Advertisement

A Mixed-Methods Assessment of a Peer-Enforced Tobacco- and Smoke-Free Policy at a Large Urban University

  • Amy Gatto
  • Sarah E. Powell
  • Emily F. Walters
  • Shahriar Zamani
  • Liberty B. Sales
  • Rita DeBateEmail author
Original Paper
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

The study aims to evaluate the enforcement, opinions, and effectiveness of the University of South Florida’s tobacco free policy one year following implementation. By assessing readiness to change and using geographic information system (GIS) mapping this study sought to introduce a unique and effective way of evaluating college tobacco free policies. A cross-sectional survey was administered to students, faculty, and staff to assess knowledge of policy and resources, tobacco use observations, stage change regarding policy enforcement, self-efficacy to enforce, and policy impact on perceived campus tobacco use (n = 5242). Additionally, using ArcGIS Collector (in: ESRI, ArcGIS desktop: release 10, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, 2011) volunteers collected geospatial data on tobacco use continuing to occur on campus following policy implementation. Overall there was moderate knowledge of the current policy and low beliefs for policy enforcement. Majority of respondents were not approaching violators to remind them of the policy and did not plan to do so in the future. There were statistically significant differences between smokers and non-smokers as well as between students and faculty and staff. The mapping of observed violations revealed continued tobacco use on campus with 158 data points. From both the geospatial results as well as the survey findings, the current policy is ineffective in reducing tobacco use across campus. With rapidly increasing numbers of smoke and tobacco free universities, new and innovative evaluation tools are needed so institution leaders can efficiently evaluate their implementation.

Keywords

Tobacco use College student Tobacco-free policy Geographic information systems (GIS) Transtheoretical model 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

This study was performed according to legal and ethical guidelines of the US and approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the university.

