Making EGMs Accountable: Can an Informative and Dynamic Interface Help Players Self-regulate?
Electronic gaming machines (EGMs) are recognised as one of the most harmful gambling forms, because they promote high-speed repetitive gambling and automatically reinvest winnings. These features, amongst others, make it difficult for EGM gamblers to keep track of their play. Tools to assist gamblers exist, but have limited effectiveness because they require user registration and manual activation, leading to low uptake. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of a more informative interface (including removal of automatic reinvestment of winnings) and pop-up messages on gambling behaviour, and on player experience. A total of 213 Australian participants, recruited through social media, played a simulated online EGM. The experiment was a two (standard vs. informative interface) × two (pop-ups absent vs. present) between-subjects design. The informative interface: promoted keeping track of spins played; increased accurate estimation of amount spent (as did pop-up messages) and time played; and provided game usage figures which acted as cues to quit play. Once the initial deposit (but not winnings) was expended, informative interface users could opt to reinvest their winnings, although many opted to exit at that point. No difference in total spending or dissociation was observed between experimental groups. Informative interface users reported no reduction in enjoyment. Pop-up messages reduced enjoyment with the standard interface, but increased enjoyment when paired with an informative interface. These findings indicate that a more informative interface and pop-up messages may be useful in reducing the harmful nature of EGMs.
KeywordsElectronic gaming machines Gambling Pop-up messages Overspending Cues to quit Estimation accuracy
This study was conducted as part of the requirements of an Honours degree by the first author. The last author was supervisor on this project.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Christopher Byrne declares no conflicts of interest in relation to this manuscript. Alex Russell has received funding from Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation; NSW Office of Responsible Gambling; Queensland Justice and Attorney-General; Gambling Research Australia; National Association for Gambling Studies; Australian Communications and Media Authority and the Alberta Gambling Research Institute. He has received industry funding for an evaluation of problem gambling amongst casino employees from Echo/Star Entertainment Group. He is also affiliated with the University of Sydney. He declares no conflicts of interest in relation to this manuscript.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Approval was gained from the CQUniversity Human Research Ethics Committee - Approval number 2018-085.
- Armstrong, A., & Carroll, M. (2017). Gambling activity in Australia. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Gambling Research Centre, Australian Institute of Family Studies. https://aifs.gov.au/agrc/sites/default/files/publication-documents/rr-gambling_activity_in_australia_0.pdf. Retrieved December 3, 2018.
- Barton, K., Yazdani, A., Ayer, N., Kalvapalle, S., Brown, S., Stapleton, J., et al. (2017). The effect of losses disguised as wins and near misses in electronic gaming machines: A systematic review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(4), 1241–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-017-9688-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Binde, P. (2011). What are the most harmful forms of gambling? Analyzing problem gambling prevalence surveys. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/26165. Retrieved February 3, 2019.
- Breen, R. (2004). Rapid onset of pathological gambling in machine gamblers: A replication. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2(1), 44–49. https://prism.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/1880/47873/IJMHA_2004_2(1)_Breen.pdf?sequence=1. Retrieved August 17, 2018.
- Browne, M., Langham, E., Rawat, V., Greer, N., Li, E., Rose, J., et al. (2016). Assessing gambling-related harm in Victoria: A public health perspective. Melbourne: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.Google Scholar
- Delfabbro, P. (2004). The stubborn logic of regular gamblers: Obstacles and dilemmas in cognitive gambling research. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGS.0000016701.17146.d0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Delfabbro, P. (2012a). Australasian gambling review (5th ed.). Adelaide, SA: Independent Gambling Authority.Google Scholar
- Delfabbro, P. (2012b). Evaluation of the Maxetag budget setting feature: Final report. Adelaide, SA: School of Psychology, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). London: SAGE. https://market.android.com/details?id=book-QMI-DwAAQBAJ.
