harm reduction programs in rural Virginia. Challenges to implementing harm reduction programs include low levels of knowledge and high levels of stigma.
KeywordsPWID HCV Harm reduction CHR Needle and syringe program NSP
We would like to thank Dickenson County Behavioral Health Services, Dickenson County Community Partners for Prevention Coalition, Haysi Partners, Virginia Department of Health, Selena Culbertson, Jason Dotson, Matt Owens, Daniel Hunsucker, Dr. Eleanor Cantrell, and Dr. Rebecca Dillingham.
This work was supported by the Healthy Appalachia Institute at the University of Virginia’s College at Wise.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
- 1.Abdul-Quader, A. S., Feelemyer, J., Modi, S., et al. (2013). Effectiveness of structural-level needle/syringe programs to reduce HCV and HIV infection among people who inject drugs: A systematic review. AIDS and Behavior, 17(9), 2878–2892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0593-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Page, K., Morris, M. D., Hahn, J. A., Maher, L., & Prins, M. (2013). Injection drug use and hepatitis C virus infection in young adult injectors: Using evidence to inform comprehensive prevention. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 57(Suppl 2), S32–S38. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Zibbell, J. E., Iqbal, K., Patel, R. C., et al. (2015). Increases in hepatitis C virus infection related to injection drug use among persons aged ≤ 30 years—Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, 2006-2012. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 64(17), 453–458.Google Scholar
- 8.Young, A. M., & Havens, J. R. (2012). Transition from first illicit drug use to first injection drug use among rural Appalachian drug users: A cross-sectional comparison and retrospective survival analysis. Addiction (Abingdon England), 107(3), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03635.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Van Handel, M. M., Rose, C. E., Hallisey, E. J., et al. (2016). County-level vulnerability assessment for rapid dissemination of HIV or HCV infections among persons who inject drugs, United States. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 1999, 73(3), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000001098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.US Census Bureau. US Census Bureau QuickFacts: Dickenson County, Virginia. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/dickensoncountyvirginia/PST045218.
- 15.Appalachian Regional Commission. Subregions in appalachia. https://www.arc.gov/research/MapsofAppalachia.asp?MAP_ID=31.
- 16.Virginia Department of Health. Office of the Chief Medical Examiner’s Annual Report, 2014. http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/content/uploads/sites/18/2016/04/Annual-Report-2014-FINAL.pdf.
- 17.Virginia Department of Health. (2016). Virginia Hepatitis C Epidemiologic Report 2016. http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/content/uploads/sites/10/2016/06/Virginia-Hepatitis-C-Epidemiologic-Profile-2016.pdf.
- 19.Virginia Department of Health. Comprehensive harm reduction. http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/disease-prevention/chr/.
- 20.Davis, S. M., Daily, S., Kristjansson, A. L., et al. (2017). Needle exchange programs for the prevention of hepatitis C virus infection in people who inject drugs: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Harm Reduction Journal, 14(1), 25–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-017-0156-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Hagan, H., McGough, J. P., Thiede, H., Hopkins, S., Duchin, J., & Alexander, E. R. (2000). Reduced injection frequency and increased entry and retention in drug treatment associated with needle-exchange participation in Seattle drug injectors. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 19(3), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(00)00104-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Davis, S. M., Davidov, D., Kristjansson, A. L., Zullig, K., Baus, A., & Fisher, M. (2018). Qualitative case study of needle exchange programs in the Central Appalachian region of the United States. PLoS ONE, 13(10), e0205466–e0205466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Allen, S. T., Grieb, S. M., O’Rourke, A., et al. (2019). Understanding the public health consequences of suspending a rural syringe services program: A qualitative study of the experiences of people who inject drugs. Harm Reduction Journal, 16(1), 33–33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-019-0305-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Wright, K. (2005). Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x.Google Scholar