A Cross-Cultural Study of Weekly Sports Bettors in Australia and Spain
Betting on sport is one of the fastest developing forms of gambling internationally. Sports betting is attracting considerable scholarly, media, and regulatory attention due to the cultural salience of sport, and the rising public health concerns about the rapid proliferation and penetration of betting products in everyday life. Despite its global expansion, little is known regarding the comparative impact sports betting is having in different territories. This study aims to examine a sample of Australian (n = 738) and Spanish (n = 361) weekly sports bettors to assess their similarities and differences concerning sociodemographic characteristics, channels (i.e., online vs. offline) and devices used, in-play betting, and problem gambling severity. The findings showed high problem gambling scores among sports bettors in both countries, and consistent similarities in the association between problem gambling, in-play betting, and offline betting. Also, clear trends were observed between problem gambling, higher educational level, and female sport betting, particularly in the Australian sample. These results suggest a common pattern of risk factors for problematic sports betting and can help to inform worldwide regulatory efforts to tackle harmful sports betting-specific features such as in-play betting.
KeywordsProblem gambling Sports betting In-play betting Online gambling Australian gambling Spanish gambling
Hibai Lopez-Gonzalez has been supported by the Government of the Basque Country, Spain, under grant reference (Eusko Jaurlaritza, POS_2015_1_0062). He and Ana Estévez have been additionally funded by the Spanish Organization of the Blind (ONCE, III International Award). Alex Russell has received funding from Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation; Queensland Justice and Attorney-General; Gambling Research Australia; National Association for Gambling Studies; Australian Communications and Media Authority and the Alberta Gambling Research Institute. He has received industry funding for an evaluation of problem gambling amongst casino employees from Echo/Star Entertainment Group. He is also affiliated with the University of Sydney. Nerilee Hing has received research funds from the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, Gambling Research Australia, Australian Government Department of Social Services, Alberta Gambling Research Institute, the Australian Gambling Research Centre, the Queensland, New South Wales, Victorian and South Australian Governments, the Australian Research Council, and Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety. She has also received consultancy funds from Echo Entertainment and Sportsbet and an honorarium from Singapore Pools for membership of its International Advisory Committee. Mark Griffiths declares that he has received funding for a number of research projects in the area of gambling education for young people, social responsibility in gambling and gambling treatment from the Responsibility in Gambling Trust, a charitable body which funds its research program based on donations from the gambling industry. He also undertakes consultancy for various gaming companies in the area of social responsibility in gambling.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Both studies had obtained approval by the respective research ethics committee of their universities in their countries. The Australian study was approved by Southern Cross University Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval ECN-16-201), and reciprocal approval was granted by CQUniversity Australia Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval H16/06-163). The Spanish study was approved (Reference: ETK-13/15-16) in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. In both cohorts, participants were compensated for their time following each panel’s protocols. Participants were reassured of their right to withdraw from the respective studies at any time, the confidentiality of their data, and provided informed consent to participate.
- Armstrong, A., & Carroll, M. (2017a). Gambling activity in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Gambling Research Centre, Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
- Armstrong, A., & Carroll, M. (2017b). Sports betting in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Gambling Research Centre, Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
- Australian Commonwealth Parliament. Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (2001). Australia.Google Scholar
- Bonnaire, C., Kovess-Masfety, V., Guignard, R., Richard, J. B., du Roscoät, E., & Beck, F. (2017). Gambling type, substance abuse, health and psychosocial correlates of male and female problem gamblers in a nationally representative French sample. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(2), 343–369.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Department of Social Services. (2018). National consumer protection framework for online wagering. Retrieved December 19, 2018, from: https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/11_2018/ncpfow-fact-sheet28-nov-2018-2.pdf.
- Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego. (2016). Estudio sobre prevalencia, comportamiento y características de los usuarios de juegos de azar en España 2015. Madrid: Spanish Ministry for Finance and Public Administration.Google Scholar
- Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego. (2017a). Datos del mercado de juego online. Madrid: Spanish Ministry for Finance and Public Administration.Google Scholar
- Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego. (2017b). Gasto promocional de juego online. Madrid: Spanish Ministry for Finance and Public Administration.Google Scholar
- European Gaming & Betting Association. (2018). Most popular gambling activities. Brussels: European Gaming & Betting Association.Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Gainsbury, S. M., Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., Lubman, D. I., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014). The prevalence and determinants of problem gambling in australia: Assessing the impact of interactive gambling and new technologies. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28(3), 769–779.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Gambling Commission. (2016). In-play (in-running) betting: Position paper. London. Retrieved December 19, 2018, from: https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/pdf/In-running-betting-position-paper.pdf.
- Gambling Commission. (2018). Gambling Commission to crackdown on operators who don’t treat consumers fairly. Retrieved December 19, 2018, from: https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news-action-and-statistics/news/2018/Crackdown-on-operators-who-dont-treat-consumers-fairly.aspx.
- Gebauer, L., LaBrie, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2010). Optimizing DSM-IV-TR classification accuracy: A brief biosocial screen for detecting current gambling disorders among gamblers in the general household population. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(2), 82–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hing, N., Gainsbury, S., Blaszczynski, A., Wood, R., Lubman, D., & Russell, A. (2014a). Interactive gambling. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
- Hing, N., Russell, A. M. T., & Browne, M. (2017). Risk factors for gambling problems on online electronic gaming machines, race betting and sports betting. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(8), 775.Google Scholar
- Lopez-Gonzalez, H., Estévez, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2018a). Internet-based structural characteristics of sports betting and problem gambling severity: Is there a relationship? International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9876-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Milner, L., Hing, N., Vitartas, P., & Lamont, M. (2013). An exploratory study of embedded gambling promotion in Australian football television broadcasts. Communication, Politics and Culture, 46, 177–198.Google Scholar
- National Opinion Research Center. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2018). Youth unemployment rate. Paris. Retrieved December 19, 2018, from: https://data.oecd.org/unemp/youth-unemployment-rate.htm.
- Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). The role of structural characteristics in gambling. In G. Smith, D. Hodgins, & R. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 211–243). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Queensland Government Statistician’s Office. (2018). Australian Gambling Statistics (34th ed.). Queensland: Queensland Government Statistician’s Office.Google Scholar
- Stradbrooke, S. (2018). Italy gambling advertising ban targets January 1, 2019 start. Retrieved December 19, 2018, from: https://calvinayre.com/2018/06/27/business/italy-advertising-ban-january-2019/.
- Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, R. M. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Ottawa: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Wood, J., Howman, D., & Murrihy, R. (2018). Report of the review of Australia’s sports integrity arrangements. Canberra: Department of Health, Australian Government.Google Scholar