- Gainsbury, S., Aro, D., Ball, D., Tobar, C., & Russell, A. (2015b). Determining optimal placement for pop-up messages: Evaluation of a live trial of dynamic warning messages for electronic gaming machines. International Gambling Studies, 15(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2014.1000358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hing, N. (2003). An assessment of member awareness, perceived adequacy and perceived effectiveness of responsible gambling strategies in Sydney clubs. Southern Cross University. https://epubs.scu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1477&context=tourism_pubs. Retrieved August 19, 2019.
- Hing, N., Russell, A., Nuske, E., & Gainsbury, S. (2015). The stigma of problem gambling: Causes, characteristics and consequences. Melbourne, VIC: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation. https://insidegambling.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/25571/Hing_Stigma_of_problem_gambling_Sep_2015.pdf. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
- Hing, N., Russell, A., Rockloff, M., Browne, M., Langham, E., Li, E., et al. (2018). Effects of wagering marketing on vulnerable adults. Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation. https://responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au/resources/publications/effects-of-wagering-marketing-on-vulnerable-adults-408/. Retrieved February 3, 2019.
- josex2r. (2018). jQuery-SlotMachine. GitHub. https://github.com/josex2r/jQuery-SlotMachine. Retrieved August 20, 2018.
- Kim, H., Wohl, M., Stewart, M., Sztainert, T., & Gainsbury, S. (2014). Limit your time, gamble responsibly: Setting a time limit (via pop-up message) on an electronic gaming machine reduces time on device. International Gambling Studies, 14(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2014.910244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Livingstone, C., & Woolley, R. (2008). The relevance and role of gaming machine games and game features on the play of problem gamblers. Adelaide: Independent Gambling Authority. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/gambling-2010/submissions/sub099-attachment2.pdf. Retrieved February 3, 2019.
- Mizerski, R., Lee, A., Sadeque, S., Jolley, W., Wang, S., Jiang, J., & Osborne, C. (2012). Boomerang effects of gambling warnings exposed to non-problem gamblers. In Australian & New Zealand Marketing Academy. Conference (2012 : Adelaide, South Australia) (pp. 1–7). ANZMAC. http://dro.deakin.edu.au/view/DU:30076071. Retrieved October 18, 2018.
- Nisbet, S. (2005). Responsible gambling features of card-based technologies. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 3(2), 54–63. https://prism.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/1880/47894/IJMHA_2005_3(2)_Nisbet.pdf?sequence=1. Retrieved August 14, 2018.
- Omnifacts Bristol Research. (2007). Nova Scotia player card research project: Stage III research report. Halifax, NS: Nova Scotia Gaming Corporation.Google Scholar
- Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling. In Report no. 50. Canberra, ACT: Productivity Commission.Google Scholar
- Queensland Government Statistician’s Office. (2018). Australian gambling statistics (34th edn.). Brisbane, QLD: Queensland Treasury. http://www.qgso.qld.gov.au/products/reports/aus-gambling-stats/aus-gambling-stats-34th-edn.pdf. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
- Schüll, N. (2012). Addiction by design: Machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/Addiction_by_Design.html?hl=&id=_Vsk6EXc1_4C.
- The Economist. (2017). The world’s biggest gamblers. The Economist. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2017/02/09/the-worlds-biggest-gamblers. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
- Thomas, A., Rintoul, A., Deblaquiere, J., Armstrong, A., Moore, S., Carson, R., & Christensen, D. (2016). Review of electronic gaming machine pre-commitment features: Transaction history statements. Australian Institute of Family Studies. https://prism.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/1880/51886/agrc-precommitment-transaction-history.pdf?sequence=1. Retrieved January 8, 2019.
- Thomas, S., Pitt, H., Bestman, A., Randle, M., McCarthy, S., & Daube, M. (2018). The determinants of gambling normalisation: Causes, consequences and public health responses. Victoria: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.Google Scholar
- Wohl, M., Parush, A., Kim, H., & Warren, K. (2014). Building it better: Applying human–computer interaction and persuasive system design principles to a monetary limit tool improves responsible gambling. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar