Gender Differences in Gambling Exposure and At-risk Gambling Behavior
This study aimed to evaluate the differences in gambling exposure and onset of gambling problems among male and female gamblers by comparing their demographic and behavioral profiles. This study utilized data from the gambling section of the First Brazilian National Alcohol Survey and Related Behaviors. Interviews were conducted with 3007 participants who were recruited after screening for at-risk gambling behaviors. Individuals who tested positive for at-risk gambling behaviors completed the Gambling Progression Questionnaire comprising items on games of chance, and were evaluated using the DSM-IV pathological gambling criteria. The participants’ “lifetime gambling exposure” was 12.5%, with 4% having experienced gambling problems during their lifetime. Majority of the male at-risk gamblers (78%) reported that they began gambling in their 20 s and took approximately 3 years to start experiencing gambling-related problems. Contrastingly, female at-risk gamblers started gambling in their 30 s and they took about 12 years to start experiencing gambling-related problems. The present results show that men were 2.3 times more at risk of gambling exposure and 3.6 times more likely to experience gambling-related problems. Male at-risk male gamblers seemed to be lonelier and to have a low socioeconomic status, while women seemed to have lower income and social insertion. Considering these significant differences, more studies evaluating gender differences in gambling behavior are necessary.
KeywordsPathological gambling Gambling gender differences At-risk gambling Gambling exposure
This study was partially funded by the National Anti-Drug Secretariat (SENAD), Grant # 017/2003.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of São Paulo, located in the city of São Paulo, Brazil.
- DataUFF. (2013). Núcleo de Pesquisas da Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói, Brazil: Universidade Federal Fluminense; (updated 5 September 2013). Pesquisa Social Brasileira; (updated 3 November 2009). http://www.uff.br/datauff/PESB.htm. Accessed September 8, 2013.
- Gerstein, D., Murphy, S., Toce, M., Hoffmann, J., Palmer, A., & Johnson, R. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
- Hansen, H. M., Hurwitz, W. N., & Madow, W. G. (1993). Sample survey methods and theory (Vol. I and II). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; IBGE. (2013). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; (updated 5 September 2013). Estimativas das populações residentes, em 1º de julho de 2008, segundo os municípios [Estimated resident populations on July 1, 2008, by municipality]; (updated 12 December 2008). http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/estimativa2008/POP_2008_TCU.pdf. Accessed September 8, 2013.
- SPSS Inc. (2004). SPSS statistical package for social sciences. Version 13.0 for Windows. Chicago: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Williams, R., Volberg, R., & Stevens, R. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. In Report prepared for the Ontario problem gambling research centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Ontario: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.Google Scholar