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Fact sheets caffeine and alcohol. Retrieved November 15, 2017 from https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/caffeine-and-alcohol.htm.
  2. 2.
    Razani, J., Boone, K., Lesser, I., & Weiss, D. (2004). Effects of cigarette smoking history on cognitive functioning in healthy older adults. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12(4), 404–411.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00019442-200407000-00008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Smoking and tobacco use fact sheet: Adult cigarette smoking in the United States. Retrieved April 30, 2018 from https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/adult_data/cig_smoking/index.htm.
  4. 4.
    Halperin, A. C., & Rigotti, N. A. (2003). US public universities’ compliance with recommended tobacco-control policies. Journal of American College Health, 51(5), 181–188.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07448480309596349.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    American College Health Association. (2017). American college health association-national college health assessment II: Reference group executive summary spring 2017. Hanover: American College Health Association.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    American College Health Association. (2017). Healthy campus 2020—Student objectives. Retrieved October 1, 2017 from https://www.acha.org/HealthyCampus/Objectives/Student_Objectives/HealthyCampus/Student_Objectives.aspx?hkey=a9f191de-243b-41c6-b913-c012961ecab9.
  7. 7.
    Bennett, B. L., Deiner, M., & Pokhrel, P. (2017). College anti-smoking policies and student smoking behavior: A review of the literature. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 15(1), 11.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12971-017-0117-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hall, M. E., Williams, R. D., & Hunt, B. (2015). Assessment of attitudes regarding tobacco-free campus policy and secondhand smoke exposure among college students, faculty, and staff. American Journal of Health Education, 46(1), 48–57.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2014.945671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lupton, J. R., & Townsend, J. L. (2015). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the acceptability and effectiveness of university smoke-free policies. Journal of American College Health, 63(4), 238–247.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2015.1015029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rigotti, N., Regan, S., Moran, S., & Wechsler, H. (2003). Students’ opinion of tobacco control policies recommended for US colleges: A national survey. Tobacco Control, 12(3), 251–256.  https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.12.3.251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Plaspohl, S. S., Parrillo, A. V., Vogel, R., Tedders, S., & Epstein, A. (2012). An assessment of America’s tobacco-free colleges and universities. Journal of American College Health, 60(2), 162–167.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2011.580030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trinidad, D., Gilpin, E., & Pierce, J. (2004). Compliance and support for smoke-free school policies. Health Education Research, 20(4), 466–475.  https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seo, D. C., Macy, J. T., Torabi, M. R., & Middlestadt, S. E. (2011). The effect of a smoke-free campus policy on college students’ smoking behaviors and attitudes. Preventive Medicine, 53(4–5), 347–352.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.07.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Institute for Global Tobacco Control. (2013). Smoke-free: What does success look like? Indicators of a smoke-free jurisdiction. Retrieved October 1, 2017 from http://globaltobaccocontrol.org/sites/default/files/2013IndicatorsSuccess.pdf.
  15. 15.
    Harris, K. J., Stearns, J. N., Kovach, R. G., & Harrar, S. W. (2009). Enforcing an outdoor smoking ban on a college campus: Effects of a multicomponent approach. Journal of American College Health, 58(2), 121–126.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07448480903221285.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fallin-Bennett, A., Roditis, M., & Glantz, S. A. (2017). The carrot and the stick? Strategies to improve compliance with college campus tobacco policies. Journal of American College Health, 65(2), 122–130.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2016.1262380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    University of South Florida. (2017). USF system facts: 2016–2017. Retrieved January 10, 2018 from http://www.usf.edu/ods/resources/system-facts.aspx.
  18. 18.
    University of South Florida. (2017). Tobacco free campus. Retrieved January 10, 2018 from http://www.usf.edu/administrative-services/environmental-health-safety/tobacco-free/.
  19. 19.
    Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1986). Toward a comprehensive model of change. In Treating Addictive Behaviors (pp. 3–27). Boston: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    IBM. (2017). SPSS. Armonk: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, J. G. L., Ranney, L. M., & Goldstein, A. O. (2013). Cigarette butts near building entrances: What is the impact of smoke-free college campus policies? Tobacco Control, 22(2), 107–112.  https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pires, S. F., Block, S., Belance, R., & Marteache, N. (2015). The spatial distribution of smoking violations on a no-smoking campus: Implications for prevention. Journal of American College Health, 64(1), 62–68.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2015.1074239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burke, R. C., Cinderich, A. B., Prince, L., & Curtis, A. (2015). Utilizing geographic information systems and spatial video to analyze patterns of secondhand smoke exposure on college campuses. Journal of American College Health, 63(8), 574–578.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2015.1031239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim, A. E., Lieberman, A. J., & Dench, D. (2017). Crowdsourcing data collection of the retail tobacco environment: Case study comparing data from crowdsourced workers to trained data collectors. Tobacco Control.  https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051298.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Patel, V., Nowostawski, M., Thomson, G., Wilson, N., & Medlin, H. (2013). Developing a smartphone ‘app’ for public health research: The example of measuring observed smoking in vehicles. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 67(5), 446–452.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fallin, A., Murrey, M., Johnson, A. O., Riker, C. A., Rayens, M. K., & Hahn, E. J. (2012). Measuring compliance with tobacco-free campus policy. Journal of American College Health, 60(7), 496–504.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2012.670676.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ickes, M., Gokun, Y., Rayens, M. K., & Hahn, E. J. (2015). Comparing two observational measures to evaluate compliance with tobacco-free campus policy. Health Promotion Practice, 16(2), 210–217.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839914561060.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    ESRI. (2011). ArcGIS desktop: Release 10. Redlands: Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Microsoft. (2013). Microsoft Office Excel.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Procter-Scherdtel, A., & Collins, D. (2013). Smoking restrictions on campus: Changes and challenges at three Canadian universities, 1970–2010. Health and Social Care in the Community, 21(1), 104–112.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01094.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reindl, D., Glassman, T., Price, J., Dake, J., & Yingling, F. (2014). Perceptions of college and university presidents regarding tobacco-free campus policies. Journal of American College Health, 62(3), 193.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2013.877019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy Gatto
    • 1
  • Sarah E. Powell
    • 1
  • Emily F. Walters
    • 1
  • Shahriar Zamani
    • 1
  • Liberty B. Sales
    • 1
  • Rita DeBate
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.University of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.College of Public HealthUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations