A Mixed-Methods Assessment of a Peer-Enforced Tobacco- and Smoke-Free Policy at a Large Urban University
- 74 Downloads
The study aims to evaluate the enforcement, opinions, and effectiveness of the University of South Florida’s tobacco free policy one year following implementation. By assessing readiness to change and using geographic information system (GIS) mapping this study sought to introduce a unique and effective way of evaluating college tobacco free policies. A cross-sectional survey was administered to students, faculty, and staff to assess knowledge of policy and resources, tobacco use observations, stage change regarding policy enforcement, self-efficacy to enforce, and policy impact on perceived campus tobacco use (n = 5242). Additionally, using ArcGIS Collector (in: ESRI, ArcGIS desktop: release 10, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, 2011) volunteers collected geospatial data on tobacco use continuing to occur on campus following policy implementation. Overall there was moderate knowledge of the current policy and low beliefs for policy enforcement. Majority of respondents were not approaching violators to remind them of the policy and did not plan to do so in the future. There were statistically significant differences between smokers and non-smokers as well as between students and faculty and staff. The mapping of observed violations revealed continued tobacco use on campus with 158 data points. From both the geospatial results as well as the survey findings, the current policy is ineffective in reducing tobacco use across campus. With rapidly increasing numbers of smoke and tobacco free universities, new and innovative evaluation tools are needed so institution leaders can efficiently evaluate their implementation.
KeywordsTobacco use College student Tobacco-free policy Geographic information systems (GIS) Transtheoretical model
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
This study was performed according to legal and ethical guidelines of the US and approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the university.
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Fact sheets caffeine and alcohol. Retrieved November 15, 2017 from https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/caffeine-and-alcohol.htm.
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Smoking and tobacco use fact sheet: Adult cigarette smoking in the United States. Retrieved April 30, 2018 from https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/adult_data/cig_smoking/index.htm.
- 5.American College Health Association. (2017). American college health association-national college health assessment II: Reference group executive summary spring 2017. Hanover: American College Health Association.Google Scholar
- 6.American College Health Association. (2017). Healthy campus 2020—Student objectives. Retrieved October 1, 2017 from https://www.acha.org/HealthyCampus/Objectives/Student_Objectives/HealthyCampus/Student_Objectives.aspx?hkey=a9f191de-243b-41c6-b913-c012961ecab9.
- 8.Hall, M. E., Williams, R. D., & Hunt, B. (2015). Assessment of attitudes regarding tobacco-free campus policy and secondhand smoke exposure among college students, faculty, and staff. American Journal of Health Education, 46(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2014.945671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Institute for Global Tobacco Control. (2013). Smoke-free: What does success look like? Indicators of a smoke-free jurisdiction. Retrieved October 1, 2017 from http://globaltobaccocontrol.org/sites/default/files/2013IndicatorsSuccess.pdf.
- 17.University of South Florida. (2017). USF system facts: 2016–2017. Retrieved January 10, 2018 from http://www.usf.edu/ods/resources/system-facts.aspx.
- 18.University of South Florida. (2017). Tobacco free campus. Retrieved January 10, 2018 from http://www.usf.edu/administrative-services/environmental-health-safety/tobacco-free/.
- 20.IBM. (2017). SPSS. Armonk: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
- 21.Lee, J. G. L., Ranney, L. M., & Goldstein, A. O. (2013). Cigarette butts near building entrances: What is the impact of smoke-free college campus policies? Tobacco Control, 22(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Burke, R. C., Cinderich, A. B., Prince, L., & Curtis, A. (2015). Utilizing geographic information systems and spatial video to analyze patterns of secondhand smoke exposure on college campuses. Journal of American College Health, 63(8), 574–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2015.1031239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Kim, A. E., Lieberman, A. J., & Dench, D. (2017). Crowdsourcing data collection of the retail tobacco environment: Case study comparing data from crowdsourced workers to trained data collectors. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051298.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Patel, V., Nowostawski, M., Thomson, G., Wilson, N., & Medlin, H. (2013). Developing a smartphone ‘app’ for public health research: The example of measuring observed smoking in vehicles. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 67(5), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.ESRI. (2011). ArcGIS desktop: Release 10. Redlands: Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
- 29.Microsoft. (2013). Microsoft Office Excel.Google Scholar