Advertisement

Til Debt Do Us Part: Comparing Gambling Harms Between Gamblers and Their Spouses

  • Lisa Jeffrey
  • Matthew Browne
  • Vijay RawatEmail author
  • Erika Langham
  • En Li
  • Matthew Rockloff
Original Paper
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

This study compared the experience of gambling related harms between gamblers and spouses, whilst taking into account gender and problem gambling severity. Participants (N = 5036, 2603 females) from Australia and New Zealand completed a retrospective survey that probed the prevalence of specific harms from gambling within six harm domains (financial, work/study, health, emotional/psychological, relationship, and social deviance). Overall there was a similar count of total harms reported across all domains experienced by spouses (vs gamblers), however the types and patterns of harms reported were markedly different. Spouses reported the highest number of harms within the emotional/psychological and relationship domains, whereas gamblers experienced a higher number of harms in all other domains. Spouses were five to six times more likely to report increased conflict in their relationship due to gambling, greater relationship tension, and ending a relationship. In comparison, gamblers reported more severe health-related harms, such as suicide attempts and increased alcohol consumption. The findings highlight the unique ways in which gamblers and their spouses each respond to the presence of gambling problems.

Keywords

Gambling harms Gamblers Gambling problems Concerned significant others Spouses Gender 

Notes

Funding

Funding was awarded from the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation and New Zealand Ministry of Health for the larger gambling harms studies from which the data was obtained for the current manuscript. No funding was received for the preparation of this manuscript or the findings here in.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Matthew Browne has received grants from the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, the New Zealand Ministry of Health and Gambling Research Australia. Erika Langham has received grants from Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, Gambling Research Australia, Australian National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety, Department of Human Services, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Queensland Education, Lowitja Institute, and Menzies School of Health. She has also received honorarium and had travel costs paid by Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, Gambling Impact Society, Gamble Aware and the Gambling Research Exchange Ontario. Matthew Rockloff has received grants from the Queensland Treasury, the Victorian Treasury, the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, the New Zealand Ministry of Health and Gambling Research Australia. En Li has received research grants from the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation and Gambling Research Australia. Lisa Jeffries and Vijay Rawat declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Browne, M., Bellringer, M., Greer, N., Kolandai-Matchett, K., Rawat, V., Langham, E., et al. (2017). Measuring the burden of gambling harm in New Zealand. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
  2. Browne, M., Langham, E., Rawat, V., Greer, N., Li, E., Rose, J., et al. (2016). Assessing gambling-related harm in Victoria: A public health perspective. Melbourne, VIC: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Ciccarelli, M., Griffiths, M. D., Nigro, G., & Cosenza, M. (2017). Decision making, cognitive distortions and emotional distress: A comparison between pathological gamblers and healthy controls. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 54, 204–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dickson-Swift, V. A., James, E. L., & Kippen, S. (2005). The experience of living with a problem gambler: Spouses and partners speak out. Journal of Gambling Issues.  https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2005.13.6.Google Scholar
  5. Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2009). The family functioning of female pathological gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 29–44.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2195-3007-3-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferland, F., Fournier, P. M., Ladouceur, R., Brochu, P., Bouchard, M., & Pâquet, L. (2008). Consequences of pathological gambling on the gambler and his spouse. Journal of Gambling Issues, 22, 219–229.  https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2008.22.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  8. Gainsbury, S., Hing, N., & Suhonen, N. (2013). Professional help-seeking for gambling problems: Awareness, barriers and motivators for treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30, 503–519.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9373-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodwin, B. C., Browne, M., Rockloff, M., & Donaldson, P. (2015). Do gamblers eat more salt? Testing a latent trait model of covariance in consumption. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4, 170–180.  https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hing, N., Tiyce, M., Holdsworth, L., & Nuske, E. (2013). All in the family: Help-seeking by significant others of problem gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11, 396–408.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-012-9423-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hodgins, D. C., Shead, N. W., & Makarchuk, K. (2007). Relationship satisfaction and psychological distress among concerned significant others of pathological gamblers. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195, 65–71.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nmd.0000252382.47434.a6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalischuk, R. G. (2010). Cocreating life pathways: Problem gambling and its impact on families. The Family Journal, 18, 7–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480709357898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kalischuk, R. G., Nowatzki, N., Cardwell, K., Klein, K., & Solowoniuk, J. (2007). Problem gambling and its impact on families: A literature review. International Gambling Studies, 6, 31–60.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14459790600644176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Korman, L. M., Collins, J., Dutton, D., Dhayananthan, B., Littman-Sharp, N., & Skinner, W. (2008). Problem gambling and intimate partner violence. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 13–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14459790600644176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Korn, D., & Shaffer, H. (1999). Gambling and the health of the public: Adopting a public health perspective. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 289–365.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023005115932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kourgiantakis, T., Saint-Jacques, M. C., & Tremblay, J. (2013). Problem gambling and families: A systematic review. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 13, 353–372.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256x.2013.838130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kushnir, V., Godinho, A., Hodgins, D. C., Hendershot, C. S., & Cunningham, J. A. (2016). Gender differences in self-conscious emotions and motivation to quit gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32, 969–983.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9574-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Langham, E., Thorne, H., Browne, M., Donaldson, P., Rose, J., & Rockloff, M. (2016). Understanding gambling related harm: A proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms. BMC Public Health, 16, 80.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2747-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lesieur, H. R. (1998). Costs and treatment of pathological gambling. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 556, 153–171.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716298556001012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li, E., Browne, M., Rawat, V., Langham, E., & Rockloff, M. (2017). Breaking bad: comparing gambling harms among gamblers and affected others. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33, 223–248.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-016-9632-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lorenz, V. C., & Yaffee, R. A. (1988). Pathological gambling: Psychosomatic, emotional and marital difficulties as reported by the spouse. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 4, 13–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01043525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mathews, M., & Volberg, R. (2013). Impact of problem gambling on financial, emotional and social well-being of Singaporean families. International Gambling Studies, 13, 127–140.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2012.731422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Patford, J. (2009). For worse, for poorer and ill health: How women experience, understand and respond to a partner’s gambling problems. International Journal of Mental Health and Addictions, 7, 177–189.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2012.731422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Potenza, M. N. (2008). The neurobiology of pathological gambling and drug addiction: An overview and new findings. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3181.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.
  26. Raghunathan, R., & Pham, M. T. (1999). All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 56–77.  https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Valentine, G., & Hughes, K. A. (2010). Ripples in a pond: The disclosure to, and management of, problem Internet gambling with/in the family. Community, Work and Family, 13, 273–290.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2010.488107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health, Medical and Applied SciencesCQUniversityBundabergAustralia
  2. 2.School of Health, Medical and Applied SciencesCQUniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.School of Health, Medical and Applied SciencesCQUniversityCairnsAustralia
  4. 4.School of Business and LawCQUniversityRockhamptonAustralia

Personalised recommendations