Knowledge and Beliefs About Pedestrian Safety in an Urban Community: Implications for Promoting Safe Walking
- 174 Downloads
As more people walk for transport and exercise, it is possible to avoid a concomitant increase in the number of pedestrian injuries. Understanding how the public views pedestrian safety can help inform the development of prevention strategies that support national efforts to promote walking and walkable communities. As part of the formative research for a community pedestrian safety health promotion campaign, we administered an online questionnaire to employees and students at a large urban medical campus, along with residents in the neighboring communities, to determine their knowledge, attitudes, and behavior regarding pedestrian safety; awareness of relevant traffic safety laws; and effective strategies that could improve pedestrian safety. Pearson Chi square Test of Independence was used to investigate differences between individuals who mainly traveled as drivers versus those who mainly traveled as pedestrians. Statistical significance was established at p < .05. A total of 3808 adults completed the online survey. More drivers than pedestrians reported that pedestrian safety was an important problem (73 and 64%, respectively; p < .001). A large proportion of respondents incorrectly reported the existing state laws addressing right of way, fines, and enforcement, with significant differences between drivers and pedestrians (p < .001). Significantly more pedestrians than drivers supported changing traffic signals to increase crossing time (p = .001), while more drivers than pedestrians supported creating structures to prevent midblock crossing (p = .003). Effective interventions to improve pedestrian safety need to tailor messages for both drivers and pedestrians, increase awareness of the laws, and implement comprehensive strategies.
KeywordsPedestrian safety Injury prevention Health promotion Formative research Health communication
The authors would like to thank the Maryland Highway Safety Office (MHSO), Johns Hopkins University, and the Baltimore Metropolitan Council (BMC) for providing funding and resources. Additional thanks are extended to survey participants; Bala Akundi at BMC; Ernie Lehr at MHSO; Mark Beisser, graphics designer from the Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs; Sue Baker, Eileen McDonald, Jim Williams, Nasir Mohd Ismail, Basant Motawi, and Xia Ma from the Johns Hopkins Center for Injury Research and Policy.
Funding for this work was made possible through multiple sources: Maryland Highway Safety Office; the Johns Hopkins University; and a Grant from the National Center for Injury Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Grant Number 1R49CE002466).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2015). Step it up! The surgeon general’s call to action to promote walking and walkable communities. Washington, D. C. Retrieved from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/calls/walking-and-walkable-communities/call-to-action-walking-and-walkable-communites.pdf.
- 6.National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2017). Pedestrians: 2015 data (traffic safety facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 375). U.S. Department of Transportation. Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.Google Scholar
- 9.Martin-Diener, E., Brügger, O., & Martin, B. (2010). Physical activity promotion and injury prevention: Relationship in sports and other forms of physical activity. Berne. Retrieved from http://www.bfu.ch/sites/assets/Shop/bfu_2.068.08_bfu-report no. 64%25E2%2580%2593PhysicalActivityPromotionandInjuryPrevention.pdf.
- 12.Rossen, L. M., Pollack, K. M., Curriero, F. C., Shields, T. M., Smart, M. J., Furr-Holden, C. D. M., & Cooley-Strickland, M. (2011). Neighborhood incivilities, perceived neighborhood safety, and walking to school among urban-dwelling children. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 8(2), 262–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Maryland State Highway Administration. (n.d.). GIS Traffic count data. Traffic monitoring system. Retrieved June 24, 2016, from http://www.roads.maryland.gov/Index.aspx?PageId=251.
- 15.Johns Hopkins Center for Injury Research and Policy. (2015). Be alert, don’t get hurt: A pedestrian safety campaign on an urban, academic campus. Baltimore, Maryland. Retrieved from https://www.jhsph.edu/research/centers-and-institutes/johns-hopkins-center-for-injury-research-and-policy/_docs/materials/pedestrian-safety-campaign/pedestrian-safety-brochure.pdf.
- 23.Hebert Martinez, K. L., & Porter, B. E. (2004). The likelihood of becoming a pedestrian fatality and drivers’ knowledge of pedestrian rights and responsibilities in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2003.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar